On 05/02/2010 02:17, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2010-02-04, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
On 4 February 2010 11:11, Marco Peereboom wrote:
Besides it doesn't have all the Henning love either...
blatant case of stockholm syndrome! ;)
huh? you're not forced, there are plenty of other choices.
yo
On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:17 +1100, "Rod Whitworth"
wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 22:55:37 -0500, Eric Furman wrote:
>
> >> try diffing Apache 1.3.29 and OpenBSD httpd sometime. there are
> >> rather a lot more changes than you might think.
> >>
> >
> >Ya, I know manpower and time, but why don't you
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 22:55:37 -0500, Eric Furman wrote:
>> try diffing Apache 1.3.29 and OpenBSD httpd sometime. there are
>> rather a lot more changes than you might think.
>>
>
>Ya, I know manpower and time, but why don't you guys rewrite
>Apache from scratch, like you did with IPF? It would sto
It is very easy to tell other what to do with their spare time isn't it?
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 10:55:37PM -0500, Eric Furman wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 02:17 +, "Stuart Henderson"
> wrote:
> > On 2010-02-04, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
> > > On 4 February 2010 11:11, Marco Peereboom wrote:
On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 02:17 +, "Stuart Henderson"
wrote:
> On 2010-02-04, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
> > On 4 February 2010 11:11, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> >> Besides it doesn't have all the Henning love either...
> >
> > blatant case of stockholm syndrome! ;)
>
> huh? you're not forced, there
On 2010-02-04, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
> On 4 February 2010 11:11, Marco Peereboom wrote:
>> Besides it doesn't have all the Henning love either...
>
> blatant case of stockholm syndrome! ;)
huh? you're not forced, there are plenty of other choices.
you might want something else for a *busy* se
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> I'll trust henning drunk over the apache foundation.
>
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 09:24:35PM +, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
>> On 4 February 2010 11:11, Marco Peereboom wrote:
>> > Besides it doesn't have all the Henning love either...
>>
>
I'll trust henning drunk over the apache foundation.
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 09:24:35PM +, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
> On 4 February 2010 11:11, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> > Besides it doesn't have all the Henning love either...
>
> blatant case of stockholm syndrome! ;)
>
>
> Sevan
On 4 February 2010 11:11, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> Besides it doesn't have all the Henning love either...
blatant case of stockholm syndrome! ;)
Sevan
The license for the new 1.3 stuff is also unacceptable (same as 2).
Besides it doesn't have all the Henning love either...
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 07:51:48AM -0300, Andr?s wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> > OpenBSD apache 1.3 != apache 1.3
> >
> > What is wrong w
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> OpenBSD apache 1.3 != apache 1.3
>
> What is wrong with apache in base?
>
> And if you don't like it what is wrong with apache 2 in ports?
>
> Or any other web server in ports for that matter.
>
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 07:21:03PM -0800, D
OpenBSD apache 1.3 != apache 1.3
What is wrong with apache in base?
And if you don't like it what is wrong with apache 2 in ports?
Or any other web server in ports for that matter.
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 07:21:03PM -0800, David wrote:
> Given the above, is openbsd going to stick with Apache 1.
Given the above, is openbsd going to stick with Apache 1.3?
13 matches
Mail list logo
