Re: softraid(4) in production environment
On Fri, 21.11.2008 at 13:05:16 +0100, Guido Tschakert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I suggest: use slurpd and make it redundant ;-) Or use syncrepl and make it redundant. Kind regards, --Toni++
softraid(4) in production environment
Hi all, As post subject says, it's a clear question ?Is it softraid(4) ready for a production system? I have to build a authentication (with OpenLDAP) system and I want to do it with OpenBSD; I absolutely tust on Marco's good job, but I must to know if softraid(4) is ready for a real and critical production system. I've used softraid(4) solution in the past without problems, but I think softraid(4) it's better designed and coded, so the logical way is trust on it. -- Thanks, Jordi Espasa Clofent
Re: softraid(4) in production environment
Sorry, I mean I've used raidframe in the past... -- Thanks, Jordi Espasa Clofent
Re: softraid(4) in production environment
Jordi Espasa Clofent schrieb: Hi all, As post subject says, it's a clear question ?Is it softraid(4) ready for a production system? I have to build a authentication (with OpenLDAP) system and I want to do it with OpenBSD; I absolutely tust on Marco's good job, but I must to know if softraid(4) is ready for a real and critical production system. I've used softraid(4) solution in the past without problems, but I think softraid(4) it's better designed and coded, so the logical way is trust on it. If it is that critical wouldn't it be better to have two simple ldap server and replicate with slurpd. You know: keep the systems simple. This remember me on the discussions on having raid in a firewall and the answer is ever use carp and make it redundant. So I suggest: use slurpd and make it redundant ;-) guido
softraid(4) in production environment
Hi all, As post subject says, it's a clear question ?Is it softraid(4) ready for a production system? I have to build a authentication (with OpenLDAP) system and I want to do it with OpenBSD; I absolutely tust on Marco's good job, but I must to know if softraid(4) is ready for a real and critical production system. I've used softraid(4) solution in the past without problems, but I think softraid(4) it's better designed and coded, so the logical way is trust on it. -- Thanks, Jordi Espasa Clofent
Re: softraid(4) in production environment
Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote: As post subject says, it's a clear question ?Is it softraid(4) ready for a production system? I can only provide anecdotal support. I've been using it since August in a proxy-cache for a classroom of 24 dual boot Kubuntu/OS X machines. Seems ok. /Lars