On Jan 29, 2008 9:20 PM, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30/01/2008, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
awesome. just discovered that gmail's spam filter is a fast learner.
by marking the first test emails spam, i haven't seen the other posts.
I've always just clicked Delete instead.
Marc Balmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That has the quality to go into fortune (where we already have
some limericks)
yes, fortune may be more appropriate. it does deserve some sort of
prominent display, though :)
- P
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 01:30:21PM +0100, Marc Balmer wrote:
Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
Darrin Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There once was a message to test
Repeated unto being a pest
While marked to ignore
It was seen more and more
Until other begged, Give it a rest!
That
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 01:30:21PM +0100, Marc Balmer sez:
Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
Darrin Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There once was a message to test
Repeated unto being a pest
While marked to ignore
It was seen more and
Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
Darrin Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There once was a message to test
Repeated unto being a pest
While marked to ignore
It was seen more and more
Until other begged, Give it a rest!
That one needs to be included in the faq somewhere, urgently.
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 10:40:06AM -0600, Denny White wrote:
Though warned not to test on the list,
The rascal just couldn't resist.
If you mean me - thanks, Danny; I love you too.
1. Any test messages, which I've sent, reached the list several hours (some
even more than 24) after submission
On Jan 29, 2008 11:38 AM, Zbigniew Baniewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4. It's really a pity, that *all* (?) of you prefer to see my difficulties
as some kind of bad will or list abuse; and nowhere could I see a
message like: perhaps he needs some help?. I don't want to believe, this
is usual
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 07:38:59PM +0100, Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
Just out of curiosity: what really a difference can you see between my tests
- and this, for example, thread, whish is just about nothing (limericks)?
I can see at least one: I *had* to make some tests, I was in contact with
On Tuesday 29 January 2008, Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
That's the second - and last - explaining from my side. I want to
add, that such (over)reaction of several persons is very
disappointing to me.
there once was a Pole without humor
uptight as if he had tumors
again he sent mail
in spite of
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 03:22:24PM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote:
Please restart humord(1) before reading this list or you will continue
to be very disappointed. (;
Well, OK - let's get over it... ;)
--
pozdrawiam / regards
On Jan 29, 2008 1:47 PM, Marti Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not everyone flamed you -- most of us (myself included) ignored your
initial email(s) as a minor irritation. But count me among the
arrogant assholes who *were* annoyed by it.
awesome. just discovered that gmail's spam filter is
Yep,
On Jan 29, 2008 2:06 AM, Darrin Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There once was a message to test
Repeated unto being a pest
While marked to ignore
It was seen more and more
Until other begged, Give it a rest!
Someone had to say it.
--
Best Regards
Edd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 07:38:59PM +0100, Zbigniew Baniewski sez:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 10:40:06AM -0600, Denny White wrote:
Though warned not to test on the list,
The rascal just couldn't resist.
If you mean me - thanks, Danny; I love you
On 30/01/2008, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
awesome. just discovered that gmail's spam filter is a fast learner.
by marking the first test emails spam, i haven't seen the other posts.
I've always just clicked Delete instead. I don't acutally know
Gmail's spam filter algorithm, but I've
There once was a message to test
Repeated unto being a pest
While marked to ignore
It was seen more and more
Until other begged, Give it a rest!
--
Darrin Chandler| Phoenix BSD User Group | MetaBUG
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://phxbug.org/ |
Darrin Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There once was a message to test
Repeated unto being a pest
While marked to ignore
It was seen more and more
Until other begged, Give it a rest!
That one needs to be included in the faq somewhere, urgently.
- P
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen,
16 matches
Mail list logo