Le 8 nov. 2013 à 19:50, Gilles Chehade a écrit :
> We have taken a wrong path by trying to synchronize our releases with OpenBSD.
>
> This is why you guys are confused now, OpenBSD 5.4 was tagged a while ago and
> OpenSMTPD was tagged at the same time and so it ships with a version that is
>
We have taken a wrong path by trying to synchronize our releases with
OpenBSD.
This is why you guys are confused now, OpenBSD 5.4 was tagged a while ago
and OpenSMTPD was tagged at the same time and so it ships with a version
that is very close to 5.3.3 but which isn't really 5.3.3 nor what we wan
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 07:21:24PM +0100, ilyes aiouaz - gmail wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi everyone,
> I'm ilyes Aiouaz, technical and associate manager in a IT consultancy.
> I am interested by OpenSMTPD project and I'm starting to implement it
> on some platfo
Le 8 nov. 2013 à 19:21, Bryan Vyhmeister a écrit :
>
>> So since OpenBSD X.X is released, the only way to get new featured or
>> bug corrected OpenSMTPD is either use OpenBSD "HEAD" or OpenSMTPD
>> snapshots, right?
>
> That's correct. I ran into an obscure bug only triggered by spam-sending
>
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 07:07:06PM +0100, Joel Carnat wrote:
> But OpenBSD also has "OPENBSD_5_4_BASE" which is what I understood as
> "primary snapshot release for 5.4" and "OPENBSD_5_4" which I
> understand as "5.4 release plus required (security only ?) patches". I
> thought, maybe opensmtpd wou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everyone,
I'm ilyes Aiouaz, technical and associate manager in a IT consultancy.
I am interested by OpenSMTPD project and I'm starting to implement it
on some platforms.
I hope contribute to the project soon.
See you soon,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
OK.
But OpenBSD also has "OPENBSD_5_4_BASE" which is what I understood as "primary
snapshot release for 5.4" and "OPENBSD_5_4" which I understand as "5.4 release
plus required (security only ?) patches". I thought, maybe opensmtpd would also
be updated in "OPENBSD_5_4" and not only in "HEAD".
The version in archives is definitely newer. A release of OpenBSD is tagged and
the tree frozen for that release months back in order for CD duplication and so
forth. That's why archives has a much newer version. It is regularly synced to
-current as you noticed and I believe 5.4 has OpenSMTPD v
Hi,
I was looking at opensmtpd in brand new openbsd 5.4 and it seems not to be as
fresh as the one in /archives/.
I also had a look at the Web CVS of OpenBSD and, as far as I understood it,
opensmtpd seem to not be synced in the "release" tree but rather in the
"current" one.
Am I wrong or do
