On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 10:40:53PM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> The improvement was committed more than a month before we
> discussed the point... Somewhat amazing, i must say...
> Apparently, reading source-changes@ is useful when trying
> to answer questions. :-/
Sorry for not warning you gu
Here is a late afterthought...
I wrote on Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 11:36:38PM +0200:
>> Karel Kulhavy wrote:
>>> I tried to mount a CD-ROM twice:
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ mount /dev/cd0c /mnt/cdrom
>>> mount_ffs: /dev/cd0c on /mnt/cdrom: \
>>> specified dev
;> mount_ffs: /dev/cd0c on /mnt/cdrom: \
>> specified device does not match mounted device
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ mount /dev/cd0c /mnt/cdrom
If i understand correctly, the second mount command succeeded.
>> In first time I got an error message which doesn't make se
Karel Kulhavy wrote:
I tried to mount a CD-ROM twice:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ mount /dev/cd0c /mnt/cdrom
mount_ffs: /dev/cd0c on /mnt/cdrom: specified device does not match mounted
device
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ mount /dev/cd0c /mnt/cdrom
In first time I got an error message which doesn't make
I tried to mount a CD-ROM twice:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ mount /dev/cd0c /mnt/cdrom
mount_ffs: /dev/cd0c on /mnt/cdrom: specified device does not match mounted
device
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ mount /dev/cd0c /mnt/cdrom
In first time I got an error message which doesn't make sense - there was
5 matches
Mail list logo