Re: PPTP after removing of userland ppp(8)

2014-03-21 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:57:57AM -0700, patrick keshishian wrote: > On 3/20/14, Stefan Sperling wrote: > [...] > > And, as goes without saying, if possible, please consider using a different > > protocol. PPTP's weaknesses have been well understood for a long time now. > > Much better alternativ

Re: PPTP after removing of userland ppp(8)

2014-03-20 Thread patrick keshishian
On 3/20/14, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2014-03-20, patrick keshishian wrote: >> On 3/20/14, Stefan Sperling wrote: >> [...] >>> And, as goes without saying, if possible, please consider using a >>> different >>> protocol. PPTP's weaknesses have been well understood for a long time >>> now. >>>

Re: PPTP after removing of userland ppp(8)

2014-03-20 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2014-03-20, patrick keshishian wrote: > On 3/20/14, Stefan Sperling wrote: > [...] >> And, as goes without saying, if possible, please consider using a different >> protocol. PPTP's weaknesses have been well understood for a long time now. >> Much better alternatives are available in the base

Re: PPTP after removing of userland ppp(8)

2014-03-20 Thread Theo de Raadt
> On 3/20/14, Stefan Sperling wrote: > [...] > > And, as goes without saying, if possible, please consider using a different > > protocol. PPTP's weaknesses have been well understood for a long time now. > > Much better alternatives are available in the base system and the ports > > tree. > > The

Re: PPTP after removing of userland ppp(8)

2014-03-20 Thread patrick keshishian
On 3/20/14, Stefan Sperling wrote: [...] > And, as goes without saying, if possible, please consider using a different > protocol. PPTP's weaknesses have been well understood for a long time now. > Much better alternatives are available in the base system and the ports > tree. The statement "much

Re: PPTP after removing of userland ppp(8)

2014-03-20 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 10:38:06AM +0200, Атанас Владимиров wrote: > Is the following patch correct: > A pptp client is available which interfaces with > -http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=pppd&sektion=8 > ">pppd(8) > +http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=ppp&sektion=8&manpath=

Re: PPTP after removing of userland ppp(8)

2014-03-20 Thread Атанас Владимиров
2014-03-20 1:15 GMT+02:00 Stefan Sperling : > > ppp(8) used net/pptp as a pseudo-device via pipes to a pptp process. > > With pppd(8) I don't think there is support for using a pipe to > a separate process as a device. Perhaps there is another way > to make pptp work with pppd. I don't know. > >

Re: PPTP after removing of userland ppp(8)

2014-03-19 Thread YASUOKA Masahiko
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 00:39:50 +0200 Атанас Владимиров wrote: > I was running PPTP client pptp-1.7.2p4 with userland ppp(8). It was a basic > setup from pptp(8) manual page and specifically "PPTP on a router" example. > What are my alternatives to run PPTP to connect to Microsoft VPN server? > May I

Re: PPTP after removing of userland ppp(8)

2014-03-19 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 12:39:50AM +0200, Атанас Владимиров wrote: > Hi, > I was running PPTP client pptp-1.7.2p4 with userland ppp(8). It was a basic > setup from pptp(8) manual page and specifically "PPTP on a router" example. > What are my alternatives to run PPTP to connect to Microsoft VPN ser

PPTP after removing of userland ppp(8)

2014-03-19 Thread Атанас Владимиров
Hi, I was running PPTP client pptp-1.7.2p4 with userland ppp(8). It was a basic setup from pptp(8) manual page and specifically "PPTP on a router" example. What are my alternatives to run PPTP to connect to Microsoft VPN server? May I use ppp(4) and pppd(8) and if so can you point me to the right d