Hi,
On Sat, 14.08.2010 at 23:49:49 -0700, Bryan Irvine wrote:
> understand. Also, the OP wanted something that he can run on OpenBSD
> and Zenoss runs on Linux.
hmmm from my perspective, Zenoss looks like an "ordinary" Zope
application, and should therefore run on OpenBSD as well.
Kind regard
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 12:01:27AM -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:07:53PM +0200, Jiri B. wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 18:05:51 -0400
> > Jason Dixon wrote:
> >
> > > http://omniti.com/video/noit-oscon-demo
> >
> > Sorry no flash :)
> >
> > Some screenshots should be su
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 06:05:51PM -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 01:11:41PM -0700, James Peltier wrote:
> >
> > Being as I have never used Reconnoiter or Circonus, would you care to
> > elaborate
> > as to where these products "suck less" then Nagios or other solutions? I
I like Zenoss, though the new interface is a little difficult to
understand. Also, the OP wanted something that he can run on OpenBSD
and Zenoss runs on Linux. I like splunk a lot as well. I use splunk
to send events to Zenoss.
-B
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 2:21 AM, Toni Mueller wrote:
> On Fr
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:07:53PM +0200, Jiri B. wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 18:05:51 -0400
> Jason Dixon wrote:
>
> > http://omniti.com/video/noit-oscon-demo
>
> Sorry no flash :)
>
> Some screenshots should be sufficient for this products, interesting is
> there are no screenshots except th
On 15 August 2010 01:06, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2010/08/14 23:59, Eugene Yunak wrote:
>> On 15 August 2010 00:16, Jiri B. wrote:
>> > On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 13:08:57 + (UTC)
>> > Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> >
>> >> I'm occasionally working on a port of icinga which looks quite
>> >> intere
Friends who are using splunk strictly as a logger liked it. We had
hell of a lot of pain implementing 4.0. They don't understand the
concept of dropping privs, so it has to run as root. My company does
not allow the non-os team to have root. So endless fucking around
with permissions and "hey u
On 15 August 2010 00:16, Jiri B. wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 13:08:57 + (UTC)
> Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
>> I'm occasionally working on a port of icinga which looks quite
>> interesting (forked from nagios a while ago, it's still compatible
>> but has diverged quite a bit now - many problem
On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 13:08:57 + (UTC)
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I'm occasionally working on a port of icinga which looks quite
> interesting (forked from nagios a while ago, it's still compatible
> but has diverged quite a bit now - many problems have been fixed
> and improvements made, in par
On 2010-08-14, Toni Mueller wrote:
> On Fri, 13.08.2010 at 14:36:21 +0100, Kevin Chadwick
> wrote:
>> What do people think of monit.
>
> Ok, I'll chime in: What do people think of Zenoss and splunk?
I haven't looked at splunk, but zenoss looks "fiddly" to install on OpenBSD,
they provide a mega
On Fri, 13.08.2010 at 14:36:21 +0100, Kevin Chadwick
wrote:
> What do people think of monit.
Ok, I'll chime in: What do people think of Zenoss and splunk?
I'm so far leaning twoards trying Zenoss, but it surely has a high
barrier-of-entry, and I'm only interested in splunk for comparison.
Kin
What do people think of monit.
Jiri B. wrote:
> Sorry no flash :)
Hello,
The follow was embedded on the page linked by jdixon, near the bottom
you'll find this:
http://s.omniti.net/video/noit-oscon-demo/flash/playlist.xml
The direct link is inside.
Without flash, manually forging for direct links is part of life..
-Bryan.
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 18:05:51 -0400
Jason Dixon wrote:
> http://omniti.com/video/noit-oscon-demo
Sorry no flash :)
Some screenshots should be sufficient for this products, interesting is
there are no screenshots except that architecture picture.
Does it have some event console? So an operator c
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 07:00:37PM +0200, Martin Schrvder wrote:
> 2010/8/10 Iqigo Ortiz de Urbina :
> > Mainstream open source monitoring is pretty much about munin, cacti,
> > nagios, zabbix. You can make any of these run on openbsd, AFAIK.
>
> A munin port would be highly appreciated. :-)
net/
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 01:11:41PM -0700, James Peltier wrote:
>
> Being as I have never used Reconnoiter or Circonus, would you care to
> elaborate
> as to where these products "suck less" then Nagios or other solutions? I am
> looking into replacing out very aged monitoring system now and Na
- Original Message
> From: Jason Dixon
> To: C. Bensend
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Sent: Tue, August 10, 2010 12:58:50 PM
> Subject: Re: which monitoring do you use (on OpenBSD)
>
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:41:26PM -0500, C. Bensend wrote:
> > > nagios
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:41:26PM -0500, C. Bensend wrote:
> > nagios is shit. misdesigned, horrible code, and someone who obviously
> > doesn't understand blocking semantics of sockets writing that part of
> > the code...
> >
> > that said, I use it, too. and as almost every other serious user wi
> nagios is shit. misdesigned, horrible code, and someone who obviously
> doesn't understand blocking semantics of sockets writing that part of
> the code...
>
> that said, I use it, too. and as almost every other serious user with
> at least a little bit of standards left I hate it.
I cannot spea
2010/8/10 Iqigo Ortiz de Urbina :
> Mainstream open source monitoring is pretty much about munin, cacti,
> nagios, zabbix. You can make any of these run on openbsd, AFAIK.
A munin port would be highly appreciated. :-)
Best
Martin
* Eugene Yunak [2010-08-10 15:05]:
> Definitely nagios/cacti pair or zabbix. Having used nagios for a year
> or so, i would never want to get back to Tivoli. It also gives you
> lots of flexibility in how you setup your monitoring, and can neatly
> work with snmp as well.
anyone using nagios and
Mainstream open source monitoring is pretty much about munin, cacti,
nagios, zabbix. You can make any of these run on openbsd, AFAIK.
Even though they serve different purposes, my favourite (if no custom,
tailored solution is crafted) between these is cacti.
However, its pretty disappointing the
On 10 August 2010 02:28, Jiri B. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm thinking to choose a monitoring tool which would run on OpenBSD
> of course.
>
> I have been working with Tivoli and Netview for couple of years so my
> idea is:
>
> * clients
>
> - heartbeats of course
> - simple interface to give a client
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 01:28:09 +0200
"Jiri B." wrote:
> I'm thinking to choose a monitoring tool which would run on OpenBSD
> of course.
*) Nagios to monitor for problems
*) Cacti for performance logs
Nfsen, smokeping and pfstat are also handy sometimes.
Don't expect exact Tivoli/Netview clones;
Hello,
I'm thinking to choose a monitoring tool which would run on OpenBSD
of course.
I have been working with Tivoli and Netview for couple of years so my
idea is:
* clients
- heartbeats of course
- simple interface to give a client some input as alert
- text configuration on client node (can
25 matches
Mail list logo
