On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 01:08:04 -0400, Brad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 09:43:29PM -0700, J.C. Roberts wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 21:10:53 -0400, Nick Holland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is just *no* way to explain just how wacked Linux looks to someone
who is having to
On 7/22/2005 at 9:10 PM Nick Holland wrote:
| There is just *no* way to explain just how wacked Linux looks to
| someone who is having to go from OpenBSD to Linux for some stuff
| at work. Wow.
| You'd swear it was written by an unorganized mob with no central
| control or plan at all. Oh,
--- MikeM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/22/2005 at 9:10 PM Nick Holland wrote:
| There is just *no* way to explain just how wacked Linux looks to
| someone who is having to go from OpenBSD to Linux for some stuff
| at work. Wow.
| You'd swear it was written by an unorganized mob with no
On 7/21/05, Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:35:27 -0500
Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be blunt, because when an enterprise just needs pure unfiltered
inter-VLAN routing, Cisco has CEF products which can route between
interfaces at bps and pps rates
* Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-22 09:53]:
On 7/21/05, Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:35:27 -0500
Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be blunt, because when an enterprise just needs pure unfiltered
inter-VLAN routing, Cisco has CEF products which can route
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 02:31:23 -0500
Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fine, so you don't like Cisco.
No sane person *likes* Cisco gear.
Substitute Raptor or Juniper or some other
product that can do basic Inter-VLAN routing at 100,000 packets/second
in even their low end products,
Dude, there
On 7/22/05, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regardless of whether you use the walks-on-water SysKonnect cards or
crappy $470 Intel quad-EM cards, OpenBSD on i386 barely approaches
half that rate, when doing nothing more than routing packets from one
interface to another (but I'd
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 02:31:23 -0500 Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fine, so you don't like Cisco. Substitute Raptor or Juniper or some
other product that can do basic Inter-VLAN routing at 100,000 packets/
second in even their low end products, That doesn't change the
facts, just the brand
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 08:48:11AM -0400, Joe . wrote:
On 7/22/05, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
100Kpps should be reachable with the right hardware right now.
there is room for optimization in OpenBSD to reach way higher
forwarding rates.
Part of the problem here is
On 7/22/05, Spruell, Darren-Perot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think, quite the opposite, that it's fine the way it is. It's not
openbsd's fault that people fall prey to the stupid knob-tuning game and
quite dumbly follow that line of thought. I think instead that the other
OSes should be
On Friday 22 July 2005 01:23 pm, Spruell, Darren-Perot wrote:
From: Joe . [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
are used to dealing with complex or unoptimized piles of crap. Part of
encouraging people to switch should at the very least be communicating
that there are no hidden options or that
From: Joe . [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think, quite the opposite, that it's fine the way it is. It's not
openbsd's fault that people fall prey to the stupid
knob-tuning game and
quite dumbly follow that line of thought. I think instead
that the other
OSes should be responsible for
Spruell, Darren-Perot wrote:
From: Joe . [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
I agree with you completely and in a sane and rational world it would
happen just like that. Unfortunately I highly doubt we'll see any such
disclaimers though. I bet there are lots of people eager to defect and
it would
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 21:10:53 -0400, Nick Holland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is just *no* way to explain just how wacked Linux looks to someone
who is having to go from OpenBSD to Linux for some stuff at work. Wow.
You'd swear it was written by an unorganized mob with no central
control or
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 09:43:29PM -0700, J.C. Roberts wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 21:10:53 -0400, Nick Holland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is just *no* way to explain just how wacked Linux looks to someone
who is having to go from OpenBSD to Linux for some stuff at work. Wow.
You'd
15 matches
Mail list logo
