On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, Omar Polo wrote:
Sorry for the delay,
I was able to build the release 7.3 branch on NetBSD 9.3 with libressl 3.7.3
and with openssl 3.1.1. Both configurations appear to work !
Thank you for the fixes !
Andi..
On 2023/06/05 15:20:38 -0700, Andi Vajda wrote:
On
Sorry for the delay,
On 2023/06/05 15:20:38 -0700, Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> On Mon, 5 Jun 2023, Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> > The build succeeds but running a debug session:
> > sudo ./local/sbin/smtpd -f `pwd`/smtpd.conf -dv
> >
> > fails. I'm not sure how much of my debug logs is appropriate to post
On Sun, 4 Jun 2023, Omar Polo wrote:
> Haven't noticed that there isn't a way to force the usage of the
> bundled libasr. I've added the configure knob --with-bundled-libasr
> and included it in the release-7.3 branch (no new RC this time though)
I just tested my June 4 snapshot on a Slackware
On 2023/06/06 09:45:09 -0700, Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> On Tue, 6 Jun 2023, Omar Polo wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > thanks for testing!
> >
> > Regarding the build failure when using LibreSSL, I can reproduce on
> > OpenBSD: it's because the bundled libtls is meant to be used with
> > OpenSSL. I'll
On Tue, 6 Jun 2023, Omar Polo wrote:
Hello,
thanks for testing!
Regarding the build failure when using LibreSSL, I can reproduce on
OpenBSD: it's because the bundled libtls is meant to be used with
OpenSSL. I'll take a look at having it build with LibreSSL too but
that's more a
Hello,
thanks for testing!
Regarding the build failure when using LibreSSL, I can reproduce on
OpenBSD: it's because the bundled libtls is meant to be used with
OpenSSL. I'll take a look at having it build with LibreSSL too but
that's more a quality-check rather than a priority since LibreSSL
On Mon, 5 Jun 2023, Andi Vajda wrote:
The build succeeds but running a debug session:
sudo ./local/sbin/smtpd -f `pwd`/smtpd.conf -dv
fails. I'm not sure how much of my debug logs is appropriate to post here but
I could try to build with openssl 3 next ?
Same problem with smtpd built
Hi Omar,
Thank you for doing this !
More below...
On Wed, 31 May 2023, Omar Polo wrote:
It's been a while since the last OpenSMTPD-portable release, but here
we are. After syncing the portable repository with OpenBSD, plus
various miscellaneous portable tweaks, I've talked with Gilles and
Op 05-06-2023 om 12:52 schreef Omar Polo:
On 2023/06/04 11:40:34 +0200, Frank de Bruijn wrote:
I built 7.3.0p0 rc2 on Debian Bookworm and it seems to work ok so far.
Just one thing: I had to change my smtpd.conf, because starting
initially failed with:
smtpd: invalid listen option: pki
On 2023/06/04 11:40:34 +0200, Frank de Bruijn wrote:
> I built 7.3.0p0 rc2 on Debian Bookworm and it seems to work ok so far.
> Just one thing: I had to change my smtpd.conf, because starting
> initially failed with:
>
> smtpd: invalid listen option: pki required for tls/smtps
>
> My
On Sun, 4 Jun 2023, Omar Polo wrote:
> On 2023/06/03 09:08:05 -0700, Richard Narron wrote:
> > In order to use the bundled libasr, I had to uninstall my existing libasr
> > slackware build (port).
> >
> > It would be nice to have a --with-bundled-libasr option for the build.
> > Then It could
I built 7.3.0p0 rc2 on Debian Bookworm and it seems to work ok so far.
Just one thing: I had to change my smtpd.conf, because starting
initially failed with:
smtpd: invalid listen option: pki required for tls/smtps
My smtpd.conf has four pki sets, because the server serves several
domains.
On 2023/06/03 09:08:05 -0700, Richard Narron wrote:
> In order to use the bundled libasr, I had to uninstall my existing libasr
> slackware build (port).
>
> It would be nice to have a --with-bundled-libasr option for the build.
> Then It could ignore an existing installed libasr.
Haven't
On Sat, 3 Jun 2023, Omar Polo wrote:
> To stay on the safe side for this release I've re-added
> --with-path-CAfile. Please note that it only has effect when building
> the bundled libtls, as otherwise I don't have control over what
> tls_default_ca_cert_file() returns.
>
> It's in the
On 2023/06/02 07:05:10 -0700, Richard Narron wrote:
> [...]
> If more BSD/Linux/other systems need to hardcode the CAfile, then it might
> be useful to have the --with-path-CAfile
To stay on the safe side for this release I've re-added
--with-path-CAfile. Please note that it only has effect
On Fri, 2 Jun 2023, Omar Polo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks for testing!
Thanks for all the work of upgrading OpenSMTPD compatible again!
>
> On 2023/06/01 10:35:39 -0700, Richard Narron wrote:
> > On Thu, 1 Jun 2023, Richard Narron wrote:
> >
> > > I will modify the build to remove the
Hello,
Thanks for testing!
On 2023/06/01 10:35:39 -0700, Richard Narron wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Jun 2023, Richard Narron wrote:
>
> > I will modify the build to remove the --with-path-CAfile
> > configure option and add a symbolic link for /etc/ssl/cert.pem
>
> The symbolic link in my build is not
On Thu, 1 Jun 2023, Richard Narron wrote:
> I will modify the build to remove the --with-path-CAfile
> configure option and add a symbolic link for /etc/ssl/cert.pem
The symbolic link in my build is not good idea because
it erases the cert.pem file which may be in use by other applications.
I
awesome work from Omar Polo, thanks for everything
May 31, 2023 6:14 PM, "Omar Polo" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It's been a while since the last OpenSMTPD-portable release, but here
> we are. After syncing the portable repository with OpenBSD, plus
> various miscellaneous portable tweaks, I've talked
OpenSMTPD 7.3.0p0 rc1 builds okay on Slackware 15.0 (stable) but displays
this configure warning message:
configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-path-CAfile
Testing smtpd failed at first
The program started, but stopped immediately with an error message:
smtpd[10147]: info:
20 matches
Mail list logo