Re: RAID Question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 So the resolution to this, barring some intermittent disk strangeness, is that I had a SATA cable with crap connex. No surprise. Silver stays shiny about 3 hours here. Dhu On Wed, 13 Jan 2021 19:19:40 -0700 Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wed, 13 Jan 2021 21:06:57 -0500 > Nick Holland wrote: > > > On 1/12/21 9:41 PM, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: > > > > > > Howdy all? I'm wondering if more than one RAID1 array is supported in > > > 6.7++ > > > > > > I'm having problems that could be bios limitations, OS, or a bad SATA > > > (Pwr?) cable. > > > Currently I'm going with the latter and rebuilding the RAID (again) but > > > was > > > just wondering if anyone has run a config with more than one RAID array... > > > ... > > > > > > Volume Status Size Device > > > softraid0 0 Rebuild 4000786694656 sd5 RAID1 3% done > > >0 Rebuild 4000786694656 0:0.0 noencl > > >1 Online 4000786694656 0:1.0 noencl > > > softraid0 1 Rebuild 2000396018176 sd6 RAID1 72% done > > >0 Rebuild 2000396018176 1:0.0 noencl > > >1 Online 2000396018176 1:1.0 noencl > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Dhu (dmesg attached, oh and Happy New Years to you;) > > > > /home/nick $ doas bioctl softraid0 > > Volume Status Size Device > > softraid0 0 Online 6001174724608 sd5 RAID1 > >0 Online 6001174724608 0:0.0 noencl > >1 Online 6001174724608 0:1.0 noencl > > softraid0 1 Online 4000786726912 sd6 RAID1 > >0 Online 4000786726912 1:0.0 noencl > >1 Online 4000786726912 1:1.0 noencl > > softraid0 2 Online 6001174323200 sd7 CRYPTO > >0 Online 6001174323200 2:0.0 noencl > > > > so ... uh...yeah. > > And yes, that crypto is on top a RAID1 set. Doing things wrong, I am. :) > > > > What's the problem you are having? > > > > That being said -- I did have some issues here that may have been related > > to a couple old disks of uncertain history. Pretty sure it ultimately > > boiled down to bad spot on this drive, different bad spot on that drive, > > and as a result, neither drive could rebuild onto the other. That > > definitely happens with RAID1. > > > > Nick. > > > > > Yes, Thank you. > It's good to know it'll work as it's stiiill chugging away ... > > Dhu > > > > - -- > Je suis Canadien. Ce n'est pas Francais ou Anglaise. > C'est une esp`ece de sauvage: ne obliviscaris, vix ea nostra voco;-) > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJf/6o8AAoJEI6Vun3D6YUP1ZIP/RIJ9+3Gm/LxLfkyCKJpBYs8 > YOMz5jJ2Jbar7guuL5NfrAxf5+8MMZTXSDTvYkF66u/ALXMRBPlJuzlRpt20x+pj > 9Y8tucbATXr+Vp+cgifY59Hc4g6oXGYaYxkaRtE9mVQ71/npBXzqDSwCxfhsQDGF > Sp7yld6JangxiLulws0opuG23Mvf+R+8mdesFI3xHxDDkQpDSYHuerzjj54E9yzk > k2k0CBw5gzNJ2vpWguEkSXbt6QX3nsWZ1fTc/aDK4btQmQFoWQpWU8aLAP9Wfi0J > k6H7oYgDteDCEJBZPB1G51Nr5smaXiz7pUyfF4fnW9MIJgQ4MQa9530ueCK9GExm > I5dtIPcuZYmxL05TI0YnlCFMljEWmBR/Ut6ry2ZT1AL0Mvh3ZBv2perab2Ooa0sv > SeQlPLnASHoaSSo+BCuaHxqbQ8kW0qXkFcrZFyJylJcPUj36k1ocVmLRqhPCb4OU > WrTxtOfHullk0B1gt0YcPohtJ+tMVh8aAROYgxFAz26PDtQ/uWiGbmfY9UbvcnA6 > /bUWBL7VBN2mLcg3iMp+hhaaT2KIWNOCxqVf9/hhSxNPZBgORvaUaWUQxSQTEUe5 > sNRFV8Z356G6Y3QKhfG9Ee1fW3MduUumwJzOkn30Kmym/EsmDKnuyOEUVR2+MdXO > tp3wZN9hJ45l1mIfz2yb > =ov1i > -END PGP SIGNATURE- - -- Je suis Canadien. Ce n'est pas Francais ou Anglaise. C'est une esp`ece de sauvage: ne obliviscaris, vix ea nostra voco;-) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJf/9S9AAoJEI6Vun3D6YUPh3sP/iXIUb+/idcay5j1HrefUl1P oLJkQSMkS3NaE64U/C/Bimk4Scdz/RwBwqHZJShJJqIO/vJfCg93x2bzsIgsMdRi H4vkXFnq4wbT+rKUKlMNF6Gd5FZFuzsfm+lLjdMaLZrl0yHbqxsxagmsuyMhZ8+L r9K9QD98MM74GDXDo0nnnx5IKKG3s5Z+YTdLlWRGzI/Im8CCBfflw/RuFO6EDx4Q hBGDrVnxaQL5xJhFMyjSdK3korwqSSPxaReNKTtIpuxeA6mK0nqSS2ikFIpxQqew hpyyIWacmCVkgwdSmkTS1hUkwzdGRKBVeZ69zHa7IpIES9u7UtrhHKfLrDdfdV6Z v69PxA3FDutVVX9ZZJTWlbmaXi+3PEjUI3CfLNZGS6MxDf5ftLDpGlU98YUSkjRW c9OEZAZaiqUozhY/TkSyHBWHUPpUAu58tC3dHs81UBm4BEmVX9jozc7l1DzCPKN2 3pm9C/3sGOktm91t89i4mLH/gevRu4sCFMvofBLilXWiRHigKjtasHbPch+j1rYX bWHron+aAR6WulD+exXkdlxxibGAh3DnF52wYW+47UOkd6s2+Mb4ePrN876FEpJH hlIUTAqbFXS6xqdrxsIm3hfsZYgWPJDwJu+foAWFSWL0GaNlooCmvoErlN1Y/jn+ wqWgvZr4dpxjGy7h2kyH =JcUG -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: RAID Question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 13 Jan 2021 21:06:57 -0500 Nick Holland wrote: > On 1/12/21 9:41 PM, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: > > > > Howdy all? I'm wondering if more than one RAID1 array is supported in 6.7++ > > > > I'm having problems that could be bios limitations, OS, or a bad SATA > > (Pwr?) cable. > > Currently I'm going with the latter and rebuilding the RAID (again) but was > > just wondering if anyone has run a config with more than one RAID array... > > ... > > > > Volume Status Size Device > > softraid0 0 Rebuild 4000786694656 sd5 RAID1 3% done > >0 Rebuild 4000786694656 0:0.0 noencl > >1 Online 4000786694656 0:1.0 noencl > > softraid0 1 Rebuild 2000396018176 sd6 RAID1 72% done > >0 Rebuild 2000396018176 1:0.0 noencl > >1 Online 2000396018176 1:1.0 noencl > > > > Thanks, > > > > Dhu (dmesg attached, oh and Happy New Years to you;) > > /home/nick $ doas bioctl softraid0 > Volume Status Size Device > softraid0 0 Online 6001174724608 sd5 RAID1 >0 Online 6001174724608 0:0.0 noencl >1 Online 6001174724608 0:1.0 noencl > softraid0 1 Online 4000786726912 sd6 RAID1 >0 Online 4000786726912 1:0.0 noencl >1 Online 4000786726912 1:1.0 noencl > softraid0 2 Online 6001174323200 sd7 CRYPTO >0 Online 6001174323200 2:0.0 noencl > > so ... uh...yeah. > And yes, that crypto is on top a RAID1 set. Doing things wrong, I am. :) > > What's the problem you are having? > > That being said -- I did have some issues here that may have been related > to a couple old disks of uncertain history. Pretty sure it ultimately > boiled down to bad spot on this drive, different bad spot on that drive, > and as a result, neither drive could rebuild onto the other. That > definitely happens with RAID1. > > Nick. > > Yes, Thank you. It's good to know it'll work as it's stiiill chugging away ... Dhu - -- Je suis Canadien. Ce n'est pas Francais ou Anglaise. C'est une esp`ece de sauvage: ne obliviscaris, vix ea nostra voco;-) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJf/6o8AAoJEI6Vun3D6YUP1ZIP/RIJ9+3Gm/LxLfkyCKJpBYs8 YOMz5jJ2Jbar7guuL5NfrAxf5+8MMZTXSDTvYkF66u/ALXMRBPlJuzlRpt20x+pj 9Y8tucbATXr+Vp+cgifY59Hc4g6oXGYaYxkaRtE9mVQ71/npBXzqDSwCxfhsQDGF Sp7yld6JangxiLulws0opuG23Mvf+R+8mdesFI3xHxDDkQpDSYHuerzjj54E9yzk k2k0CBw5gzNJ2vpWguEkSXbt6QX3nsWZ1fTc/aDK4btQmQFoWQpWU8aLAP9Wfi0J k6H7oYgDteDCEJBZPB1G51Nr5smaXiz7pUyfF4fnW9MIJgQ4MQa9530ueCK9GExm I5dtIPcuZYmxL05TI0YnlCFMljEWmBR/Ut6ry2ZT1AL0Mvh3ZBv2perab2Ooa0sv SeQlPLnASHoaSSo+BCuaHxqbQ8kW0qXkFcrZFyJylJcPUj36k1ocVmLRqhPCb4OU WrTxtOfHullk0B1gt0YcPohtJ+tMVh8aAROYgxFAz26PDtQ/uWiGbmfY9UbvcnA6 /bUWBL7VBN2mLcg3iMp+hhaaT2KIWNOCxqVf9/hhSxNPZBgORvaUaWUQxSQTEUe5 sNRFV8Z356G6Y3QKhfG9Ee1fW3MduUumwJzOkn30Kmym/EsmDKnuyOEUVR2+MdXO tp3wZN9hJ45l1mIfz2yb =ov1i -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: RAID Question
On 1/12/21 9:41 PM, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: Howdy all? I'm wondering if more than one RAID1 array is supported in 6.7++ I'm having problems that could be bios limitations, OS, or a bad SATA (Pwr?) cable. Currently I'm going with the latter and rebuilding the RAID (again) but was just wondering if anyone has run a config with more than one RAID array... ... Volume Status Size Device softraid0 0 Rebuild 4000786694656 sd5 RAID1 3% done 0 Rebuild 4000786694656 0:0.0 noencl 1 Online 4000786694656 0:1.0 noencl softraid0 1 Rebuild 2000396018176 sd6 RAID1 72% done 0 Rebuild 2000396018176 1:0.0 noencl 1 Online 2000396018176 1:1.0 noencl Thanks, Dhu (dmesg attached, oh and Happy New Years to you;) /home/nick $ doas bioctl softraid0 Volume Status Size Device softraid0 0 Online 6001174724608 sd5 RAID1 0 Online 6001174724608 0:0.0 noencl 1 Online 6001174724608 0:1.0 noencl softraid0 1 Online 4000786726912 sd6 RAID1 0 Online 4000786726912 1:0.0 noencl 1 Online 4000786726912 1:1.0 noencl softraid0 2 Online 6001174323200 sd7 CRYPTO 0 Online 6001174323200 2:0.0 noencl so ... uh...yeah. And yes, that crypto is on top a RAID1 set. Doing things wrong, I am. :) What's the problem you are having? That being said -- I did have some issues here that may have been related to a couple old disks of uncertain history. Pretty sure it ultimately boiled down to bad spot on this drive, different bad spot on that drive, and as a result, neither drive could rebuild onto the other. That definitely happens with RAID1. Nick.
RAID Question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Howdy all? I'm wondering if more than one RAID1 array is supported in 6.7++ I'm having problems that could be bios limitations, OS, or a bad SATA (Pwr?) cable. Currently I'm going with the latter and rebuilding the RAID (again) but was just wondering if anyone has run a config with more than one RAID array... ... Volume Status Size Device softraid0 0 Rebuild 4000786694656 sd5 RAID1 3% done 0 Rebuild 4000786694656 0:0.0 noencl 1 Online 4000786694656 0:1.0 noencl softraid0 1 Rebuild 2000396018176 sd6 RAID1 72% done 0 Rebuild 2000396018176 1:0.0 noencl 1 Online 2000396018176 1:1.0 noencl Thanks, Dhu (dmesg attached, oh and Happy New Years to you;) - -- Je suis Canadien. Ce n'est pas Francais ou Anglaise. C'est une esp`ece de sauvage: ne obliviscaris, vix ea nostra voco;-) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJf/l3hAAoJEI6Vun3D6YUPs4sP/j2r2n02I0szL9cLAMlpdq3f Jb+ua+IuC0ta0W5aJWU/4CKEC2iWykrstlO8jY/1KCObk0iH2kt6xqYWIRlS7ihF 059+62O95BJ/eYSUPE8cT2g4ieelmb7dzQnOIq122TTyMlps98y2hVITr7q9eYDw WEdpCeGKw2+PPTUuKUG25IgEV+353XMp/fnRHWi6q10tBtdQnMRl4hveWKNiy/SO dUV/9MdRLls6K6GEMLK++LSxBdbGayk37Vc4E68FWDseTl4bGmyc+MfPUT5C8ki9 25/S9u8B9pt9b62x97Fky6dS5UC02mAe7xQ7jmgMNG4hDuD+r+l2XZ81PI5hhSr3 uuyII/ZsoiD2huHNUvrVPlRU+SfZACqUc6UEpfj44qszB7NSb75mnkZel8hxUYZI EKe3UAk6t4p1bUpplo4y7nFBuAqtQEdN0mjmJKRAPk1oy7sXJq7IuaqJzhbyP3G1 qis/7cJo7xCgN9dUjd1jk3E9WwZxIvpXcZ8o4ztHQz635zOKWTYvkieFqxmWIGSw 8VCRr0+mk4O1mqz7ZLp3p5x/qrqID18zUzXiDswmubH50DaC8lNP09GHZIQT1HM9 toWN41t9LalWXmt04JEhnQkhg/Y33pMdsYb7j+Lrg7hLGWW2QC8HzIQTXfTTOKzy HOQ2V0UnCgqTDvbEvgxV =yVf+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- dmesg Description: Binary data
stupid sata raid question
Is there a good/cheap SATA RAID card that doesn't use that retarded soft RAID? In other words, will this card present itself to OBSD at install as a single disk? http://www.lsilogic.com/products/megaraid/sata_150_4.html --Bryan
Re: stupid sata raid question
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Bryan Irvine wrote: Is there a good/cheap SATA RAID card that doesn't use that retarded soft RAID? In other words, will this card present itself to OBSD at install as a single disk? http://www.lsilogic.com/products/megaraid/sata_150_4.html yes, -Otto
Re: generel software RAID-Question (IBMx330, raid failed, where to look for errors? )
That's nice to hear, got three of them with adaptec without an excuse for existence in my hall, I think, perhaps it's time to investigate that, there might be a use for them after all... On 8/5/05, Richard Welty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 5 Aug 2005 12:43:10 +0200 Johan P. Lindstrvm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The IBM e-server x330 usually sports a branded Adaptec SCSI RAID card (IBM ServeRAID) and... well google the archives if you haven't been following thie list. um, the onboard controller is an adaptec, but the rebranded scsi raid card is generally a mylex in these beasts, not an adaptec. richard -- Richard Welty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Averill Park Networking Java, PHP, PostgreSQL, Unix, Linux, IP Network Engineering, Security Well, if you're not going to expect unexpected flames, what's the point of going anywhere? -- Truckle the Uncivil
Re: generel software RAID-Question (IBMx330, raid failed, where to look for errors? )
The IBM e-server x330 usually sports a branded Adaptec SCSI RAID card (IBM ServeRAID) and... well google the archives if you haven't been following thie list. Anywho, IBM servers have plenty of HW failure checks, it's a 1U case we are talking about no? just look on the inside of the lid panel and you should have a big nice blueprint of the layout. Last week there was a qusetion about raidframe and it appears there are no known issues with raidframe and the src has not needed a polish for two or three years, so you are probably looking at a hw or config failure. On 8/3/05, Stephan Tesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Mittwoch, 3. August 2005 02:11 schrieben Sie: Hi Sebastian, Are there any problems known with the raidframe-device? Not that I know of. In my case: I've a IBM X330 with dual P3 800Mhz and 2 SCSI-HDDs. One is about 160Gb and the other is smaler. I created a raid for the /home but today the server stoped working. I've just remote acces so the tecnican (a guy I know) told me the server wont boot up and stops during raid-initialisation. Did it really stop, or was it just rebuilding the array after an unclean shutdown? Did he try abort that operation (ctrl-c)? I ask because RAIDframe isn't in the default-Kernel so I'm not sure if it's a good choice for productiv servers. I would be happy if somebody with much more experience would give me some hints where to look for potential errors. I've got RAIDframe running for a couple of months now on my web/mailserver on sparc64, and it is rock solid. Never had a problem with it so far. A better description what really happens when you boot the server would be nice. E.g. what messages do you see on the console, is there any activity on the hdd's, does the server pass the BIOS tests, etc. Regards, Stephan
Re: generel software RAID-Question (IBMx330, raid failed, where to look for errors? )
On Fri, 5 Aug 2005 12:43:10 +0200 Johan P. Lindstrvm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The IBM e-server x330 usually sports a branded Adaptec SCSI RAID card (IBM ServeRAID) and... well google the archives if you haven't been following thie list. um, the onboard controller is an adaptec, but the rebranded scsi raid card is generally a mylex in these beasts, not an adaptec. richard -- Richard Welty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Averill Park Networking Java, PHP, PostgreSQL, Unix, Linux, IP Network Engineering, Security Well, if you're not going to expect unexpected flames, what's the point of going anywhere? -- Truckle the Uncivil
Re: generel software RAID-Question (IBMx330, raid failed, where to look for errors? )
Am Mittwoch, 3. August 2005 02:11 schrieben Sie: Hi Sebastian, Are there any problems known with the raidframe-device? Not that I know of. In my case: I've a IBM X330 with dual P3 800Mhz and 2 SCSI-HDDs. One is about 160Gb and the other is smaler. I created a raid for the /home but today the server stoped working. I've just remote acces so the tecnican (a guy I know) told me the server wont boot up and stops during raid-initialisation. Did it really stop, or was it just rebuilding the array after an unclean shutdown? Did he try abort that operation (ctrl-c)? I ask because RAIDframe isn't in the default-Kernel so I'm not sure if it's a good choice for productiv servers. I would be happy if somebody with much more experience would give me some hints where to look for potential errors. I've got RAIDframe running for a couple of months now on my web/mailserver on sparc64, and it is rock solid. Never had a problem with it so far. A better description what really happens when you boot the server would be nice. E.g. what messages do you see on the console, is there any activity on the hdd's, does the server pass the BIOS tests, etc. Regards, Stephan
generel software RAID-Question (IBMx330, raid failed, where to look for errors? )
Are there any problems known with the raidframe-device? In my case: I've a IBM X330 with dual P3 800Mhz and 2 SCSI-HDDs. One is about 160Gb and the other is smaler. I created a raid for the /home but today the server stoped working. I've just remote acces so the tecnican (a guy I know) told me the server wont boot up and stops during raid-initialisation. I've no further details and get my box back (today). Then I'll investigate it much more.. I don't think the HDDs are brocken because I obsoleted the server personaly and I hopefully know what I do. So I just wanna like to know if there's maybe any problem known or if maybe somebody has similiar experience (because the IBM-Servers). I would also happy if somebody could provide me e.g. some hints where to look for potential problems (Problems I maybe didn't noticed during my checks, just 2 months ago). I ask because RAIDframe isn't in the default-Kernel so I'm not sure if it's a good choice for productiv servers. I would be happy if somebody with much more experience would give me some hints where to look for potential errors. It's the first and only raid I ever set up (software-raid) so my experience with raidframe is very limited. I'll try to make the raid working again at first with a spec. bootfloppy. Before I'll do that I'll take a look in the BIOS for error-codes. Is there something else I should/can do before I start to rebuild the raid to figure out what exactly happened if the BIOS wont give me a hint? I wont belive that it's a HDD-Error because before I moved home (I visited a friend) I checked the HDDs and FS via fsck and co for errors and I got no errors nor bad blocks... and 5 hrs later the server stoped working. :-( Kind regards, Sebastian
