* Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org [2010-06-02 17:18]:
Where's the diffs?
exactly.
talk is cheap.
I do see some ways to make altq in OpenBSD better easier. pf would
still be the major entry point of course.
irix ramblings are completely useless and if they have any effect at
all they
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 03:37:35 +0300
irix i...@ukr.net wrote:
Hello Misc,
But at least you can say why?
Obvious: don't fix what's not broken.
no kidding. As we've told irix before, it will not happen.
--
With best regards,
Gregory Edigarov
Gregory Edigarov ha scritto:
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 03:37:35 +0300
irix i...@ukr.net wrote:
Hello Misc,
But at least you can say why?
Obvious: don't fix what's not broken.
Gregory, its an hard concept to get by most of the people :)
no kidding. As we've told irix before, it
2010/6/2 irix i...@ukr.net:
Hello Misc,
But at least you can say why?
no kidding. As we've told irix before, it will not happen.
--
Best regards,
irix mailto:i...@ukr.net
Because it makes my VoIP phones at home and a friends workplace go
from hit-and-miss to...
Hello Misc,
All of a sudden started talking about some fixes. Have I mentioned somewhere
that something needs to be corrected,
or that something is not working? I just said about remaking to simplify the
code.
Alternatives queue was initially conceived as framework in which you can with
All of a sudden started talking about some fixes. Have I mentioned
somewhere that something needs to be corrected,
or that something is not working? I just said about remaking to simplify
the code.
Alternatives queue was initially conceived as framework in which you can
with minimal
Hello Misc,
Ideally this control altq the similarity in the tc tool in Linux.
--
Best regards,
irix mailto:i...@ukr.net
Ideally this control altq the similarity in the tc tool in Linux.
It is not going to happen.
2010/6/2 irix i...@ukr.net
Hello Misc,
All of a sudden started talking about some fixes. Have I mentioned
somewhere that something needs to be corrected,
or that something is not working? I just said about remaking to simplify
the code.
You said: Or replace altq to something else, more
2010/6/2 Janne Johansson icepic...@gmail.com:
2010/6/2 irix i...@ukr.net
Hello Misc,
All of a sudden started talking about some fixes. Have I mentioned
somewhere that something needs to be corrected,
or that something is not working? I just said about remaking to simplify
the code.
irix wrote:
Hello Misc,
Ideally this control altq the similarity in the tc tool in Linux.
Who would want this? This was the main reason for me to switch my
routers to OpenBSD. (consistency, ease of configuring)
I didn't want to fiddle with iptables and tc, search in outdated
tc
Hello Misc,
Ideally this control altq the similarity in the tc tool in Linux.
Who would want this? This was the main reason for me to switch my
routers to OpenBSD. (consistency, ease of configuring)
I didn't want to fiddle with iptables and tc, search in outdated
tc documentations or
2010/6/3 irix i...@ukr.net:
Hello Misc,
Ideally this control altq the similarity in the tc tool in Linux.
--
Best regards,
irix mailto:i...@ukr.net
Nobody here is stopping you from using Linux.
On Wed, June 2, 2010 13:37, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Hello Misc,
Ideally this control altq the similarity in the tc tool in Linux.
Who would want this? This was the main reason for me to switch my
routers to OpenBSD. (consistency, ease of configuring)
I didn't want to fiddle with iptables
Hello Misc,
Are there any plans have changed in the system of traffic control?
For example removal of code altq from pf and make a separate management
interface traffic other than pf.
Or replace altq to something else, more fast,
simple and functional. Or revision of an existing traffic
fast,
simple and functional. Or revision of an existing traffic management
system.
I love ALTQ integration to PF, and IMHO, ALTQ works just fine. Do you have
any problem with altq?
HTH,
--
insandotpraja(at)gmaildotcom
. Or revision of an existing traffic management system.
obvious troll is obvious
traffic management system.
obvious troll is obvious
no kidding. As we've told irix before, it will not happen.
Ouch. I like IRIX. ex-SGI employee 43951. :)
---
James A. Peltier james_a_pelt...@yahoo.ca
- Original Message
From: Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
To: Jan Stary h...@stare.cz
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Tue, June 1, 2010 2:40:37 PM
Subject: Re: traffic management
Hello Misc,
But at least you can say why?
no kidding. As we've told irix before, it will not happen.
--
Best regards,
irix mailto:i...@ukr.net
Isn't the onus on the one asking for change to list why it should be
changed, and to contribute the code to show why your approach is
superior, since Theo has apparently told you before it ain't
happening?
On 6/1/10, irix i...@ukr.net wrote:
Hello Misc,
But at least you can say why?
no
Why?
(There, I said it.)
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of
irix
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 7:38 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: traffic management
Hello Misc,
But at least you can say why?
no kidding. As we've told
22 matches
Mail list logo
