On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 5:13 AM, Kenneth R Westerback
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 06:15:25PM -0700, patrick keshishian wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Nick Holland
>> wrote:
>> > Daniel Malament wrote:
>> >> On 10/22/2009 5:37 AM, William Boshuck wrote:
>> And here I thought
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 06:15:25PM -0700, patrick keshishian wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Nick Holland
> wrote:
> > Daniel Malament wrote:
> >> On 10/22/2009 5:37 AM, William Boshuck wrote:
> And here I thought I remembered the new installer being described as
> easier to use.
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Nick Holland
> wrote:
> > Daniel Malament wrote:
> >> On 10/22/2009 5:37 AM, William Boshuck wrote:
> And here I thought I remembered the new installer being described as
> easier to use.
> >>
> >>> It is. Were it not so quick it would be positively
> >>> b
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Nick Holland
wrote:
> Daniel Malament wrote:
>> On 10/22/2009 5:37 AM, William Boshuck wrote:
And here I thought I remembered the new installer being described as
easier to use.
>>
>>> It is. Were it not so quick it would be positively
>>> boring. Just don't
Daniel Malament wrote:
> On 10/22/2009 5:37 AM, William Boshuck wrote:
>>> And here I thought I remembered the new installer being described as easier
>>> to use.
>
>> It is. Were it not so quick it would be positively
>> boring. Just don't set mount points for the partitions
>
> Perhaps I shou
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 03:34:45AM -0400, Daniel Malament wrote:
> On 10/22/2009 2:41 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >>There used to be a message before the install script wiped out
> >>filesystems with newfs, listing the partitions and asking if you
> >>were sure. Was this removed, or did I somehow m
On 10/22/2009 5:37 AM, William Boshuck wrote:
And here I thought I remembered the new installer being described as easier to
use.
It is. Were it not so quick it would be positively
boring. Just don't set mount points for the partitions
Perhaps I should clarify: IMO, not double-checking wit
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 03:34:45AM -0400, Daniel Malament wrote:
> On 10/22/2009 2:41 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >>There used to be a message before the install script wiped out
> >>filesystems with newfs, listing the partitions and asking if you were
> >>sure. Was this removed, or did I somehow
On 10/22/2009 4:31 AM, Jan Stary wrote:
On Oct 22 03:34:45, Daniel Malament wrote:
In fact, there was a particular reason for my question. I had the vague
impression, probably erroneous, I suppose, that it was possible to get
the old install script to only newfs those systems for which you
On Oct 22 03:34:45, Daniel Malament wrote:
> In fact, there was a particular reason for my question. I had the vague
> impression, probably erroneous, I suppose, that it was possible to get
> the old install script to only newfs those systems for which you
> specified a mount point.
Which i
Donald Allen wrote:
> When doing a clean install of 4.6 on a machine with a 20 Gb Windows
> partition at the beginning of a 60 Gb disk, I needed to create the
> OpenBSD (A6) partition. I did so in CHS mode. When it prompted me for
> the starting sector of the partition, it offered [1] as the defaul
On 10/22/2009 2:41 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
There used to be a message before the install script wiped out
filesystems with newfs, listing the partitions and asking if you were
sure. Was this removed, or did I somehow miss something? And WHY???
Because it is the install script.
What did you
> There used to be a message before the install script wiped out
> filesystems with newfs, listing the partitions and asking if you were
> sure. Was this removed, or did I somehow miss something? And WHY???
Because it is the install script.
What did you think it was going to do.
It's install
There used to be a message before the install script wiped out
filesystems with newfs, listing the partitions and asking if you were
sure. Was this removed, or did I somehow miss something? And WHY???
Isn't it quite reverse logic? If you have Windows partition then I
suppose that you want dualboot.
In this case your Windows will be on first primary partition and
OpenBSD can be installed without problems
to second partition of type FAT32. Then you just need to switch to A6
type and it's all. I'm
When doing a clean install of 4.6 on a machine with a 20 Gb Windows
partition at the beginning of a 60 Gb disk, I needed to create the
OpenBSD (A6) partition. I did so in CHS mode. When it prompted me for
the starting sector of the partition, it offered [1] as the default.
When I hit 'enter', it co
16 matches
Mail list logo
