* Sélène [2014-04-11 12:25]:
> Le 2014-04-09 00:48, czark...@gmail.com a écrit :
> >Remy said:
> >>here is a simple patch to replace /etc/crontab by /etc/cron.d/.
> >
> >FWIW why?
>
> I find it far easier to have multiples crontab files in /etc/cron.d/
i find /dev/var/local/etc.d/$hostname/etc/c
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:05, Sélène wrote:
> Le 2014-04-09 00:48, czark...@gmail.com a écrit :
>> Remy said:
>>> here is a simple patch to replace /etc/crontab by /etc/cron.d/.
>>
>> FWIW why?
>
> I find it far easier to have multiples crontab files in /etc/cron.d/
> than keeping a single cron
Le 2014-04-11 14:21, Tomas Bodzar a écrit :
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Sélène wrote:
Le 2014-04-09 00:48, czark...@gmail.com a écrit :
Remy said:
here is a simple patch to replace /etc/crontab by /etc/cron.d/.
FWIW why?
I find it far easier to have multiples crontab files
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Sélène wrote:
> Le 2014-04-09 00:48, czark...@gmail.com a écrit :
>
> Remy said:
>>
>>> here is a simple patch to replace /etc/crontab by /etc/cron.d/.
>>>
>>
>> FWIW why?
>>
>
> I find it far easier to have multiples crontab files in /etc/cron.d/ than
> keep
Le 2014-04-09 00:48, czark...@gmail.com a écrit :
Remy said:
here is a simple patch to replace /etc/crontab by /etc/cron.d/.
FWIW why?
I find it far easier to have multiples crontab files in /etc/cron.d/
than keeping a single crontab.
At works, we are heavily using crontabs, and when we u
wasn't the "registry database" a dead giveaway???
On 8 Apr 2014 at 17:22, Dag Richards wrote:
> all sarcasm on my part.
> hate the whole /etc/hourly /etc/daily /etc/whim-time cron crap
>
> was happy to see Theo's reaction. Was jerking the list's chain.
>
>
> sven falempin wrote:
> > Look what
all sarcasm on my part.
hate the whole /etc/hourly /etc/daily /etc/whim-time cron crap
was happy to see Theo's reaction. Was jerking the list's chain.
sven falempin wrote:
Look what linux are accepting now : stuff like systemd, how modern ! and so
nicely done !
Maybe having a .d looks .damne
Look what linux are accepting now : stuff like systemd, how modern ! and so
nicely done !
Maybe having a .d looks .damned cool but does it really solve something ?
New is not better, modern surely isn't.
If there is a way for OpenBSD to move to a cron.d it probably needs a nice
explanation :
-
Remy said:
> here is a simple patch to replace /etc/crontab by /etc/cron.d/.
FWIW why?
--
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
On 04/08/14 16:35, Remy wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> here is a simple patch to replace /etc/crontab by /etc/cron.d/.
> You need to manually mkdir /etc/cron.d.
>
um. eight days late. I look forward to your contribution next year, but
try to hit the right date next time.
Nick.
No Theo I don't think understand, if you accept the patch then you will
be more like Ubuntu and other MODERN operating systems.
Why put everything in a single easily readable file, when you can split
it up in to multiple directories.
Which reminds me when are you going to ditch /etc for a nic
In your dreams.
> here is a simple patch to replace /etc/crontab by /etc/cron.d/.
> You need to manually mkdir /etc/cron.d.
>
>
> --- pathnames_original.hMon Apr 7 22:31:53 2014
> +++ pathnames.h Tue Apr 8 16:12:30 2014
> @@ -92,8 +92,8 @@
> #define PIDFILE"cron.pid"
Hi guys,
here is a simple patch to replace /etc/crontab by /etc/cron.d/.
You need to manually mkdir /etc/cron.d.
--- pathnames_original.hMon Apr 7 22:31:53 2014
+++ pathnames.h Tue Apr 8 16:12:30 2014
@@ -92,8 +92,8 @@
#define PIDFILE"cron.pid"
#define _PATH_CRON_PID
13 matches
Mail list logo
