should I just manually remove
/var/db/pkg/binpatch55* and /var/db/binpatch/*, or is there a better way to
handle this?
2) for the not-yet-upgraded system, should I remove the patches normally,
reverting to 5.5-RELEASE, or ... ?
Did you run openup after your upgrade? I think it cleaned up after
itse
5.6-upgraded system, should I just manually remove
> /var/db/pkg/binpatch55* and /var/db/binpatch/*, or is there a better way to
> handle this?
If you use openup, then you can just run it.
If not, then yes, you must manually remove these directories.
> 2) for the not-yet-upgraded system,
#x27;m thinking that if I uninstall the packages
normally, they'll revert certain system files to 5.5-RELEASE, which
would be undesirable.
So I now have two cases:
1) for a post-5.6-upgraded system, should I just manually remove
/var/db/pkg/binpatch55* and /var/db/binpatch/*, or is there a
Hello.
(my previous mail was lost by spamd?)
I'm using the openbsd binpatch framework (
http://openbsdbinpatch.sourceforge.net/ ).
And I'm using it and it is very nice. but, it is more usefull if there
is Makefile generator.
So, I made Makefile generator for the binpatch framework.
th
Hello,
My attachment was stripped out.
here is autogen.pl a Makefile generator for binpatch-1.1.0.
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
my $SITE="ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub";;
if(@ARGV==1){
$SITE=$ARGV[0];
}else{
printf("binpatch Makefile skelton(s) generator.\n");
printf("e
Hi, I'm new to this mailing list.
You know the openbsd binpatch framework (
http://openbsdbinpatch.sourceforge.net/ ).
And I'm using it and it is very nice. but, it is more usefull if there
is Makefile generator.
So, I made Makefile generator for the binpatch framework.
the att
If anybody is interested, a mailing list has been opened to follow the
discussion on and contributions to binpatch:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbsdbinpatch-misc
--
Gerardo Santana
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Tobias Weisserth wrote:
So if you use it, you will probably need to do maintenance work
yourself, first of all adapting it to OpenBSD 4.0.
Or you can make your own patches very easily too without any addons.
After patching your sources, you could:
# FAKEROOT=/usr/obj/patche
ve just downloaded it
> and the idea of making binary patches in order to easily copy them to
> other similar machines is excellent.
Indeed it is a simple and powerful idea, and the code is not too
difficult to understand. It worked for me when i used it.
Yet, be careful. Binpatch is *definit
Hi there,
On Saturday, 6. January 2007 17:24, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
...
> So if you use it, you will probably need to do maintenance work
> yourself, first of all adapting it to OpenBSD 4.0.
Have a look here:
http://erdelynet.com/binpatch/
Mike has a Makefile for 4.0 stable that I'
patches in order to easily copy them to
> other similar machines is excellent.
Indeed it is a simple and powerful idea, and the code is not too
difficult to understand. It worked for me when i used it.
Yet, be careful. Binpatch is *definitely* unsupported by the
OpenBSD project. The standard
No, I'm very familiar with BSDs and make some more other things... I was
just looking for someone to share his/hers experience about
binpatch with me. I was just afraid not to do some harm to my system
(which at this time has almost 90GB of stuff - ports, settings, packages,
sources, ba
Hi,
Gabriel George POPA wrote on Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 05:26:01PM +0200:
> 4) I've heard about binpatch and I've tried to use it once
> (I must apply some security/reliability patches here).
> For me it's impractical to recompile the entire system
You need not recomp
2005/8/16, Ingo Schwarze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Gerardo, hi Gaby,
>
> Gerardo Santana Gsmez Garrido wrote on Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 08:56:39AM -0500:
> > On 8/16/05, Gaby vanhegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> http://www.openbsd.org.mx/pub/binpatch/
It doesn't need to be updated, it still works great and will continue to
do as long as the way OBSD is patched doesn't change.
Gaby vanhegan wrote:
On 16 Aug 2005, at 14:04, Rico wrote:
tepatche is good.
It doesn't look like it's been updated since 2003. Are there any
more recent tools
Hi Gerardo, hi Gaby,
Gerardo Santana Gsmez Garrido wrote on Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 08:56:39AM -0500:
> On 8/16/05, Gaby vanhegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> http://www.openbsd.org.mx/pub/binpatch/
>> Has not built any patches for 3.7, despite there being 4 security
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
> Gaby vanhegan
> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 9:49 AM
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: binpatch
>
> On 16 Aug 2005, at 14:04, Rico wrote:
>
> > tepatche is goo
On 8/16/05, Gaby vanhegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know that I should really be applying my own source patches, but I
> find binpatch very useful. The usual site that I use:
>
> http://www.openbsd.org.mx/pub/binpatch/
>
> Has not built any
On 16 Aug 2005, at 14:04, Rico wrote:
> tepatche is good.
It doesn't look like it's been updated since 2003. Are there any
more recent tools? Does anyone else have any good/bad experiences
with tepatche?
Gaby
--
Junkets for bunterish lickspittles since 1998!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://weblo
Hi,
tepatche is good.
Rico.
Gaby vanhegan wrote:
Hi,
I know that I should really be applying my own source patches, but I
find binpatch very useful. The usual site that I use:
http://www.openbsd.org.mx/pub/binpatch/
Has not built any patches for 3.7, despite there being 4 security
Hi,
I know that I should really be applying my own source patches, but I
find binpatch very useful. The usual site that I use:
http://www.openbsd.org.mx/pub/binpatch/
Has not built any patches for 3.7, despite there being 4 security
advisories published about it. Are there any other
21 matches
Mail list logo
