theo wrote:
> Nothing you are saying has any relevance to the use of OpenBSD.
As much as one might wish it were, OpenBSD is *not* an island: the
place of OpenBSD in the world *is* a relevant issue. Real life, y'know.
> The chatter is useless.
You just can't stand to see yourself being
"j3s" wrote:
> On 4/14/20 11:02 PM, zap wrote:
>> I'll be honest, i like libre software, but, libre software that is
>> insecure, aka redhat's bs, openssl, java, etc... is barely better than
>> proprietary software.
>
> this is crap.
That stuff sure shares a lot of traits w/ one's typical
Haai,
"zap" wrote:
>
> I think theo is about the same as Linus in how foul he can get...
As meobserved, Theo's agression is more of passive kind. Dunno if that's
an improvement...
> but on the other hand, he at least doesn't wreck his software with
> pointless things like redhat's crap,
Nothing you are saying has any relevance to the use of OpenBSD.
The chatter is useless.
Stop it.
zap wrote:
>
>
> I think theo is about the same as Linus in how foul he can get...
>
> but on the other hand, he at least doesn't wreck his software with
> pointless things like redhat's crap,
On 4/14/20 11:02 PM, zap wrote:
I'll be honest, i like libre software, but, libre software that is
insecure, aka redhat's bs, openssl, java, etc... is barely better than
proprietary software.
this is crap.
unix philosphy should have been kept in linux. Because it wasn't,
well... Linux and
I think theo is about the same as Linus in how foul he can get...
but on the other hand, he at least doesn't wreck his software with
pointless things like redhat's crap, systemd for example, he seems to
prefer the keep it simple stupid approach from what I have seen. I much
prefer security
theo wrote:
> What does this have to do with OpenBSD?
Alright, let's talk about leadership. Do you folks think Linus is a
better leader than Theo here?
There, OpenBSD angle restored.
(Yes, medoes wish that discussion about lunix et al. be toned down. Even
so, mealso wishes that the
7 matches
Mail list logo
