On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 09:57:50PM +0200, Stefan Unterweger wrote:
> * Pascal Stumpf on Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 05:39:48PM +0200:
> > > Check your /var/log/lpd.errs.
>
> > Doesn't contain anything but "restarted" messages.
>
> > > Also, ktracing lpd with the the -i flag might give a clue to what th
* Pascal Stumpf on Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 05:39:48PM +0200:
> > Check your /var/log/lpd.errs.
> Doesn't contain anything but "restarted" messages.
> > Also, ktracing lpd with the the -i flag might give a clue to what the
> > lpd child is doing.
> Apparently, it segfaults:
> I remembered I had the
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 09:40:42AM -0400, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> The (existing) abuse of toprec is a bit kludgy but this should fix
> the problem for now.
yes it does, also tested termcap and termlib db creation. But you are
right, the code is a bit ugly,
-Otto
>
> - todd
>
> Index:
The (existing) abuse of toprec is a bit kludgy but this should fix
the problem for now.
- todd
Index: lib/libc/gen/getcap.c
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/openbsd/src/lib/libc/gen/getcap.c,v
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -u -r1.29 getcap.c
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 01:44:09PM +0200, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:37:29 +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:28:22AM +0200, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 10:24:05 +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 05:39:48P
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:37:29 +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:28:22AM +0200, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 10:24:05 +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 05:39:48PM +0200, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:25:06
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:28:22AM +0200, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 10:24:05 +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 05:39:48PM +0200, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:25:06 +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 04:03:57P
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 10:24:05 +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 05:39:48PM +0200, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:25:06 +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 04:03:57PM +0200, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have two printers on the lo
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 05:39:48PM +0200, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:25:06 +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 04:03:57PM +0200, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
> >
> > > I have two printers on the local network (laser and lexmark) and I want
> > > to use lpd(8) to pri
On 10/12/11 10:03 AM, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
I have two printers on the local network (laser and lexmark) and I want
to use lpd(8) to print on them. It seems to me that lpd is having some
sort of local problem (it does not even create lock and status files in
the spool directories, and both lpr and
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:25:06 +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 04:03:57PM +0200, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
>
> > I have two printers on the local network (laser and lexmark) and I want
> > to use lpd(8) to print on them. It seems to me that lpd is having some
> > sort of local probl
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 04:03:57PM +0200, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
> I have two printers on the local network (laser and lexmark) and I want
> to use lpd(8) to print on them. It seems to me that lpd is having some
> sort of local problem (it does not even create lock and status files in
> the spool di
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:03 AM, Pascal Stumpf
wrote:
> I have two printers on the local network (laser and lexmark) and I want
> to use lpd(8) to print on them. It seems to me that lpd is having some
> sort of local problem (it does not even create lock and status files in
> the spool directories
I have two printers on the local network (laser and lexmark) and I want
to use lpd(8) to print on them. It seems to me that lpd is having some
sort of local problem (it does not even create lock and status files in
the spool directories, and both lpr and lpq do not see the daemon). But
some info fi
On 2010-05-07, Chris Bennett wrote:
> On 05/07/10 16:59, Frank Bax wrote:
>> I've never printed from my OpenBSD desktop.
>> I've used lpd on Windows to print to HP printers with "HP JetDirect".
>>
>> I read the recent thread about lpd/postscript.
>>
>> Will I be able to use lpd to print to any "HP
Hi,
I have a HP 1515n, which is pretty similar.
You can print directly to it (over LAN) without apsfilter etc.
Simply add an entry in /etc/printcap like this:
(rm = your printer IP)
lp:\
:sd=/var/spool/output:\
:mx#0:\
:sh:\
:rm=192.168.0.100:\
:rp=lp:
Also enable lpd in /
On 2010-05-07, Chris Bennett wrote:
> On 05/07/10 16:59, Frank Bax wrote:
>> I've never printed from my OpenBSD desktop.
>> I've used lpd on Windows to print to HP printers with "HP JetDirect".
>>
>> I read the recent thread about lpd/postscript.
>>
>> Will I be able to use lpd to print to any "HP
On 05/07/10 16:59, Frank Bax wrote:
I've never printed from my OpenBSD desktop.
I've used lpd on Windows to print to HP printers with "HP JetDirect".
I read the recent thread about lpd/postscript.
Will I be able to use lpd to print to any "HP JetDirect" printer?
I'm looking at getting an HP 15
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Frank Bax wrote:
> I've never printed from my OpenBSD desktop.
> I've used lpd on Windows to print to HP printers with "HP JetDirect".
>
> I read the recent thread about lpd/postscript.
>
> Will I be able to use lpd to print to any "HP JetDirect" printer?
>
Yes, H
I've never printed from my OpenBSD desktop.
I've used lpd on Windows to print to HP printers with "HP JetDirect".
I read the recent thread about lpd/postscript.
Will I be able to use lpd to print to any "HP JetDirect" printer?
I'm looking at getting an HP 1518ni colour laser.
Does "HP postscri
20 matches
Mail list logo
