Paul de Weerd wrote:
[snip]
Depending on the origin and contents of the presentation you can :
1) Tell the originator to stop sending you MS docs
In the long run, this is the most advantageous. PDF/A is an option for
read-only. For those stuck on legacy applications and a need
http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/05/air-force-mater.html
On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 10:21 +0100, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/05/air-force-mater.html
That reminds me of a story where investigators were stumped for 3 months
trying to get data off a 1541 5.25 drive connected to a Commodore 64. I
wish I could find the link to it.
On 2008. May 16. 11:59:33 Tim Post wrote:
On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 10:21 +0100, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/05/air-force-mater.html
That reminds me of a story where investigators were stumped for 3
months trying to get data off a 1541 5.25 drive connected to a
I'm not so worried about that particular project (for obvious
reasons), but I have been putting together a plan to move anything
that talks to the world to OBSD.
Then, when everyone will use OpenBSD, and have calmed down, the devs
will unhide a super-secret secretly hidden remote
* L?VAI D?niel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-16 13:40:13]:
On 2008. May 16. 11:59:33 Tim Post wrote:
On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 10:21 +0100, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/05/air-force-mater.html
That reminds me of a story where investigators were stumped for 3
months
Travers Buda wrote:
Well, in a way, diversity of operating systems is a good thing in
terms of security. However, if the diverse population is made up
of buggy crap, then you see less of a benefit. The worst case
scenario is when you have a single operating system having a majority,
and being
Hello Daniel,
On 5/16/08 8:54 PM, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
I know at time it was said that OpenBSD is not for everything, but so
far, I still haven't find anything that I need that OpenBSD can't shine
doing.
Not to challenge you or anyone else personally: What's the best program
to look at
On Fri, 16 May 2008 22:35:00 +0200
chefren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know at time it was said that OpenBSD is not for everything, but
so far, I still haven't find anything that I need that OpenBSD
can't shine doing.
I can almost second that except for the few cases in which we really
need to
Rico Secada wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2008 22:35:00 +0200
chefren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know at time it was said that OpenBSD is not for everything, but
so far, I still haven't find anything that I need that OpenBSD
can't shine doing.
I can almost second that except for the few cases in
On Fri, 16 May 2008, chefren wrote:
Hello Daniel,
On 5/16/08 8:54 PM, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
I know at time it was said that OpenBSD is not for everything, but so far,
I still haven't find anything that I need that OpenBSD can't shine doing.
Not to challenge you or anyone else personally:
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 10:35:00PM +0200, chefren wrote:
Hello Daniel,
On 5/16/08 8:54 PM, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
I know at time it was said that OpenBSD is not for everything, but so far,
I still haven't find anything that I need that OpenBSD can't shine doing.
Not to challenge you or
On Fri, 16 May 2008 17:48:47 -0400
Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rico Secada wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2008 22:35:00 +0200
chefren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know at time it was said that OpenBSD is not for everything, but
so far, I still haven't find anything that I need that
On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 23:26 +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2008 22:35:00 +0200
chefren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know at time it was said that OpenBSD is not for everything, but
so far, I still haven't find anything that I need that OpenBSD
can't shine doing.
I can almost
14 matches
Mail list logo
