Re: need help to understand the logic of new grammar
I'll try to answer myself. As i see, the options "from local" and "for local" is the defaults, and can be omitted? So, the first match can be cut to match action "mbox" ?? the my first question i have understood, if "from local" is the default, than it will not work without "from any" the second question was about "from any" in the 4th match. I see, if i try to send email, i connect to egress, so this is not local, and will not work. also i cant use "from " and in trird match, mails from dkim proxy come to lo0, so they are processed as local and the rule can be extended to: match from local tag DKIM for any action "relay" am i right? so the last question, can i limit mta to inet4 only? ср, 31 окт. 2018 г. в 15:04, Илья Коскин : > Hello list! Please look at my match-action definitions: > > action "mbox" mbox alias > action "mda" mda "/usr/local/bin/procmail" alias > action "relay" relay > action "relay_dkim" relay host smtp://127.0.0.1:10027 > > match for local action "mbox" > match from any for domain action "mda"#2nd match > match tag DKIM for any action "relay" #3rd match > match auth from any for any action "relay_dkim" #4th match > > I have some questions about matches. > 1) If I remove "from any" in the second match, smtpd will not accept any > mail from internet. Why? > 2) In the 4th match, again, without "from any" I can't send mail to > anywhere. How can I know, where i need to use "from any" and where i don't? > For example 3rd match work without "from any" > 3) is this config comosed secure and correctly? > maybe it is option to use > match auth from for any action "relay_dkim" ? > if this work, it can partially help to prevent spamming from compromised > users. > > Also, is there any way to limit mta sending only from ipv4? > > Thank's! > >
Re: Question about backup mx
Ok, thanks for the clarification. I guess one way to avoid the wait is to just manually schedule all. On Wed, Oct 31, 2018, 8:48 AM Gilles Chehade On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 01:36:07PM -0400, Matt Schwartz wrote: > > If I have two mail exchange servers and the primary one goes down, do > > I then have to manually issue an smtpctl schedule all to resume > > delivery from the backup to the primary? > > > > no, you just have to way for the backup one to realize the primary is up > which may take some time depending how long the primary was down. > > > > -- > Gilles Chehade > > https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg >
Re: Question about backup mx
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 01:36:07PM -0400, Matt Schwartz wrote: > If I have two mail exchange servers and the primary one goes down, do > I then have to manually issue an smtpctl schedule all to resume > delivery from the backup to the primary? > no, you just have to way for the backup one to realize the primary is up which may take some time depending how long the primary was down. -- Gilles Chehade https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg -- You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
need help to understand the logic of new grammar
Hello list! Please look at my match-action definitions: action "mbox" mbox alias action "mda" mda "/usr/local/bin/procmail" alias action "relay" relay action "relay_dkim" relay host smtp://127.0.0.1:10027 match for local action "mbox" match from any for domain action "mda"#2nd match match tag DKIM for any action "relay" #3rd match match auth from any for any action "relay_dkim" #4th match I have some questions about matches. 1) If I remove "from any" in the second match, smtpd will not accept any mail from internet. Why? 2) In the 4th match, again, without "from any" I can't send mail to anywhere. How can I know, where i need to use "from any" and where i don't? For example 3rd match work without "from any" 3) is this config comosed secure and correctly? maybe it is option to use match auth from for any action "relay_dkim" ? if this work, it can partially help to prevent spamming from compromised users. Also, is there any way to limit mta sending only from ipv4? Thank's!
Re: 6.4 broke procmail .forward
Hi Gilles, On 10/28/18 6:52 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote: Please do yourselves a favor, ditch procmail in favor of fdm. I am not sure if fdm is an option. Looking at https://github.com/ft/fdm.git it seems that this code has been abandoned. Are there others? Regards Harri -- You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
