Re: interested in LDAP ?

2014-05-19 Thread Stéphane Guedon
Le lundi 19 mai 2014, 11:51:15 Gilles Chehade a écrit : > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:39:17AM +0200, St?phane Guedon wrote: > > Le lundi 19 mai 2014, 11:31:52 Gilles Chehade a ?crit : > > > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:30:52AM +0200, St?phane Guedon wrote: > > > > Le lundi 19 mai 2014, 10:52:52 Gilles

Re: [OpenSMTPD] master snapshot opensmtpd-201405142324 available

2014-05-19 Thread Gilles Chehade
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 06:55:51PM +0100, John Cox wrote: > > > >can you reproduce the problem easily ? > > I believe so - seemed to happen every time for every message, on an > admittedly limited sample as I stopped trying to use it quite quickly > at that point... If you want some specific debu

Re: [OpenSMTPD] master snapshot opensmtpd-201405142324 available

2014-05-19 Thread John Cox
Hi >hi, > >can you reproduce the problem easily ? I believe so - seemed to happen every time for every message, on an admittedly limited sample as I stopped trying to use it quite quickly at that point... If you want some specific debug I'm happy to try again. Thanks JC >Gilles > > >On Thu, M

Re: understanding of accept rules

2014-05-19 Thread Norman Golisz
On Mon May 19 2014 14:40, K-Ray wrote: > On 16-05-14 22:36, Norman Golisz wrote: > >indeed, "alias" is not part of the matching process, it's actually > >processed after the mail has already been accepted. That's why you've > >got three rules all having the same matching criteria, from the matching

Re: understanding of accept rules

2014-05-19 Thread Norman Golisz
On Mon May 19 2014 14:40, K-Ray wrote: On 16-05-14 22:36, Norman Golisz wrote: >indeed, "alias" is not part of the matching process, it's actually >processed after the mail has already been accepted. That's why you've >got three rules all having the same matching criteria, from the matching >proc

Re: [OpenSMTPD] master snapshot opensmtpd-201405142324 available

2014-05-19 Thread Gilles Chehade
hi, can you reproduce the problem easily ? Gilles On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 09:21:04AM +0100, John Cox wrote: > Hi > > It almost works for me on OpenBSD5.5-stable. > > Compiles, runs, delivers and then dies > > Many thanks > > John Cox > > # smtpd -d -v > debug: init ssl-tree > info: loa

Re: understanding of accept rules

2014-05-19 Thread K-Ray
On 16-05-14 22:36, Norman Golisz wrote: indeed, "alias" is not part of the matching process, it's actually processed after the mail has already been accepted. That's why you've got three rules all having the same matching criteria, from the matching processors point of view. I think what you're

Re: interested in LDAP ?

2014-05-19 Thread Gilles Chehade
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:39:17AM +0200, St?phane Guedon wrote: > Le lundi 19 mai 2014, 11:31:52 Gilles Chehade a ?crit : > > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:30:52AM +0200, St?phane Guedon wrote: > > > Le lundi 19 mai 2014, 10:52:52 Gilles Chehade a ?crit : > > > > ohai, > > > > > > > > if you're inte

Re: interested in LDAP ?

2014-05-19 Thread Stéphane Guedon
Le lundi 19 mai 2014, 11:31:52 Gilles Chehade a écrit : > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:30:52AM +0200, St?phane Guedon wrote: > > Le lundi 19 mai 2014, 10:52:52 Gilles Chehade a ?crit : > > > ohai, > > > > > > if you're interested in getting LDAP fixed, I plan a debugging > > > session this Thusrday

Re: interested in LDAP ?

2014-05-19 Thread Gilles Chehade
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:30:52AM +0200, St?phane Guedon wrote: > Le lundi 19 mai 2014, 10:52:52 Gilles Chehade a ?crit : > > ohai, > > > > if you're interested in getting LDAP fixed, I plan a debugging > > session this Thusrday at 7PM (Europe/Paris) on IRC: #opensmtpd @ > > freenode > > > > im

Re: interested in LDAP ?

2014-05-19 Thread Stéphane Guedon
Le lundi 19 mai 2014, 10:52:52 Gilles Chehade a écrit : > ohai, > > if you're interested in getting LDAP fixed, I plan a debugging > session this Thusrday at 7PM (Europe/Paris) on IRC: #opensmtpd @ > freenode > > im willing to stay working on it as long as it takes for all crashes > to go, but gi

interested in LDAP ?

2014-05-19 Thread Gilles Chehade
ohai, if you're interested in getting LDAP fixed, I plan a debugging session this Thusrday at 7PM (Europe/Paris) on IRC: #opensmtpd @ freenode im willing to stay working on it as long as it takes for all crashes to go, but given that im not an LDAP user and not too familiar with it, I would love

Re: Requeue corrupt mail

2014-05-19 Thread Ole Jakobsen
> Did you stop smtpd before editing? I've had it that without stopping > smtpd would rewrite the envelope after I edited it. > I didn't try that bu tI will. Cheers > > How do I move the mail back in the queue? > > > > Cheers -- You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensm

Re: Requeue corrupt mail

2014-05-19 Thread Marcus MERIGHI
o...@scientia-it.net (Ole Jakobsen), 2014.05.19 (Mon) 09:23 (CEST): > Is it how do I requeue mails that is in corrupt queue? > I had 8 mails in a compressed queue, I then edited the .conf and > restarted smtpd. All mails in the queue then was moved to the corrupt > folde (as expected). > I have the

Requeue corrupt mail

2014-05-19 Thread Ole Jakobsen
Hi Is it how do I requeue mails that is in corrupt queue? I had 8 mails in a compressed queue, I then edited the .conf and restarted smtpd. All mails in the queue then was moved to the corrupt folde (as expected). I have then renamed an envelope from xxx to xxx.Z then decompressed it edited th