Re: OT: Quad Ethernet cards feedback on OpenBSD

2005-11-17 Thread Guido Tschakert

Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Sorry for this off topic question. Looking at the archive, SK (Henning 
love them! (;) is what look likes the best Ethernet cards to use, a few 
months ago anyway. The network cards are changing so quickly that what 
was true 6 months ago, may well not be today.


For quad, can someone confirmed, deny or offer alternative known to work 
well before I get 12 of them. Hopefully I may be able to fit them into 
the Sun X2100, but will see.


Also, any issue to run a minimum of 100 VLan on them? I didn't see issue 
in the archive, so I take it as been no problem! I don't think of any.


Any other suggestions is also welcome, I am more concern at the 
efficiency of the cards as they will be routing and supporting many VLan 
and PF will in some of the setup use individual VLan firewall 
configuration, up to 125 in one case. Will see if I can make that work 
well, not sure of my possible success, but will see...


Thanks for your time.



Hello,

the D-Link Card DFE-580TX works under OpenBSD, but their greatest 
advantage is that they are cheap (around 100 Euro in Germany).

Don't expect to much performance.
The are useful if you have to connect a lot of networks (with small 
traffic) and have not enough pci slots and money ;-)


I think you need something with better performance regarding to your setup.

guido



Re: OT: Quad Ethernet cards feedback on OpenBSD

2005-11-17 Thread Stephan Leemburg
The D-Link cards are bad and do not work well under OpenBSD (pre 3.8  
I haven't used them with 3.8). You should avoid them.


I had two in one firewall and one in another, I replaced them with  
Intel Pro cards, to get rid of frequent kernel panics.


I was planning to try to work on the driver, but the Intel cards just  
function that well that I think I'm not going to spend time on it.


--
Stephan


On 17-nov-2005, at 9:00, Guido Tschakert wrote:


Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Sorry for this off topic question. Looking at the archive, SK  
(Henning love them! (;) is what look likes the best Ethernet  
cards to use, a few months ago anyway. The network cards are  
changing so quickly that what was true 6 months ago, may well not  
be today.
For quad, can someone confirmed, deny or offer alternative known  
to work well before I get 12 of them. Hopefully I may be able to  
fit them into the Sun X2100, but will see.
Also, any issue to run a minimum of 100 VLan on them? I didn't see  
issue in the archive, so I take it as been no problem! I don't  
think of any.
Any other suggestions is also welcome, I am more concern at the  
efficiency of the cards as they will be routing and supporting  
many VLan and PF will in some of the setup use individual VLan  
firewall configuration, up to 125 in one case. Will see if I can  
make that work well, not sure of my possible success, but will see...

Thanks for your time.

Hello,

the D-Link Card DFE-580TX works under OpenBSD, but their greatest  
advantage is that they are cheap (around 100 Euro in Germany).

Don't expect to much performance.
The are useful if you have to connect a lot of networks (with small  
traffic) and have not enough pci slots and money ;-)


I think you need something with better performance regarding to  
your setup.


guido




Re: OT: Quad Ethernet cards feedback on OpenBSD

2005-11-17 Thread Johan P . Lindström
On 11/17/05, Stephan Leemburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The D-Link cards are bad and do not work well under OpenBSD (pre 3.8
 I haven't used them with 3.8). You should avoid them.

 I had two in one firewall and one in another, I replaced them with
 Intel Pro cards, to get rid of frequent kernel panics.

 I was planning to try to work on the driver, but the Intel cards just
 function that well that I think I'm not going to spend time on it.

 --
 Stephan


 On 17-nov-2005, at 9:00, Guido Tschakert wrote:

  Daniel Ouellet wrote:
  Sorry for this off topic question. Looking at the archive, SK
  (Henning love them! (;) is what look likes the best Ethernet
  cards to use, a few months ago anyway. The network cards are
  changing so quickly that what was true 6 months ago, may well not
  be today.
  For quad, can someone confirmed, deny or offer alternative known
  to work well before I get 12 of them. Hopefully I may be able to
  fit them into the Sun X2100, but will see.
  Also, any issue to run a minimum of 100 VLan on them? I didn't see
  issue in the archive, so I take it as been no problem! I don't
  think of any.
  Any other suggestions is also welcome, I am more concern at the
  efficiency of the cards as they will be routing and supporting
  many VLan and PF will in some of the setup use individual VLan
  firewall configuration, up to 125 in one case. Will see if I can
  make that work well, not sure of my possible success, but will see...
  Thanks for your time.
  Hello,
 
  the D-Link Card DFE-580TX works under OpenBSD, but their greatest
  advantage is that they are cheap (around 100 Euro in Germany).
  Don't expect to much performance.
  The are useful if you have to connect a lot of networks (with small
  traffic) and have not enough pci slots and money ;-)
 
  I think you need something with better performance regarding to
  your setup.
 
  guido


I do not agree, I have 10 or 12 D-Link DGE-530T running 3.7 atleast since CD
release time and no issues what so ever, they are attached as sk(4) devices
and I couldn't be a happier camper. Though that is most likely due to the
chipset, not D-Link as a brand. These cards are very cheap, some 20 euros a
pop in here in Sweden. Browse the OpenBSD metastore and/or the manual pages,
em(4) and sk(4) should get you started on your quest.

--
// Johan



Re: OT: Quad Ethernet cards feedback on OpenBSD

2005-11-17 Thread Shane J Pearson

Hi Johan,

On 17/11/2005, at 9:48 PM, Johan P. Lindstrvm wrote:


The D-Link cards are bad and do not work well under OpenBSD (pre 3.8
I haven't used them with 3.8). You should avoid them.



the D-Link Card DFE-580TX works under OpenBSD, but their greatest
advantage is that they are cheap (around 100 Euro in Germany).
Don't expect to much performance.


I do not agree, I have 10 or 12 D-Link DGE-530T running 3.7 atleast  
since CD
release time and no issues what so ever, they are attached as sk(4)  
devices
and I couldn't be a happier camper. Though that is most likely due  
to the
chipset, not D-Link as a brand. These cards are very cheap, some 20  
euros a
pop in here in Sweden. Browse the OpenBSD metastore and/or the  
manual pages,

em(4) and sk(4) should get you started on your quest.



He was talking about the 4 port DFE-580TX, which I have seen other
people complain about in the past.

Completely different to the DGE-530T.


Shane J Pearson



Re: OT: Quad Ethernet cards feedback on OpenBSD

2005-11-17 Thread Daniel Ouellet

Hi guys,

Thanks for the feedback so far. I wish there was more, but just a quick 
notes, that there is not point of arguing on talking about different 
cards. Just trying to find the very efficient dual or quad card that can 
route almost full capacity traffic is really the goal. Having a great 
card that work for a home setup is well, but not really what I am 
looking for. This is to pull out Cisco routers with FastEthernet 
interface and Gb interface in peering points, and to be replace by 
OpenBSD. So, efficiency and reliability is really the key. If there is 
very good feedback great, if not, I will just need to tests a few 
different one and see the results. The good news is that at a minimum, 
the cards are not thousand of $ each, so testing in the end take time 
and cost some, but nothing to kill about either. The bad side is that it 
may affect connectivity and that's not something I wish to do, so the 
testing needs to be minimal. After all testing with live customers is 
not nice! (:


I think having a card that use less CPU would be great as it's more 
likely to be more efficient, but will see. Keep the feedback coming, on 
the list or in private to reduce the noise is fine by me.


Thanks

Daniel



OT: Quad Ethernet cards feedback on OpenBSD

2005-11-16 Thread Daniel Ouellet
Sorry for this off topic question. Looking at the archive, SK (Henning 
love them! (;) is what look likes the best Ethernet cards to use, a few 
months ago anyway. The network cards are changing so quickly that what 
was true 6 months ago, may well not be today.


For quad, can someone confirmed, deny or offer alternative known to work 
well before I get 12 of them. Hopefully I may be able to fit them into 
the Sun X2100, but will see.


Also, any issue to run a minimum of 100 VLan on them? I didn't see issue 
in the archive, so I take it as been no problem! I don't think of any.


Any other suggestions is also welcome, I am more concern at the 
efficiency of the cards as they will be routing and supporting many VLan 
and PF will in some of the setup use individual VLan firewall 
configuration, up to 125 in one case. Will see if I can make that work 
well, not sure of my possible success, but will see...


Thanks for your time.



Re: OT: Quad Ethernet cards feedback on OpenBSD

2005-11-16 Thread Bill
Back in the summer when I was making this same decision, someone had
gotten some cards in from a vendor to test out... they were the SK
cards and I think they had gotten in a dual and a quad (marvell I am
thinking).  

I ended up going with Intel Pro quads, but since then there has been
talk of those not being right anymore.

I forget who had the cards... I am looking at getting a few more, so I
am interested in the results of this too.



On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 17:13:08 -0500
Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake:

 Sorry for this off topic question. Looking at the archive, SK (Henning 
 love them! (;) is what look likes the best Ethernet cards to use, a few 
 months ago anyway. The network cards are changing so quickly that what 
 was true 6 months ago, may well not be today.
 
 For quad, can someone confirmed, deny or offer alternative known to work 
 well before I get 12 of them. Hopefully I may be able to fit them into 
 the Sun X2100, but will see.
 
 Also, any issue to run a minimum of 100 VLan on them? I didn't see issue 
 in the archive, so I take it as been no problem! I don't think of any.
 
 Any other suggestions is also welcome, I am more concern at the 
 efficiency of the cards as they will be routing and supporting many VLan 
 and PF will in some of the setup use individual VLan firewall 
 configuration, up to 125 in one case. Will see if I can make that work 
 well, not sure of my possible success, but will see...
 
 Thanks for your time.
 


-- 

Bill Chmura
Director of Internet Technology
Explosivo ITG
Wolcott, CT

p: 860.621.8693
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w. http://www.explosivo.com