Re: ifconfig problem - Botched upgrade?

2007-08-06 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 04:16:05PM -0700, Greg Thomas wrote: On 8/4/07, L. V. Lammert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 10:40 PM 8/4/2007 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: # ifconfig add -A to show all aliases. Bingo - I must have missed that somehow!! Also note this from the

Re: ifconfig problem - Botched upgrade?

2007-08-06 Thread Greg Thomas
On 8/5/07, Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 04:16:05PM -0700, Greg Thomas wrote: On 8/4/07, L. V. Lammert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 10:40 PM 8/4/2007 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: # ifconfig add -A to show all aliases. Bingo - I must have

Re: ifconfig problem - Botched upgrade?

2007-08-06 Thread L. V. Lammert
At 09:19 AM 8/6/2007 -0700, Greg Thomas wrote: The reason for this is a different one. Interface routes are all added to the routing table. The /32 route for the alias is necessary because the real network is already in the table. Additionally it helps choosing the main interface address for

Re: ifconfig problem - Botched upgrade?

2007-08-06 Thread Marco S Hyman
Most definitely, -A is normally the only way to see alias info. Just wanted to let you know about the /32 mask for aliases. ???. Perhaps I missed some earlier context, but -A is not the only way to see alias info. $ ifconfig msk0 msk0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST

Re: ifconfig problem - Botched upgrade?

2007-08-05 Thread Greg Thomas
On 8/4/07, L. V. Lammert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 10:40 PM 8/4/2007 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: # ifconfig add -A to show all aliases. Bingo - I must have missed that somehow!! Also note this from the hostname.if man page: net alias 10.0.1.15 255.255.255.255 Not having the /32

ifconfig problem - Botched upgrade?

2007-08-04 Thread L. V. Lammert
In the process of upgrading a test machine from 3.9 - 4.0 - 4.1, something seems have to gotten farkled with ifconfig and/or network config. Can't find any clues in the upgrade docs. Is there something funky with 4.0 - 4.1? Could file permissions have gotten off-track somewhere? Symptoms;

Re: ifconfig problem - Botched upgrade?

2007-08-04 Thread L. V. Lammert
At 04:11 PM 8/4/2007 -0500, you wrote: In the process of upgrading a test machine from 3.9 - 4.0 - 4.1, something seems have to gotten farkled with ifconfig and/or network config. Can't find any clues in the upgrade docs. Is there something funky with 4.0 - 4.1? Could file permissions have

Re: ifconfig problem - Botched upgrade?

2007-08-04 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2007/08/04 16:11, L. V. Lammert wrote: (tried variations w/wo inet, subnet mask, no difference) # ifconfig fxp0 inet alias 206.197.251.240 255.255.255.0 (no errors returned) that's incorrect, see the ifconfig manual (format is not the same as hostname.if). # ifconfig add -A to show all

Re: ifconfig problem - Botched upgrade?

2007-08-04 Thread L. V. Lammert
At 10:40 PM 8/4/2007 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: # ifconfig add -A to show all aliases. Bingo - I must have missed that somehow!! Thanks!! Lee