Re: pre-queue spam check

On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 04:10:22PM +0200, Joerg Jung wrote: The longer I think about it (while looking at the existing filter code), the more I come to the conclusion that I just should sit down tonight and write this missing SA filter. Based on the existing filters in -extras and the

Re: Slight correction on Does anyone else have an issue establishing a starttls to this host.

On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 13:27:48 -0700 Seth wrote: Do you have a test email address we can try sending something to which uses that server? Sent privately Also, whether this hangs /usr/bin/openssl s_client -connect mx5.demon.co.uk:25 -starttls smtp -CAfile /etc/ssl/cert.pem Starttls.info

Re: pre-queue spam check

On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 11:44:04AM +0200, Joerg Jung wrote: Hi, Hi, [...] I know about clamsmtp, spampd etc. which check/tag *after* queuing. But since I prefer not to annoy my users with quarantine (web-interfaces), ***SPAM*** subjects, spam folders, or similar things I want to ask: Is

pre-queue spam check

Hi, I'm in the middle of migrating a rather large existing openbsd setup with sendmail+milter, spamassassin, clamav, and dovecot as well as virtual users to a similar opensmtpd setup. Now I stuck a bit with the spam/virus checking. I know about clamsmtp, spampd etc. which check/tag *after*

Re: OpenSMTPd Headache

On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 07:38:51PM +0200, Antoine Michard wrote: Hi all, I'm Antoine, from France and I try to be good in sysadmin on Freebsd Since yesterday, I try to configure my fresh OpenSMTPd daemon :) New server, new configuration (lastest use Postfix + MySQL) First, OpenSMTPd

Re: OpenSMTPd Headache

For your information: # smtpd -vd debug: init ssl-tree info: OpenSMTPD 5.4.4p1 starting I will make a bug report on GitHub soon Thx for help 2015-04-08 10:12 GMT+02:00 Gilles Chehade gil...@poolp.org: On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 07:38:51PM +0200, Antoine Michard wrote: Hi all, I'm Antoine,

Slight correction on Does anyone else have an issue establishing a starttls to this host.

http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=142842356024311w=2 When I looked at the actual traffic it appeared that it gets one step further and the connection actually stops at OpenSMTPD sending a client hello via STARTTLS with no further response from the other side. If someone can say it happens to

Re: Slight correction on Does anyone else have an issue establishing a starttls to this host.

On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 12:16:49 -0700, Kevin Chadwick m8il1i...@gmail.com wrote: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=142842356024311w=2 When I looked at the actual traffic it appeared that it gets one step further and the connection actually stops at OpenSMTPD sending a client hello via STARTTLS