Hey did you hear that in Windows vista they implemented ASLR , somethink
similar to the technology of random memory allocation in open bsd. So I gues
Windows is copying bsd. Cool.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey did you hear that in Windows vista they implemented ASLR
, somethink
similar to the technology of random memory allocation in open
bsd. So I gues
Windows is copying bsd. Cool.
We'll see, like many other security features in Windows, if they implement
it
no way. trust me. ;)
We'll see, like many other security features in Windows, if they implement
it *properly*.
DS
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 12:58:43 -0700, akonsu wrote...
no way. trust me. ;)
Who the fuck are you to trust?
i am sorry you are on this list.
konstantin
2006/6/2, Eric Pancer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 12:58:43 -0700, akonsu wrote...
no way. trust me. ;)
Who the fuck are you to trust?
in my understanding a proper implementation does not require any service
packs. in other words: if one implements something that later requires a
service pack, this is not a proper implementation.
konstantin
2006/6/2, misiu [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
akonsu schrieb:
no way. trust me. ;)
-- Original message --
From: Eric Pancer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Who the fuck are you to trust?
you're just a warm and fuzzy kind of guy, aren't you?
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 20:48:06 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote...
you're just a warm and fuzzy kind of guy, aren't you?
Only on friday's.
this thread die a quiet death?
danno
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Eric Pancer
Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 4:18 PM
To: akonsu
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Windows to copy open bsd
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 12:58:43 -0700, akonsu wrote
akonsu wrote:
in my understanding a proper implementation does not require any service
packs. in other words: if one implements something that later requires a
service pack, this is not a proper implementation.
Exactly.
(And I don't seem to hear a lot about keeping OpenBSD patched
On 6/2/06, Dan Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip (including captain fucktrust) has
had any relevant input.
snip
Can't we all just get along ... and let this thread die a quiet death?
in a second don quixote.
1) were all subscribed to misc@ :: use the force :: resist the reply all button.
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 01:37:24PM -0700, akonsu wrote:
in my understanding a proper implementation does not require any service
packs. in other words: if one implements something that later requires a
service pack, this is not a proper implementation.
This is a nice idea, but everyone makes
Darrin Chandler wrote:
Ask Gates, Ballmer and crew what MS's goals are. Or find it on the MS
site. If none of that works you can speculate (I'm not going to). Do you
think their goals fall as much in line with what you want as does
OpenBSD's goals?
Actually, this is very easy and does not
13 matches
Mail list logo