On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 06:34:27PM +0200, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 08:52:48AM -0700, Mike Larkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 04:26:37PM +0200, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I was wondering if binutils-2.17 will be that version for the next
> > >
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 08:52:48AM -0700, Mike Larkin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 04:26:37PM +0200, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was wondering if binutils-2.17 will be that version for the next
> > foreseeable
> > future? Reason being is that there is backports to RISCV's
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 04:26:37PM +0200, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if binutils-2.17 will be that version for the next foreseeable
> future? Reason being is that there is backports to RISCV's binutils but they
> don't go that low to 2.17. Since I'm lazy, I don't really
Hi,
I was wondering if binutils-2.17 will be that version for the next foreseeable
future? Reason being is that there is backports to RISCV's binutils but they
don't go that low to 2.17. Since I'm lazy, I don't really want to port
binutils to 2.17 for any architecture if it's not already done
4 matches
Mail list logo
