.
Dan Farrell
Applied Innovations
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Alexey Suslikov
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 4:14 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: OpenBGPD in ISP-Planet's article
OpenBGPD/OpenBSD: Free
On Thursday 25 January 2007 12:25, Dan Farrell wrote:
hehehe I just realized I'm the DF that posted that originally... I
thought that all sounded too familiar! LOL. So if you disagree with
the points in that post, you can aim directly at me.
I've been mentioning OpenBGPD for awhile on the
OpenBGPD/OpenBSD: Free OpenBSD-based EGP/IGP routing platform.
Solid, secure, free, and very scalable. Again, you're operating without
vendor support. Non-standard of BGP functionality (modeled after PF).
Awesome integration with CARP and PF, makes for great firewalls, routers
and route servers.
Cool, but...
Alexey Suslikov wrote:
Non-standard of BGP functionality (modeled after PF).
What does that even mean? What is non-standard?
---
Lars Hansson
On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 17:46 +0800, Lars Hansson wrote:
What does that even mean? What is non-standard?
I think the article refers to the fact that OpenBGPd is integrated with
OpenBSD specific features like PF/CARP.
ciao
Luca
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 05:46:44PM +0800, Lars Hansson wrote:
Cool, but...
Alexey Suslikov wrote:
Non-standard of BGP functionality (modeled after PF).
What does that even mean? What is non-standard?
We don't do the Cisco CLI and route-map thing -- which is in my opinion a
very good thing.
Alexey Suslikov a icrit :
OpenBGPD/OpenBSD: Free OpenBSD-based EGP/IGP routing platform.
Solid, secure, free, and very scalable. Again, you're operating without
vendor support. Non-standard of BGP functionality (modeled after PF).
Awesome integration with CARP and PF, makes for great firewalls,
On 2007/01/24 17:46, Lars Hansson wrote:
Cool, but...
Alexey Suslikov wrote:
Non-standard of BGP functionality (modeled after PF).
What does that even mean? What is non-standard?
I think they mean it isn't an IOS clone...
Claudio Jeker wrote:
We don't do the Cisco CLI and route-map thing -- which is in my opinion a
very good thing.
Ah. I wasnt aware that those are in the standard though ;)
---
Lars
9 matches
Mail list logo