Re: OT: marco@ misc@ behavior Re: whiteboard over the net

2010-04-01 Thread Frans Haarman
Here's my top posting!

load averages:  0.32,  0.16,  0.1015:39:59
26 processes:  25 idle, 1 on processor
CPU states:  1.9% user,  0.0% nice,  0.3% system,  6.2% interrupt, 91.5%
idle
Memory: Real: 128M/338M act/tot  Free: 662M  Swap: 0K/2052M used/tot

  PID USERNAME PRI NICE  SIZE   RES STATEWAIT  TIMECPU COMMAND
27303 _isakmpd   20 3016K 2900K sleepselect  229:09  0.00% isakmpd
 6143 _snmpd 20   20M   20M sleepkqread  113:47  0.00% snmpd
15473 _bgpd  20   77M   78M sleeppoll 86:06  0.00% bgpd
10090 _syslogd   20  540K  716K sleeppoll 10:32  0.00% syslogd
 3107 root   20  568K 1256K sleepselect9:07  0.00% sshd
18607 _bgpd  20 1756K 2000K sleeppoll  5:07  0.00% bgpd
 3093 root   20  992K 1844K sleepselect2:22  0.00% sendmail
  592 root   20   20M   21M sleeppoll  3:06  0.00% bgpd
 9295 root   20  488K  792K idle select0:00  0.00% cron
   42 root   20  464K  748K idle select0:50  0.00% inetd
1 root  100  428K  324K idle wait  0:29  0.00% init
13536 _ntp   20  512K  796K idle poll  0:00  0.00% ntpd
 1405 root   20  712K  716K idle netio 0:02  0.00% syslogd
28634 root   20  420K  708K sleepnetio 0:00  0.00% comsat
  738 root   20  516K  732K idle poll  0:00  0.00% ntpd
27740 root   20 3372K 2608K sleepselect0:00  0.00% sshd
21831 root   20 1288K  584K idle netio 0:00  0.00% isakmpd
10319 root  180  496K  444K sleeppause 0:00  0.00% ksh


On 31 March 2010 16:12, Ahlsen-Girard, Edward F CTR USAF AFSOC AFSOC/A6OK 
edward.ahlsen-girard@hurlburt.af.mil wrote:

  Marco Peereboom wrote:
   Oh hai!
  
 
  Marco does it for the lulz.
   You know you don't have to read what I write you know.  If it irritates
   you that is your problem, not mine.  Feel free to ignore this.
  
   On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 09:52:46PM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
  
   On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us
 wrote:
  
   oooh that looks perfect; let me try that.
  
   On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 06:27:13PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
  
   On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Marco Peereboom 
 sl...@peereboom.us
 wrote:
  
   Drawing shit with the mouse. ?Not typing stuff with the keybored.
  
   webcanvas.com ?Just carve off a section as your territory, like
   http://webcanvas.com/100N600W#-228000,-3,0
  
  
   I understand that mr. peereboom (thinks he) is rather important to the
   obsd project . . . no doubt he (thinks) he is, but I was wondering if
   mr. peereboom ever thought about the silliness of top-posting (I'm
   sure he has and that's why he does it ;-).
  
   I've not been here that long, but it seems that his mailing list
   behavior is okay . . .?
  
   Other than his sarcasm, he has useful posts that are fucked up by his
   apparent need/desire to top post.
  
   Marco . . . can you please use accepted (i.e., rational) protocol from
   now on?  misc@ is not personal correspondence . . . many of us
   appreciate what goes on here and your top-posting is  . . . well . . .
   annoying (to say the least).


 Damn it, people, when I want to have the top-posting debate I'll have it
 with my brother.

 --
 Ed Ahlsen-Girard

 [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/x-pkcs7-signature
 which had a name of smime.p7s]



Re: OT: marco@ misc@ behavior Re: whiteboard over the net

2010-04-01 Thread Stas Miasnikou

Frans Haarman:

Here's my top posting!

load averages:  0.32,  0.16,  0.1015:39:59
26 processes:  25 idle, 1 on processor
CPU states:  1.9% user,  0.0% nice,  0.3% system,  6.2% interrupt, 91.5%
idle
Memory: Real: 128M/338M act/tot  Free: 662M  Swap: 0K/2052M used/tot

  PID USERNAME PRI NICE  SIZE   RES STATEWAIT  TIMECPU COMMAND
27303 _isakmpd   20 3016K 2900K sleepselect  229:09  0.00% isakmpd
 6143 _snmpd 20   20M   20M sleepkqread  113:47  0.00% snmpd
15473 _bgpd  20   77M   78M sleeppoll 86:06  0.00% bgpd
10090 _syslogd   20  540K  716K sleeppoll 10:32  0.00% syslogd
 3107 root   20  568K 1256K sleepselect9:07  0.00% sshd
18607 _bgpd  20 1756K 2000K sleeppoll  5:07  0.00% bgpd
 3093 root   20  992K 1844K sleepselect2:22  0.00% sendmail
  592 root   20   20M   21M sleeppoll  3:06  0.00% bgpd
 9295 root   20  488K  792K idle select0:00  0.00% cron
   42 root   20  464K  748K idle select0:50  0.00% inetd
1 root  100  428K  324K idle wait  0:29  0.00% init
13536 _ntp   20  512K  796K idle poll  0:00  0.00% ntpd
 1405 root   20  712K  716K idle netio 0:02  0.00% syslogd
28634 root   20  420K  708K sleepnetio 0:00  0.00% comsat
  738 root   20  516K  732K idle poll  0:00  0.00% ntpd
27740 root   20 3372K 2608K sleepselect0:00  0.00% sshd
21831 root   20 1288K  584K idle netio 0:00  0.00% isakmpd
10319 root  180  496K  444K sleeppause 0:00  0.00% ksh


Man, you've made my day! xD

Stas



Re: OT: marco@ misc@ behavior Re: whiteboard over the net

2010-04-01 Thread Chris Bennett

Frans Haarman wrote:

Here's my top posting!

load averages:  0.32,  0.16,  0.1015:39:59
26 processes:  25 idle, 1 on processor
CPU states:  1.9% user,  0.0% nice,  0.3% system,  6.2% interrupt, 91.5%
idle
Memory: Real: 128M/338M act/tot  Free: 662M  Swap: 0K/2052M used/tot

  PID USERNAME PRI NICE  SIZE   RES STATEWAIT  TIMECPU COMMAND
27303 _isakmpd   20 3016K 2900K sleepselect  229:09  0.00% isakmpd
 6143 _snmpd 20   20M   20M sleepkqread  113:47  0.00% snmpd
15473 _bgpd  20   77M   78M sleeppoll 86:06  0.00% bgpd
10090 _syslogd   20  540K  716K sleeppoll 10:32  0.00% syslogd
 3107 root   20  568K 1256K sleepselect9:07  0.00% sshd
18607 _bgpd  20 1756K 2000K sleeppoll  5:07  0.00% bgpd
 3093 root   20  992K 1844K sleepselect2:22  0.00% sendmail
  592 root   20   20M   21M sleeppoll  3:06  0.00% bgpd
 9295 root   20  488K  792K idle select0:00  0.00% cron
   42 root   20  464K  748K idle select0:50  0.00% inetd
1 root  100  428K  324K idle wait  0:29  0.00% init
13536 _ntp   20  512K  796K idle poll  0:00  0.00% ntpd
 1405 root   20  712K  716K idle netio 0:02  0.00% syslogd
28634 root   20  420K  708K sleepnetio 0:00  0.00% comsat
  738 root   20  516K  732K idle poll  0:00  0.00% ntpd
27740 root   20 3372K 2608K sleepselect0:00  0.00% sshd
21831 root   20 1288K  584K idle netio 0:00  0.00% isakmpd
10319 root  180  496K  444K sleeppause 0:00  0.00% ksh


  

I happen to agree that top posting is annoying.
But please!!
If you are going to top post top, please reverse the order of the output 
so that load averages are at the bottom not the top!


--
A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion,
butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance
accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders,
give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new
problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight
efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects.
  -- Robert Heinlein



Re: OT: marco@ misc@ behavior Re: whiteboard over the net

2010-04-01 Thread Jan Stary
On Apr 01 09:37:16, Chris Bennett wrote:
 Frans Haarman wrote:
 Here's my top posting!

 load averages:  0.32,  0.16,  0.1015:39:59
 26 processes:  25 idle, 1 on processor
 CPU states:  1.9% user,  0.0% nice,  0.3% system,  6.2% interrupt, 91.5%
 idle
 Memory: Real: 128M/338M act/tot  Free: 662M  Swap: 0K/2052M used/tot

   PID USERNAME PRI NICE  SIZE   RES STATEWAIT  TIMECPU COMMAND
 27303 _isakmpd   20 3016K 2900K sleepselect  229:09  0.00% isakmpd
  6143 _snmpd 20   20M   20M sleepkqread  113:47  0.00% snmpd
 15473 _bgpd  20   77M   78M sleeppoll 86:06  0.00% bgpd
 10090 _syslogd   20  540K  716K sleeppoll 10:32  0.00% syslogd
  3107 root   20  568K 1256K sleepselect9:07  0.00% sshd
 18607 _bgpd  20 1756K 2000K sleeppoll  5:07  0.00% bgpd
  3093 root   20  992K 1844K sleepselect2:22  0.00% sendmail
   592 root   20   20M   21M sleeppoll  3:06  0.00% bgpd
  9295 root   20  488K  792K idle select0:00  0.00% cron
42 root   20  464K  748K idle select0:50  0.00% inetd
 1 root  100  428K  324K idle wait  0:29  0.00% init
 13536 _ntp   20  512K  796K idle poll  0:00  0.00% ntpd
  1405 root   20  712K  716K idle netio 0:02  0.00% syslogd
 28634 root   20  420K  708K sleepnetio 0:00  0.00% comsat
   738 root   20  516K  732K idle poll  0:00  0.00% ntpd
 27740 root   20 3372K 2608K sleepselect0:00  0.00% sshd
 21831 root   20 1288K  584K idle netio 0:00  0.00% isakmpd
 10319 root  180  496K  444K sleeppause 0:00  0.00% ksh


   
 I happen to agree that top posting is annoying.
 But please!!
 If you are going to top post top, please reverse the order of the output  
 so that load averages are at the bottom not the top!

That would be pot posting. Hmmm 



Re: OT: marco@ misc@ behavior Re: whiteboard over the net

2010-03-31 Thread Ahlsen-Girard, Edward F CTR USAF AFSOC AFSOC/A6OK
 Marco Peereboom wrote:
  Oh hai!

 
 Marco does it for the lulz.
  You know you don't have to read what I write you know.  If it irritates
  you that is your problem, not mine.  Feel free to ignore this.
 
  On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 09:52:46PM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:

  On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us
wrote:
  
  oooh that looks perfect; let me try that.
 
  On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 06:27:13PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:

  On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us
wrote:
  
  Drawing shit with the mouse. ?Not typing stuff with the keybored.

  webcanvas.com ?Just carve off a section as your territory, like
  http://webcanvas.com/100N600W#-228000,-3,0
  

  I understand that mr. peereboom (thinks he) is rather important to the
  obsd project . . . no doubt he (thinks) he is, but I was wondering if
  mr. peereboom ever thought about the silliness of top-posting (I'm
  sure he has and that's why he does it ;-).
 
  I've not been here that long, but it seems that his mailing list
  behavior is okay . . .?
 
  Other than his sarcasm, he has useful posts that are fucked up by his
  apparent need/desire to top post.
 
  Marco . . . can you please use accepted (i.e., rational) protocol from
  now on?  misc@ is not personal correspondence . . . many of us
  appreciate what goes on here and your top-posting is  . . . well . . .
  annoying (to say the least).


Damn it, people, when I want to have the top-posting debate I'll have it
with my brother.

--
Ed Ahlsen-Girard

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/x-pkcs7-signature which 
had a name of smime.p7s]



OT: marco@ misc@ behavior Re: whiteboard over the net

2010-03-30 Thread Neal Hogan
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
 oooh that looks perfect; let me try that.

 On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 06:27:13PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
 On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us
wrote:
  Drawing shit with the mouse.  Not typing stuff with the keybored.

 webcanvas.com  Just carve off a section as your territory, like
 http://webcanvas.com/100N600W#-228000,-3,0



I understand that mr. peereboom (thinks he) is rather important to the
obsd project . . . no doubt he (thinks) he is, but I was wondering if
mr. peereboom ever thought about the silliness of top-posting (I'm
sure he has and that's why he does it ;-).

I've not been here that long, but it seems that his mailing list
behavior is okay . . .?

Other than his sarcasm, he has useful posts that are fucked up by his
apparent need/desire to top post.

Marco . . . can you please use accepted (i.e., rational) protocol from
now on?  misc@ is not personal correspondence . . . many of us
appreciate what goes on here and your top-posting is  . . . well . . .
annoying (to say the least).



Re: OT: marco@ misc@ behavior Re: whiteboard over the net

2010-03-30 Thread Marco Peereboom
Oh hai!

You know you don't have to read what I write you know.  If it irritates
you that is your problem, not mine.  Feel free to ignore this.

On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 09:52:46PM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
 On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
  oooh that looks perfect; let me try that.
 
  On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 06:27:13PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
  On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us 
  wrote:
   Drawing shit with the mouse. ?Not typing stuff with the keybored.
 
  webcanvas.com ?Just carve off a section as your territory, like
  http://webcanvas.com/100N600W#-228000,-3,0
 
 
 
 I understand that mr. peereboom (thinks he) is rather important to the
 obsd project . . . no doubt he (thinks) he is, but I was wondering if
 mr. peereboom ever thought about the silliness of top-posting (I'm
 sure he has and that's why he does it ;-).
 
 I've not been here that long, but it seems that his mailing list
 behavior is okay . . .?
 
 Other than his sarcasm, he has useful posts that are fucked up by his
 apparent need/desire to top post.
 
 Marco . . . can you please use accepted (i.e., rational) protocol from
 now on?  misc@ is not personal correspondence . . . many of us
 appreciate what goes on here and your top-posting is  . . . well . . .
 annoying (to say the least).



Re: OT: marco@ misc@ behavior Re: whiteboard over the net

2010-03-30 Thread Scott McEachern

Marco Peereboom wrote:

Oh hai!
  


Marco does it for the lulz.

You know you don't have to read what I write you know.  If it irritates
you that is your problem, not mine.  Feel free to ignore this.

On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 09:52:46PM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
  

On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:


oooh that looks perfect; let me try that.

On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 06:27:13PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
  

On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:


Drawing shit with the mouse. ?Not typing stuff with the keybored.
  

webcanvas.com ?Just carve off a section as your territory, like
http://webcanvas.com/100N600W#-228000,-3,0

  

I understand that mr. peereboom (thinks he) is rather important to the
obsd project . . . no doubt he (thinks) he is, but I was wondering if
mr. peereboom ever thought about the silliness of top-posting (I'm
sure he has and that's why he does it ;-).

I've not been here that long, but it seems that his mailing list
behavior is okay . . .?

Other than his sarcasm, he has useful posts that are fucked up by his
apparent need/desire to top post.

Marco . . . can you please use accepted (i.e., rational) protocol from
now on?  misc@ is not personal correspondence . . . many of us
appreciate what goes on here and your top-posting is  . . . well . . .
annoying (to say the least).



  



--
- RSM
www.erratic.ca



Re: OT: marco@ misc@ behavior Re: whiteboard over the net

2010-03-30 Thread Duncan Patton a Campbell
Ooohh, goody, the Top Posting Debate.  

Quite possibly the oldest troll on alt.flame!!!

And *every* time I see it I feel this witless 
compulsion to wonder just what the fuck this
 anotation convention 
is for, if not to allow replies to be interspersed 
in the original material with regard to subjective
context.

Dhu


On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 22:04:40 -0500
Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:

 Oh hai!
 
 You know you don't have to read what I write you know.  If it irritates
 you that is your problem, not mine.  Feel free to ignore this.
 
 On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 09:52:46PM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
  On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
   oooh that looks perfect; let me try that.
  
   On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 06:27:13PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
   On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us 
   wrote:
Drawing shit with the mouse. ?Not typing stuff with the keybored.
  
   webcanvas.com ?Just carve off a section as your territory, like
   http://webcanvas.com/100N600W#-228000,-3,0
  
  
  
  I understand that mr. peereboom (thinks he) is rather important to the
  obsd project . . . no doubt he (thinks) he is, but I was wondering if
  mr. peereboom ever thought about the silliness of top-posting (I'm
  sure he has and that's why he does it ;-).
  
  I've not been here that long, but it seems that his mailing list
  behavior is okay . . .?
  
  Other than his sarcasm, he has useful posts that are fucked up by his
  apparent need/desire to top post.
  
  Marco . . . can you please use accepted (i.e., rational) protocol from
  now on?  misc@ is not personal correspondence . . . many of us
  appreciate what goes on here and your top-posting is  . . . well . . .
  annoying (to say the least).