PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Kevin .
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 5:41 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Non Developers allowed to ask questions ?
there seems to be some unwritten rule that users (not to be confused
with developers) are not allowed to ask
On 19/10/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a legitimate use for top posting.
Deletion and/or answer of message in 10 to 15 seconds or less.
Nonsense. Just because your MS Outlook does not support or is not
configured to support bottom-posting, doesn't mean that you should
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, STeve Andre' wrote:
SNIP
You can determine to nearly 100% the support of something by
looking at the suported hardware pages. I'm guessing you are
using some i386 machine, and there is a *great deal* of information
on the cards and devices supported. Looking there has
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 14:06:11 +0100
Constantine A. Murenin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19/10/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a legitimate use for top posting.
Deletion and/or answer of message in 10 to 15 seconds or less.
Nonsense. Just because your MS Outlook does
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 14:06:11
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19/10/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a legitimate use for top posting.
Deletion and/or answer of message in 10 to 15
seconds or less.
Nonsense. Just because your MS Outlook does not
support or is not
configured
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 10:07:47
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 14:06:11 +0100
Constantine A. Murenin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 19/10/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a legitimate use for top posting.
Deletion and/or answer of message in 10 to 15
seconds or less.
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 10:07:47AM -0600, Ken Gunderson wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 14:06:11 +0100
Constantine A. Murenin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19/10/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a legitimate use for top posting.
Deletion and/or answer of message in 10 to
blah blah blah
Just stop it with this top post horseshit. Nobody cares, for fuck's
sake.
On Oct 19, 2005, at 2:13 PM, Benjamin Collins wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 10:07:47AM -0600, Ken Gunderson wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 14:06:11 +0100
Constantine A. Murenin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm curious,
there seems to be some unwritten rule that users (not to be confused
with developers) are not allowed to ask whether certain things are
supported in OpenBSD or when these items are likely to be available, in
particular this seems to be on the misc@ mailing list. The openbsd site
On Tuesday 18 October 2005 17:32, OpenBSD Admin wrote:
I'm curious,
there seems to be some unwritten rule that users (not to be confused
with developers) are not allowed to ask whether certain things are
supported in OpenBSD or when these items are likely to be available, in
particular
there seems to be some unwritten rule that users (not to be confused
with developers) are not allowed to ask whether certain things are
supported in OpenBSD or when these items are likely to be available,
Nope--not at all. Stupid questions that show a lack of research and/or lack
of supporting
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 05:56:32PM -0400, STeve Andre' wrote:
On Tuesday 18 October 2005 17:32, OpenBSD Admin wrote:
So where does one post questions *after* having read the FAQ etc
in misc@, ports@, or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tho' posting questions that could be answered by the self with
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 07:32:47 +1000
OpenBSD Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there seems to be some unwritten rule that users (not to be confused
with developers) are not allowed to ask whether certain things are
supported in OpenBSD or when these items are likely to be available, in
13 matches
Mail list logo
