Totally agree!! :)
On Jun 29, 2008, at 3:03 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2008-06-29, Parvinder Bhasin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Rod!! and Phillip!! for your help. I had done what you had
mentioned in your replies. I was double checking with experts to
make
sure it was right.
On 2008-06-29, Parvinder Bhasin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Rod!! and Phillip!! for your help. I had done what you had
> mentioned in your replies. I was double checking with experts to make
> sure it was right.
If you want to double-check with experts, give them unobfuscated
data s
Thanks Rod!! and Phillip!! for your help. I had done what you had
mentioned in your replies. I was double checking with experts to make
sure it was right. And it seems like I got it right.
Oh yeah, the TTL is set very LOW for just in case there was a goof up
on my side :) . I will be c
On Saturday, June 28, 2008, 16:32:18, Parvinder Bhasin wrote:
> ...
> How should I write out the config in named.conf to reflect the reverse
> zone?
> Lets say my network is 192.168.1.0/25.
> ...
> 2.1/25.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa. 300 IN PTR foobar.mydns.com
It's simpler if you establish an
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Parvinder Bhasin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am having issues setting up reverse zone for my domain.
> We own only HALF or PART of the network instead of whole class C.
>
> How should I write out the config in named.conf to reflect the reverse zone?
For networks
Hi all,
I am having issues setting up reverse zone for my domain.
We own only HALF or PART of the network instead of whole class C.
How should I write out the config in named.conf to reflect the reverse
zone?
Lets say my network is 192.168.1.0/25.
This is how I wrote my named.conf
zone "1/
6 matches
Mail list logo