On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 05:57:15PM +, Vijay Sankar wrote:
> Quoting Otto Moerbeek :
>
> >On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 04:04:04PM +, Vijay Sankar wrote:
> >
> >>My objective for this weekend was to follow the new dpb and build ports
> >>without using sudo. So I was hoping to upgrade to the lates
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015, at 09:15 PM, Vijay Sankar wrote:
>
> Quoting Eric Furman :
>
> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2015, at 01:57 PM, Vijay Sankar wrote:
> >> Quoting Otto Moerbeek :
> >>
> >> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 04:04:04PM +, Vijay Sankar wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> My objective for this weekend was to
Quoting Otto Moerbeek :
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 04:04:04PM +, Vijay Sankar wrote:
My objective for this weekend was to follow the new dpb and build ports
without using sudo. So I was hoping to upgrade to the latest snapshot on a
system that I use for tests.
The test system has a 2TB drive
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 04:04:04PM +, Vijay Sankar wrote:
> My objective for this weekend was to follow the new dpb and build ports
> without using sudo. So I was hoping to upgrade to the latest snapshot on a
> system that I use for tests.
>
> The test system has a 2TB drive and it had two 30
My objective for this weekend was to follow the new dpb and build
ports without using sudo. So I was hoping to upgrade to the latest
snapshot on a system that I use for tests.
The test system has a 2TB drive and it had two 300GB partitions in it
for ports and vm; and a 120GB SSD for the OS
On Sun, 8 Jun 2014, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
On 2014-06-05, David Vasek wrote:
Did you try smartctl from smartmontools for a more detailed report?
I assume there is a 1000-page SMART spec somewhere that would come
in handy for interpreting the responses?
I'm not an expert. But I believ
On 2014-06-05, "STeve Andre'" wrote:
> I think you are relying on the smart system too much.
Not at all, but I knew people would immediately direct me to it.
> Certainly try what David said, but it's obvious that the disk is
> sick despite what the smart system may say.
I got a replacement dis
On 2014-06-05, David Vasek wrote:
> Did you try smartctl from smartmontools for a more detailed report?
I assume there is a 1000-page SMART spec somewhere that would come
in handy for interpreting the responses?
> My favourite are:
>
> smartctl -a /dev/sd1c
> smartctl -l scttemp /dev/sd1c
Temp
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014, at 05:24 PM, STeve Andre' wrote:
> On 06/05/14 17:38, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> > I have a 3TB disk here...
> >
> > sd1 at scsibus1 targ 1 lun 0: SCSI3 0/direct
> > fixed naa.5000cca225c5fbeb
> > sd1: 2861588MB, 512 bytes/sector, 5860533168 sectors
> >
> > ... that's serv
On 06/05/14 17:38, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
I have a 3TB disk here...
sd1 at scsibus1 targ 1 lun 0: SCSI3 0/direct
fixed naa.5000cca225c5fbeb
sd1: 2861588MB, 512 bytes/sector, 5860533168 sectors
... that's serving as a general media dump with a single FFS2 file
system on it.
Filesystem
On Thu, 5 Jun 2014, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
I have a 3TB disk here...
sd1 at scsibus1 targ 1 lun 0: SCSI3 0/direct
fixed naa.5000cca225c5fbeb
sd1: 2861588MB, 512 bytes/sector, 5860533168 sectors
... that's serving as a general media dump with a single FFS2 file
system on it.
Filesystem
I have a 3TB disk here...
sd1 at scsibus1 targ 1 lun 0: SCSI3 0/direct
fixed naa.5000cca225c5fbeb
sd1: 2861588MB, 512 bytes/sector, 5860533168 sectors
... that's serving as a general media dump with a single FFS2 file
system on it.
Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 07:01:21PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
> Emilio Perea wrote:
> > I ran into a problem when rebooting to a current kernel (i386 GENERIC)
> > due to a secondary disk without an 'a' partition.
>
> I don't think the lack of an 'a' partition is your problem. Goodness
> knows,
Nick Holland wrote:
> Otherwise..I'm confused...which isn't to
> say I'm not missing something.
I've been informed that I *was* missing something, that this is a
problem which is being dealt with, beatings are being applied (including
to me, for missing it...). Disregard my comments...things will
Emilio Perea wrote:
> I ran into a problem when rebooting to a current kernel (i386 GENERIC)
> due to a secondary disk without an 'a' partition.
I don't think the lack of an 'a' partition is your problem. Goodness
knows, I've got a lot of machines with no 'a' partition on the second
and later d
I ran into a problem when rebooting to a current kernel (i386 GENERIC)
due to a secondary disk without an 'a' partition. Disk sd0 checked out
fine, but all the partitions on sd1 had bad magic numbers and failed
fsck:
/dev/rsd1d: BAD SUPER BLOCK: MAGIC NUMBER WRONG
/dev/rsd1d: UNEXPECTED INCONSIST
16 matches
Mail list logo
