On 2016-03-05 Sat 21:56 PM |, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> Besides qmail, this is easy to setup with Postfix (my preferred option
> for these)
Default:
$ postconf -d recipient_delimiter
recipient_delimiter =
Set this to your favourite character in /etc/postfix/main.cf:
$ postconf recipient_delimi
2016-03-06 11:21 GMT+01:00 Stuart Henderson :
> On 2016/03/06 09:07, ludovic coues wrote:
>> 2016-03-05 22:56 GMT+01:00 Stuart Henderson :
>> >
>> > For OpenSMTPD I haven't tried it but I suspect you may be able to do
>> > this with a virtual map using a python script via table-python (in
>> > ooen
On 2016/03/06 09:07, ludovic coues wrote:
> 2016-03-05 22:56 GMT+01:00 Stuart Henderson :
> >
> > For OpenSMTPD I haven't tried it but I suspect you may be able to do
> > this with a virtual map using a python script via table-python (in
> > ooensmtpd-extras in ports) but there isn't much documenta
2016-03-05 22:56 GMT+01:00 Stuart Henderson :
>
> For OpenSMTPD I haven't tried it but I suspect you may be able to do
> this with a virtual map using a python script via table-python (in
> ooensmtpd-extras in ports) but there isn't much documentation for
> this. Though actually a quick search for
On 2016-03-02, Claus Niesen wrote:
> I used to run my own at home mailserver (openbsd + qmail) . Since I no
> longer have a static IP, I switched to an email provider that supports
> minus addressing but operates in the dark ages, especially in regards to
> security updates. Needless to say I ne
On 2016-03-03, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> On 3 March 2016 at 14:39, Andy Bradford wrote:
>> Thus said Gilles Chehade on Thu, 03 Mar 2016 10:14:48 +0100:
>>
>>> Who should get mail for foo-bar@ ?
>>
>> The MTA will decide who will get foo-bar@.
>
> How? A /dev/mind RPC? :-)
By reading the c
Thu, 3 Mar 2016 14:55:58 -0600 "Constantine A. Murenin"
> On 2 March 2016 at 14:19, Claus Niesen wrote:
> > Sorry for the off topic question but I'm hoping that maybe some of your
> > know of or work for an email hosting provider
Cut here.
> > I used to run my own at home mailserver (openbsd +
Thus said Gilles Chehade on Thu, 03 Mar 2016 22:48:57 +0100:
> > I don't see this as necessarily an argument for or against - vs +
> >
>
> too bad, it means my friend jean-pierre will not be able to be hosted
> by you if you already host my other friend jean ;-)
This is true, obviously. If on
Thus said "Constantine A. Murenin" on Thu, 03 Mar 2016 15:09:46 -0600:
> > The MTA will decide who will get foo-bar@.
>
> How? A /dev/mind RPC? :-)
Because the MTA is configured to handle it? :-)
> And what happens if a "conflicting" user gets created after a mail was
> sent, but before it was d
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 02:02:22PM -0600, Claus wrote:
> On 3/3/2016 3:14 AM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 01:54:16AM +0100, ropers wrote:
> >Won't question your need however this + vs - thing has come up often and
> >I'd like to stress out that even though both - and + are vali
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 01:39:54PM -0700, Andy Bradford wrote:
> Thus said Gilles Chehade on Thu, 03 Mar 2016 10:14:48 +0100:
>
> > Who should get mail for foo-bar@ ?
>
> The MTA will decide who will get foo-bar@.
>
How ?
> > This just doesn't happen with + because:
>
> It also doesn't happe
On 2 March 2016 at 14:19, Claus Niesen wrote:
> Sorry for the off topic question but I'm hoping that maybe some of your
> know of or work for an email hosting provider that provides minus/hyphen
> ("-") addressing with custom domain. All I can find are provider that
> offer plus addressing, which
On 3 March 2016 at 14:39, Andy Bradford wrote:
> Thus said Gilles Chehade on Thu, 03 Mar 2016 10:14:48 +0100:
>
>> Who should get mail for foo-bar@ ?
>
> The MTA will decide who will get foo-bar@.
How? A /dev/mind RPC? :-)
>> This just doesn't happen with + because:
>
> It also doesn't happen w
Thus said Gilles Chehade on Thu, 03 Mar 2016 10:14:48 +0100:
> Who should get mail for foo-bar@ ?
The MTA will decide who will get foo-bar@.
> This just doesn't happen with + because:
It also doesn't happen with an MTA that can figure these things out.
I don't see this as necessarily an argume
On 3/3/2016 3:14 AM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 01:54:16AM +0100, ropers wrote:
Won't question your need however this + vs - thing has come up often and
I'd like to stress out that even though both - and + are valid, use of -
introduces ambiguity given that - is allowed in user
On 3 March 2016 at 10:14, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
> - is allowed in usernames:
>
> $ doas useradd -m foo
> $ doas useradd -m foo-bar
>
> Who should get mail for foo-bar@ ?
>
> This just doesn't happen with + because:
>
> $ doas useradd -m bar
> $ doas useradd -m bar+baz
> useradd: `bar+ba
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 01:54:16AM +0100, ropers wrote:
> On 2 March 2016 at 23:59, Jason Barbier wrote:
>
> > [You're] probably going to have to suck it up at some point and use +
> > [delimiters] like most people have moved to doing since according to the
> > RFC - is a valid email address char
On 2 March 2016 at 23:59, Jason Barbier wrote:
> [You're] probably going to have to suck it up at some point and use +
> [delimiters] like most people have moved to doing since according to the
> RFC - is a valid email address char.
>
So is +.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3696#section-3
- is no
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016, at 12:19 PM, Claus Niesen wrote:
> Sorry for the off topic question but I'm hoping that maybe some of your
> know of or work for an email hosting provider that provides minus/hyphen
> ("-") addressing with custom domain. All I can find are provider that
> offer plus addressing
Sorry for the off topic question but I'm hoping that maybe some of your
know of or work for an email hosting provider that provides minus/hyphen
("-") addressing with custom domain. All I can find are provider that
offer plus addressing, which makes it hard for a smooth transition since
I'm using
20 matches
Mail list logo
