Am 29.03.2006 um 14:32 schrieb Falk Brockerhoff:
that, again, is sth nobody ever asked for or missed :)
however, the (completely untested except for compilation) diff below
should add set nexthop self.
Ui, you're realy fast :-) Thank you for your quick response. I'll
compile this and test
On 04/04/06, Falk Brockerhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 29.03.2006 um 14:32 schrieb Falk Brockerhoff:
that, again, is sth nobody ever asked for or missed :)
however, the (completely untested except for compilation) diff below
should add set nexthop self.
Ui, you're realy fast :-)
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 11:46:24AM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
On 04/04/06, Falk Brockerhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 29.03.2006 um 14:32 schrieb Falk Brockerhoff:
that, again, is sth nobody ever asked for or missed :)
however, the (completely untested except for compilation) diff
On 04/04/06, Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 11:46:24AM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
On 04/04/06, Falk Brockerhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 29.03.2006 um 14:32 schrieb Falk Brockerhoff:
that, again, is sth nobody ever asked for or missed :)
Hello,
I'm just playing around with OpenBGP on OpenBSD3.8. My BGP Session
comes up, MD5 works fine. OpenBGP is a intuitiv tool and works fine. :)
But I didn't find any documentation for migrating some parts of my
cisco config to openbgpd. I configured internal BGP between my core-
router
* Falk Brockerhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-29 12:38]:
Hello,
I'm just playing around with OpenBGP on OpenBSD3.8. My BGP Session
comes up, MD5 works fine. OpenBGP is a intuitiv tool and works fine. :)
But I didn't find any documentation for migrating some parts of my
cisco config to
Am 29.03.2006 um 14:11 schrieb Henning Brauer:
Hi Henning, hello list,
njet. we don't have any aggregate code, and you're the first one ever
to ask :)
Hm, it's unbelievable that I'm the first asking for aggregation :) I
can do aggregation on my core-router, but I think aggregation should
The second problem is, that I want to announce an external full-feed,
received with openbgpd, to my core-router. This works fine, but the
next-hop is the ip-adress of my external bgp-neighbor. But it should
be the ip-address of the border-router.
of course! you should have an IBGP that
On Cisco I configured
neighbor 10.0.0.2 next-hop-self, but how to do this with openbgp?
that, again, is sth nobody ever asked for or missed :)
however, the (completely untested except for compilation) diff below
should add set nexthop self.
Index: bgpd.h
How come Cisco doesn't send me the
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 01:33:15PM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
The second problem is, that I want to announce an external full-feed,
received with openbgpd, to my core-router. This works fine, but the
next-hop is the ip-adress of my external bgp-neighbor. But it should
be the
On 29/03/06, Falk Brockerhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 29.03.2006 um 14:11 schrieb Henning Brauer:
Hi Henning, hello list,
njet. we don't have any aggregate code, and you're the first one ever
to ask :)
Hm, it's unbelievable that I'm the first asking for aggregation :) I
can do
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 02:32:17PM +0200, Falk Brockerhoff wrote:
Am 29.03.2006 um 14:11 schrieb Henning Brauer:
Hi Henning, hello list,
njet. we don't have any aggregate code, and you're the first one ever
to ask :)
Hm, it's unbelievable that I'm the first asking for aggregation :) I
On 29/03/06, Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 01:33:15PM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
The second problem is, that I want to announce an external
full-feed,
received with openbgpd, to my core-router. This works fine, but the
next-hop is the ip-adress of
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 02:22:13PM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
On 29/03/06, Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 01:33:15PM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
The second problem is, that I want to announce an external
full-feed,
received with openbgpd, to my
On 29/03/06, Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did not talk about redistributing BGP information into an IGP (that's
totaly sick). I'm talking about the need for an IGP to glue your network
correctly together so that BGP is working as it should.
That was not what I was talking about
Falk Brockerhoff wrote:
Hello,
I'm just playing around with OpenBGP on OpenBSD3.8. My BGP Session comes
up, MD5 works fine. OpenBGP is a intuitiv tool and works fine. :)
Just a word of BIG caution on this MD5 usage. There was a bug corrected
in 3.9 for MD5 when the remote reset the session.
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Falk Brockerhoff wrote:
Hello,
I'm just playing around with OpenBGP on OpenBSD3.8. My BGP Session
comes up, MD5 works fine. OpenBGP is a intuitiv tool and works fine. :)
Just a word of BIG caution on this MD5 usage. There was a bug corrected
in 3.9 for MD5 when the
17 matches
Mail list logo
