Hi,
You will find the answer in the second paragraph of the description for
the dhcrelay(8) manpage.
It's fantastic that we don't even need the internet to find the answer.
Happy reading.
Joe
On 30/08/2019 8:21 AM, shadrock uhuru wrote:
hiya
thanks for the reply
hi eveyone
if i have a dh
hiya
thanks for the reply
> hi eveyone
> if i have a dhcp server in subnet A connected to interface em0 (lan) and
> subnet B connected to interface iwn0 (wireless zone) on the router
> with dhcrelay -i em0 running on the router should the wireless subnet be
> able?? to get its dhcp address from the
he lan ?
> > No, you would need to run
> >
> >dhcrelay -i iwn0
> >
> > to do that.
> >
> > Subject:
> > Re: dhcrelay
> > From:
> > Sebastian Benoit
> > Date:
> > 8/23/19, 10:12 PM
> >
> thank Sebastian
> i have two
ss zone) on the router
>> with dhcrelay -i em0 running on the router should the wireless subnet be
>> able?? to get its dhcp address from the dhcp server on the lan ?
> No, you would need to run
>
>dhcrelay -i iwn0
>
> to do that.
>
> Subject:
> Re: dhcrelay
shadrock uhuru(niyal...@gmail.com) on 2019.08.23 18:46:32 +0100:
> hi eveyone
> if i have a dhcp server in subnet A connected to interface em0 (lan) and
> subnet B connected to interface iwn0 (wireless zone) on the router
> with dhcrelay -i em0 running on the router should the wireless subnet be
>
Hi Riccardo,
dhrelay only operates on a single interface, so you're not missing anything
there.
Can you show me the ps output for the dhcrelay processes you start? The rcctl
commands you show below don't include the rcctl start dhcrelay and
dhcrelay_second bits.
I have the following in rc.loc
Am 15.06.2018 10:27 schrieb Holger Glaess:
ist see the forwarded bootreqest from dhcrelay but it is not possible ,
for me ,
to shift this reqest to an other rdom .
just lift the outgoing (directed) request from dhcrelay with pf?
--
pb
> On 05.07.2017, at 11:50, Kapetanakis Giannis
> wrote:
>
> On 05/07/17 12:45, Reyk Floeter wrote:
>>
>>> On 05.07.2017, at 11:41, Kapetanakis Giannis
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 04/07/17 19:09, Reyk Floeter wrote:
Could you try again with the attached diff? It doesn't change
behavior
On 05/07/17 12:45, Reyk Floeter wrote:
>
>> On 05.07.2017, at 11:41, Kapetanakis Giannis
>> wrote:
>>
>> On 04/07/17 19:09, Reyk Floeter wrote:
>>> Could you try again with the attached diff? It doesn't change
>>> behavior but it adds some chatty logging when a packet is rejected.
>>> Maybe it
> On 05.07.2017, at 11:41, Kapetanakis Giannis
> wrote:
>
> On 04/07/17 19:09, Reyk Floeter wrote:
>> Could you try again with the attached diff? It doesn't change
>> behavior but it adds some chatty logging when a packet is rejected.
>> Maybe it helps to find the issue.
>>
>> Reyk
>
> I've
On 04/07/17 19:09, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> Could you try again with the attached diff? It doesn't change
> behavior but it adds some chatty logging when a packet is rejected.
> Maybe it helps to find the issue.
>
> Reyk
I've send the bug report as detailed as I could.
In a few words, applying you
On 04/07/17 19:09, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> First of all, please send a proper bug reports to bugs@, not misc.
> "It used to work but now it doesn't" is not very helpful.
>
> Could you share your actual configuration or, even better, provide a
> simplified way to reproduce your problem? rzalamena, m
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 02:41:30PM +0300, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just upgraded a set of my firewalls that also do dhcrelay to -current.
>
> The program stopped working ok. Some dhcp requests where being forwarded some
> not.
>
> tcpdump was showing the request on internal int
On 20/02/16 13:52, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Are the carp interfaces "up" (i.e. master) when you see these messages?
Yes always.
On both firewalls I have net.inet.carp.log=3 and I haven't logged any
carp up/down - MASTER/BACKUP transition messages.
On the other hand, on backup firewall I just
On 2016-02-18, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
> On 12/02/16 18:56, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> On 2016-02-12, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have a carped firewall which is using dhcrelay to forward dhcp
>>> requests to another carped dhcp server.
>>> After upgrade to Feb 4 snapshot I'm
On 18/02/16 15:52, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
On 18/02/16 13:22, Peter Hessler wrote:
How many bpf devices do you have? You may need to create more.
I have 20 bpf devices, 27 vlan interfaces, 27 carp interfaces, 17
dhcrelay processes.
wasn't there a message when bpf devides were short?
On 18/02/16 13:22, Peter Hessler wrote:
On 2016 Feb 18 (Thu) at 12:25:07 +0200 (+0200), Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
:On 12/02/16 18:56, Stuart Henderson wrote:
:>On 2016-02-12, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
:>>Hi,
:>>
:>>I have a carped firewall which is using dhcrelay to forward dhcp
:>>requests to
On 2016 Feb 18 (Thu) at 12:25:07 +0200 (+0200), Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
:On 12/02/16 18:56, Stuart Henderson wrote:
:>On 2016-02-12, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
:>>Hi,
:>>
:>>I have a carped firewall which is using dhcrelay to forward dhcp
:>>requests to another carped dhcp server.
:>>After upgr
On 12/02/16 18:56, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2016-02-12, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
Hi,
I have a carped firewall which is using dhcrelay to forward dhcp
requests to another carped dhcp server.
After upgrade to Feb 4 snapshot I'm seeing these in my logs:
What version were you running before?
On 2016-02-13, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
> On 12/02/16 18:56, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> On 2016-02-12, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have a carped firewall which is using dhcrelay to forward dhcp
>>> requests to another carped dhcp server.
>>> After upgrade to Feb 4 snapshot I'm
On 12/02/16 18:56, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2016-02-12, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
Hi,
I have a carped firewall which is using dhcrelay to forward dhcp
requests to another carped dhcp server.
After upgrade to Feb 4 snapshot I'm seeing these in my logs:
What version were you running before?
On 2016-02-12, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a carped firewall which is using dhcrelay to forward dhcp
> requests to another carped dhcp server.
> After upgrade to Feb 4 snapshot I'm seeing these in my logs:
What version were you running before?
To establish whether it's a dhcrel
On 02/12/16 12:15, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
I have a carped firewall which is using dhcrelay to forward dhcp
requests to another carped dhcp server.
After upgrade to Feb 4 snapshot I'm seeing these in my logs:
Feb 8 21:00:04 dhcrelay: send_packet: No buffer space available
Feb 9 16:47:02
if i'm not mistaken, it's Berkeley Packet Filter.
I must do the same issue for dhcpd when i use many vlan interfaces and
PF :)
--
Cordialement,
Loïc BLOT, UNIX systems, security and network expert
http://www.unix-experience.fr
Le mardi 08 janvier 2013 à 20:39 +0100, Ulrich Drolshagen a écrit
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 06:37:45PM +0100, Ulrich Drolshagen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running an openbsd router attached to several vlans. On one of
> them there is running a box with an isc-dhcp server.
> For one of the vlans I have started a dhcrelay to forward the dhcp
> broadcasts of the respecti
Am 08.01.2013 19:48, schrieb Janne Johansson:
cd /dev
for i in $(jot 20 10); do ./MAKEDEV bpf${i} ; done
to make 20 more bpfs. Each tcpdump and dhcrelay will want one of their
own so you may need more dev-entries.
Thank you, this did the trick. I really didn't know what "bpf" are and
didn't thin
cd /dev
for i in $(jot 20 10); do ./MAKEDEV bpf${i} ; done
to make 20 more bpfs. Each tcpdump and dhcrelay will want one of their
own so you may need more dev-entries.
2013/1/8 Ulrich Drolshagen :
> Hi,
>
> I am running an openbsd router attached to several vlans. On one of them
> there is runnin
On 2011-11-09, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 05:36:54PM +0100, Comhte wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In 4.9, i used to start dhcrelay using /etc/rc.local like this:
>>
>> /usr/sbin/dhcrelay -i vlan2 10.0.45.11
>> /usr/sbin/dhcrelay -i vlan5 10.0.45.11
>> /usr/sbin/dhcrelay -i vlan7 10.0
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 05:36:54PM +0100, Comhte wrote:
Hi,
In 4.9, i used to start dhcrelay using /etc/rc.local like this:
/usr/sbin/dhcrelay -i vlan2 10.0.45.11
/usr/sbin/dhcrelay -i vlan5 10.0.45.11
/usr/sbin/dhcrelay -i vlan7 10.0.45.11
/usr/sbin/dhcrelay -i vlan100 10.11.1.8 10.22.1.8
/usr
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 05:36:54PM +0100, Comhte wrote:
Hi,
In 4.9, i used to start dhcrelay using /etc/rc.local like this:
/usr/sbin/dhcrelay -i vlan2 10.0.45.11
/usr/sbin/dhcrelay -i vlan5 10.0.45.11
/usr/sbin/dhcrelay -i vlan7 10.0.45.11
/usr/sbin/dhcrelay -i vlan100 10.11.1.8 10.22.1.8
/usr
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 05:36:54PM +0100, Comhte wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In 4.9, i used to start dhcrelay using /etc/rc.local like this:
>
> /usr/sbin/dhcrelay -i vlan2 10.0.45.11
> /usr/sbin/dhcrelay -i vlan5 10.0.45.11
> /usr/sbin/dhcrelay -i vlan7 10.0.45.11
> /usr/sbin/dhcrelay -i vlan100 10.11.1.8
Am 14.03.2008 um 08:13 schrieb Marc Balmer:
Falk Brockerhoff - smartTERRA GmbH wrote:
I think a good solutions is to look if the given interface is a
carp interface and to figure out the carpdev interface. Then this
can be used to listen on. But my programming skills are really
poor, else
Hi,
I think a good solutions is to look if the given interface is a carp
interface and to figure out the carpdev interface. Then this can be
used to listen on. But my programming skills are really poor, else I
would provide a patch...
Regards,
Falk
33 matches
Mail list logo
