On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 06:15:25PM -0700, patrick keshishian wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Nick Holland
n...@holland-consulting.net wrote:
Daniel Malament wrote:
On 10/22/2009 5:37 AM, William Boshuck wrote:
And here I thought I remembered the new installer being described as
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 5:13 AM, Kenneth R Westerback
kwesterb...@rogers.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 06:15:25PM -0700, patrick keshishian wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Nick Holland
n...@holland-consulting.net wrote:
Daniel Malament wrote:
On 10/22/2009 5:37 AM, William
There used to be a message before the install script wiped out
filesystems with newfs, listing the partitions and asking if you were
sure. Was this removed, or did I somehow miss something? And WHY???
Because it is the install script.
What did you think it was going to do.
It's
On 10/22/2009 2:41 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
There used to be a message before the install script wiped out
filesystems with newfs, listing the partitions and asking if you were
sure. Was this removed, or did I somehow miss something? And WHY???
Because it is the install script.
What did
On Oct 22 03:34:45, Daniel Malament wrote:
In fact, there was a particular reason for my question. I had the vague
impression, probably erroneous, I suppose, that it was possible to get
the old install script to only newfs those systems for which you
specified a mount point.
Which is
On 10/22/2009 4:31 AM, Jan Stary wrote:
On Oct 22 03:34:45, Daniel Malament wrote:
In fact, there was a particular reason for my question. I had the vague
impression, probably erroneous, I suppose, that it was possible to get
the old install script to only newfs those systems for which you
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 03:34:45AM -0400, Daniel Malament wrote:
On 10/22/2009 2:41 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
There used to be a message before the install script wiped out
filesystems with newfs, listing the partitions and asking if you were
sure. Was this removed, or did I somehow miss
On 10/22/2009 5:37 AM, William Boshuck wrote:
And here I thought I remembered the new installer being described as easier to
use.
It is. Were it not so quick it would be positively
boring. Just don't set mount points for the partitions
Perhaps I should clarify: IMO, not double-checking
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 03:34:45AM -0400, Daniel Malament wrote:
On 10/22/2009 2:41 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
There used to be a message before the install script wiped out
filesystems with newfs, listing the partitions and asking if you
were sure. Was this removed, or did I somehow miss
Daniel Malament wrote:
On 10/22/2009 5:37 AM, William Boshuck wrote:
And here I thought I remembered the new installer being described as easier
to use.
It is. Were it not so quick it would be positively
boring. Just don't set mount points for the partitions
Perhaps I should clarify:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Nick Holland
n...@holland-consulting.net wrote:
Daniel Malament wrote:
On 10/22/2009 5:37 AM, William Boshuck wrote:
And here I thought I remembered the new installer being described as
easier to use.
It is. Were it not so quick it would be positively
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Nick Holland
n...@holland-consulting.net wrote:
Daniel Malament wrote:
On 10/22/2009 5:37 AM, William Boshuck wrote:
And here I thought I remembered the new installer being described as
easier to use.
It is. Were it not so quick it would be positively
There used to be a message before the install script wiped out
filesystems with newfs, listing the partitions and asking if you were
sure. Was this removed, or did I somehow miss something? And WHY???
13 matches
Mail list logo
