ata
hook, it will be possible to simply have a filter skip a line if does
not want smtpd to write to the file.
Gilles
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this email because you are subscribed to mailing list:
misc@opensm
7;t write that bridge because I have no interest in it, but people
have voiced their interest in doing so.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this email because you are subscribed to mailing list:
misc@opensmtp
to maildir
accept from any virtual relay
have different semantic for
accept from any virtual
and it is precisely the "deliver|relay" part which removes the
ambiguity today.
There's a ticket to rework that, it's just not today's priority
--
Gilles Chehade
http
d;
> struct sockaddr_storage ss;
> in_port_tport;
> diff --git a/smtpd/ssl.c b/smtpd/ssl.c
> index 2f14157..4ae60d7 100644
> --- a/smtpd/ssl.c
> +++ b/smtpd/ssl.c
> @@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ ssl_ctx_create(void)
> }
>
> int
> -ssl_load_certfile(struct ssl **sp, const char *path, const char *name,
> uint8_t flags)
> +ssl_load_certfile(struct ssl **sp, const char *path, const char *name,
> uint16_t flags)
> {
> struct ssl *s;
> charpathname[PATH_MAX];
> diff --git a/smtpd/ssl.h b/smtpd/ssl.h
> index 640dc63..59e6951 100644
> --- a/smtpd/ssl.h
> +++ b/smtpd/ssl.h
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ struct ssl {
> off_tssl_key_len;
> char*ssl_dhparams;
> off_tssl_dhparams_len;
> - uint8_t flags;
> + uint16_t flags;
> };
>
> /* ssl.c */
> diff --git a/smtpd/to.c b/smtpd/to.c
> index 1c6219c..b703dee 100644
> --- a/smtpd/to.c
> +++ b/smtpd/to.c
> @@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ text_to_relayhost(struct relayhost *relay, const char *s)
> {
> static const struct schema {
> const char *name;
> - uint8_t flags;
> + uint16_t flags;
> } schemas [] = {
> { "smtp://",0 },
> { "lmtp://",F_LMTP },
> --
> 1.8.2.1
>
>
> --
> You received this email because you are subscribed to mailing list:
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, send mail with subject:
> [[email protected]] unregister
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this email because you are subscribed to mailing list:
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, send mail with subject:
[[email protected]] unregister
or other-writable, which should never happen). Make sure to
>
>chmod -t $HOME
>
If you can come up with a very simple diff, I have no objections to this
otherwise just add a feature request on github and I'll have a look when
I'm done with higher pri
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 02:53:23PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > I understand the task you're trying to accomplish but it seems like it's
> > something we want done through filters, not with new config ke
here's code that's been designed but not written yet;
> I think something like this is actually best controlled by a nob.
>
You must have a MUCH MORE convincing argument to introduce knobs ;-)
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 05:45:06PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > From within the filter API, you can have all the information mentionned
> > above if you want to... you can very well write a filter that will write
ll not tell how to enable it because by experience this means that
several people will just plug it and assume it to work, asking us tons
of questions about why this and that ;-)
For what it's worth, besides "externalized" scheduler, filters is the
next "big" thing we have i
rmissions of the offline message, I suspect it has a
> > chmod of 000 which is a bug I fixed in recent snapshots and in 5.3.2p1
> > about to be released.
>
> I just updated my opensmtpd, i don't succeed to reproduce the bug, so it
> seams to be solved ! :)
>
Yes, i
> radar? Anyone else seeing this?
>
> But I did remember this: [7] ;-)
>
> Bye, Marcus
>
Your issue should be fixed with 5.3.3, please confirm
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this email beca
es, but with the check you reversed your own listeners should no longer
do SSL correctly. With the check removed, it should work both ways. That
will be verified this morning and I'll commit the fix for next snapshot.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org
ssl->flags |= F_CCERT;
+ else {
+ if (! ssl_load_certfile(&ssl, "/etc/mail/certs",
+ r->r_value.relayhost.cert, F_CCERT))
+ errx(1, "cannot load certificate: %s",
+
e?
>
your issue should be fixed with next snapshot
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this email because you are subscribed to mailing list:
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, send mail with subject:
[[email protected]] unregister
he environment
> (frisell)?
>
yes, it should, this is a bug
if you can open a ticket on our bug tracker, I'll have a look at it
soon as i'm currently working on a bounce related ticket
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this email because you are subscribed to mailing list:
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, send mail with subject:
[[email protected]] unregister
3: warning: implicit declaration of function ?fatal?
> [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>
ah better! last time I couldn't see why you wanted to include log.h
but with the warning about fatal it makes sense.
it'll be fixed for next snapshot and release, thanks
--
Gilles
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 02:48:05PM -0700, James J. Lippard wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 11:10:28PM +0200, Kai Wirt wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 09:06:42AM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 08:42:26PM +, u-turn1 wrote:
> > > > C
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 08:53:33PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 06:53:59PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > The gentoo ebuild ships with this file:
> >
> > zx2c4@thinkpad ~/Projects/gentoo/gentoo-x86/mail-mta/opensmtpd/files $
> > cat bu
h easier. This implies that he had a
serie of changes to the script building the tarballs and the snapshots I
just published are the first we generate from that script.
Keeps us informed !
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You recei
27;
> dns.o(.text+0x3ad):/home/kusuriya/opensmtpd-201306071611/smtpd/../dns.c:144:
> undefined reference to `res_query_async'
> dns.o(.text+0x408):/home/kusuriya/opensmtpd-201306071611/smtpd/../dns.c:135:
> undefined reference to `getnameinfo_async'
> dns.o(.text+0x6f1): I
We have fixed a SSL-related timeout issue which looks very similar to
what you're experiencing.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this email because you are subscribed to mailing list:
[email protected]
To unsu
fa_filter_event(uint64_t, int);
> void mfa_filter_data(uint64_t, const char *);
> +void mfa_filter_prepare(void);
>
> /* mproc.c */
> int mproc_fork(struct mproc *, const char*, const char *);
fixed
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org
cent snapshots because it provides
different semantic on different systems.
Until we implement a portable "interface group"-like interface, the
correct way to listen on all addresses is to:
listen on 0.0.0.0
see discussion in:
https://github.com/poolpOrg/OpenSMTPD/issues/222
--
Gi
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 09:36:53PM -0300, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
> On 2013-06-07 16:45, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > OHAI,
> >
> > Just so you guys now, we would very much appreciate if you could test if
> > the snapshots work ok for you. If you track s
t;, SMTPD_NAME, SMTPD_VERSION);
>
>
> It should just be
>
> #define SMTPD_VERSION"201306071637p1"
>
Eric needs to have a look at this as it may impact the releng branch
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOr
om ?
Can you explain what use-case you're trying to solve ?
We're probably too conservative with mda errors but I would rather see
tempfail/permfail solved by sysexits(3) than by substring of the error
message :-/
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org
d yet?
>
Actually, it's more of a "we don't see a use-case for that feature" than
a "we don't support it yet" :-)
What are you trying to do that requires a pid file ?
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @pool
he
smtpd socket.
> P.S. I've been using opensmtpd for a week and am really impressed with its
> small memory footprint and performance.
> Keep up the good work!
>
Thanks ;-)
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
5 machine.
>
This has been fixed 4 days ago and will be part of next snapshot.
https://github.com/poolpOrg/OpenSMTPD/issues/239
Long story short, Linux does not have setproctitle() and our glue wasn't
doing things right. You can get the longer story from Eric who spen
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 06:32:26PM +0600, Denis Fateyev wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 06:08:15PM +0600, Denis Fateyev wrote:
> >
> > > That would be good to have a smtpd command line option whic
a few minutes to be related to yours, ok ? ;-)
> Now, I'm preparing RPM for RHEL-based systems because the existing ones
> available in the Internet aren't good at all. The spec and packages will be
> available soon.
> They'll be also available in Repoforge (DAG's repository) shortly, since
> I'm an official commiter there.
>
awesome !
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this email because you are subscribed to mailing list:
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, send mail with subject:
[[email protected]] unregister
mtpd.org/portable.html page is wrong.
> It points out to "opensmtpd-201305241932p1.tar.gz" which is not the last
> version.
>
> ---
> wbr, Denis.
>
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 06:32:26PM +0600,
s rule, the contract is clear for us all :-)
Feel free to ask any question in this thread !
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this email because you are subscribed to mailing list:
misc@open
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 06:07:13PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >
> > listen on 0.0.0.0
>
>
> This won't handle v6.
v6 uses a different notation:
$ sudo grep listen /etc/mail/smtpd.conf
listen o
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 06:10:13PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
> >
> > We're probably too conservative with mda errors but I would rather see
> > tempfail/permfail solved by sysexits(3) than by subst
7;t leave it in any
kind of weird state. Alternatively, you can use "smtpctl stop" which ...
will tell the parent process to raise a signal ;-)
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this email because you are subscribe
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 06:13:43PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > v6 uses a different notation:
>
> Right, so I have to duplicate my "listen on" lines to listen on "all" now?
Yup, at least until
n-dir}/makemap.
>
> What is the reason to keep two version of the same utility in the system?
>
I have not spent enough time in the portable layer to know that.
As of today, only Charles Longeau can answer that question :-)
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org
ch a message has
entered the system, individual recipients are logged "delivery" and
"relay" log levels.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this email because you are subscribed to mailing list:
misc@
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:35:37PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote:=
> > I don't quite get that.
> > At the MDA level, you're already far beyond the ruleset matching.
>
> I'd like to reject mail sent to
fix that should be made upstream
I'll wait a few hours to see if Charles is around and can tell me why we
needed the hardlinks, then I'll clean that up
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this email because you are
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 01:59:56PM +0200, MERIGHI Marcus wrote:
> [email protected] (Gilles Chehade), 2013.06.11 (Tue) 23:04 (CEST):
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:35:37PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote:=
> > &g
src/usr.sbin/smtpd/aliases.5 doesn't have that error thingy
> (yet), I suppose that's a very recent change (currently running cvs
> update to check).
>
Yes, our main repository is not the OpenBSD tree but a private git which
we regularly synchronize on github and OpenBSD.
You ca
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 04:21:38AM +0600, Denis Fateyev wrote:
> Hello Gilles,
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
> > This is typically the kind of fix that should be made upstream
> >
> > I'll wait a few hours to see if Charl
ternal MDA might be more suited to my needs...
>
Could be, but using virtual and userbase some very tricky virtual setups
can be achieved. Maybe you should explain your use-case in details :-)
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You rece
f you want to accept mail for an entire domain and your MDA takes
care of checking which ones are valid or not, then you can use the
wildcard notation to avoid providing a full mapping:
table vmap { "@example.org" = vmail }
# smtpd accepts [email protected] and uses the "
just the most popular :-)
A generic solution like the "--with-libexec" would for example make the
situation better for your system and others without mailwrappers, while
still providing the libexec/ indirection for systems that use them.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this email because you are subscribed to mailing list:
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, send mail with subject:
[[email protected]] unregister
need to rely on some
external utility that can talk SMTP so that your OpenSMTPD relay to it
and the tool relays back.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this email because you are subscribed to mailing list:
mis
it got installed, and they
didn't want it.
maybe we should just add a --with-regress in the configure script ?
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this email because you are subscribed to mailing list:
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, send mail with subject:
[[email protected]] unregister
me to deal with it (yeah i know it's bad...)
At a hackathon, we discussed a particular ipv6-unrelated issue when some
host as multiple routes and we came up with this solution which Eric has
implemented. The fact that it works fine with dual-stack hosts is really
a side-effect of our solution m
er topic: about recent changes on
> https://github.com/poolpOrg/OpenSMTPD/issues/252 issue.
> Will those changes take place only with verbose logging as we have
> discussed before? Or, now it's default behavior with standard logging? It's
> a bit unclear since I haven
> PS: Process name in log seems corrupted. Is there a bad pointer
> calculation somewhere?
>
Yes, this long-standing issue was fixed about 20 days ago:
https://github.com/poolpOrg/OpenSMTPD/issues/239
Both fixes are part of latest snapshot and will be part of next release.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 03:34:01PM +0200, [email protected] wrote:
> User eric has just rebuilt a portable snapshot, available from:
>
> http://www.OpenSMTPD.org/archives/opensmtpd-201306271531p1.tar.gz
>
> [...]
>
>* Tarball checksum in annoucement!
>
yay
nite size in email addresses...
> Please note that I'm not complaining about this issue; I'm just asking
> what's wrong with this address and what RFC I should read (so yes,
> it *is* slighlty OT).
>
Nope, perfectly on topic ;-)
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.pool
them. Lots of those emails clearly
> don't make it through.
>
Sometimes the RFC gives too much space for interpretation.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this email because you are subscribed to mailing list:
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, send mail with subject:
[[email protected]] unregister
il/ldapd.conf
> It seems to work ; at least to connect. But if I try using "ldaps", I get:
> smtpd: table_create: backend "ldaps" does not exist
>
Yes, backend != protocol ;-)
Both ldap and ldaps would be handled by the ldap backend, however... The
ldap ba
-text LDAP
> protocol ?
>
it is only useful when the ldap server is local so far
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this email because you are subscribed to mailing list:
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, send ma
to work on that code that
I don't use, unless ...
1- work makes it a top priority;
2- a sudden rise of user requests makes it a top priority;
3- someone/somecompany sponsors work in that area;
4- someone comes up with the code and we only have to review/test ;-)
Other than these, we are
smtp-in: Failed command on session 0001573f798d: "RCPT TO:
> " => 550 Invalid recipient
> smtp-in: Closing session 0001573f798d
> debug: smtp: 0x7d217000: deleting session: done
>
> The error is that my alias_filter looks badly formed.
> What would
table passwd:/etc/mail/mypasswdfile
Of course, you can use different passwd files for authentication and for
local users.
I encourage you to test and report issues as I suspect it will be used a
lot given how many times it was requested ;-)
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.pool
ntent inspection and to deal with
spam one has to use external tools.
there is a filtering API in progress that will allow writing filters run
by the smtp server itself, but it's not ready.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
the experimental features (atm. MySQL, Postgres, SQLite
> table backends), which aren't in stable port (mail/opensmtpd), which uses
> released versions.
>
great :-)
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this ema
goes fine. This time, I tried with "--with-mantype=man", and it
> > fails during "make install" stage:
I'll check with eric, the only thing that has changed with regard to
portable since the previous snapshot was the releng script. Maybe it
stripped something
to also have an AV since grey listing isn't really effective at
> stopping virii.
>
> On 2013-07-01 09:51, Rob Sciuk wrote:
> >On Mon, 1 Jul 2013, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >
> >it delivers it correctly ;)
> >
> >
> >Is there a pointer as to how to
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 12:51:59PM -0400, Rob Sciuk wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2013, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >
> >it delivers it correctly ;)
> >
>
> Is there a pointer as to how to set up pf/spamd with opensmtpd in
> order to effect an effective spam trap? I'd pr
Hi,
No access to a Linux build machine and I think the code needs a one-line
fix to build so the portable snapshot will be published slightly later.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this email because you are
actually it is supported, but there seems to be a problem with the use of
quotes, try:
rt: |/opt/rt3/bin/rt-mailgate --queue general --action
correspond --url http://rt.foo.local/
(it's still a bug, it should work with the quotes, a ticket is opened on
our bug tracker)
2013/7/6 Darre
way
at some point it did but there was a huge rewrite of the aliases parsing
code and a regression was introduced, we need to fix it
> Thanks -
>
> DS
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Gilles Chehade
> wrote:
>
> > actually it is supported, but there s
g to the docs should be
> used as the local hostname for checking if a mail is local. What's strange
> here is that the not fully qualified hostname "t23" is determined as local
> if found in the recipient but it is NOT determined as local if found in
> the sender, which
s hostname_without_domain to what
> +* its name says
> + */
> + table_add(t, hostname_without_domain, NULL);
> +
> table_create("getpwnam", "", NULL, NULL);
>
> /*
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.
We definitely need to test ECDH support with checking `OPENSSL_NO_ECDH`
> presence in sources, or trigger using EC features with a `configure` script
> switch.
>
We'll wrap the ecdh stuff in a OPENSSL_NO_ECDH test
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org
group feature to filter on this
port if the listening daemon doesn't run under _amavisd.
Unless you *really* trust your users, you shouldn't create them accounts
on the same machine where you run your mail server. Even more if there's
the slighte
for ;
Fri, 12 Jul 2013 08:37:50 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 08:37:50 +0200
From: Gilles Chehade
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; OpenBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130628
Thunderbird/17.0.7
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org
+ table_add(t, hostname_copy, NULL);
+
table_create("getpwnam", "", NULL, NULL);
/*
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this email because you are subscribed to mailing list:
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, send mail with subject:
[[email protected]] unregister
this is just a test please diregard
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this email because you are subscribed to the "[email protected]"
list
To unsubscribe, send mail with subject: [[email protected]] unregister
hanks ! :-)
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this email because you are subscribed to the "[email protected]"
list
To unsubscribe, send mail with subject: [[email protected]] unregister
osts seem to be using TLS, and, from the looks of
> the logs, my local smtpd isn't trying to use STARTTLS at any given moment.
>
> Is this a bug? Shouldn't smtpd always try to use TLS on outgoing email?
>
Logs needed
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 10:17:08AM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 05:30:55PM +0200, Stephan Schulz wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 09:54:53PM +0200, Stephan Schulz wrote:
> > >> Any thoughts?
> > >>
> > >
> > > yes.
updated my instances and you're right, we have introduced a regression at
some point
it'll be fixed in next snapshot
Gilles
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 04:49:23AM -0300, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
> On 2013-07-13 23:57, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 02:
cool, merged and pushed to github, will be part of next snapshost
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this email because you are subscribed to the "[email protected]"
list
To unsubscribe, send mail with subject: [[email protected]] unregister
ne. Although I haven't tested
> outgoing TLS connections yet, but I doubt they would fail.
>
I'm ok with that, what I'm not happy with is adding ifdef's to the code
when not absolutely necessary :-)
> 3) RES_USE_EDNS0 and RES_USE_DNSSEC options are missed in old GLIBC. Th
y question in this thread ;-)
PS: TEST please !
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this email because you are subscribed to the "[email protected]"
list
To unsubscribe, send mail with subject: [[email protected]] unregister
is not used in the source anymore.
>
Nope, the _smtpf user is no longer needed.
The issue which we solved using that user has been solved in a different
way allowing us to get rid of it. README.md will be updated shortly.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org
age, but
I would be very happy to learn that there is ;-)
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this email because you are subscribed to the "[email protected]"
list
To unsubscribe, send mail with subject: [[email protected]] unregister
something like this..)
> 4) "--with-privsep-user, --with-queue-user" (introduced into README with
> the latest commit), better if they separated with "and";
> 5) "First, kill any running sendmail/exim/qmail/postfix or other." ->
> "First,
t smtp even though the remote host
> supports STARTTLS.
>
Hi, there's no way to tell it to use TLS when relaying because it should
use it whenever it's available.
It currently does not because some of the recent reworks in MTA seems to
have introduced a regression.
It'
return 0;
/* no schema, default to smtp+tls:// */
- i = 1;
+ i = 2;
p = buffer;
}
else
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this email be
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 03:43:27PM +0300, Ossi Salmi wrote:
> Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >
> > Can you apply the following and confirm that it fixes your issue ?
>
> Yes it does. With STARTTLS enabled on the remote host TLS is now used:
>
Thanks !
Too bad we didn't g
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 07:51:44PM +0600, Denis Fateyev wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 03:43:27PM +0300, Ossi Salmi wrote:
> > > Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Can you apply the f
e makemap of
another MTA.
If you have questions, feel free to ask ;-)
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this email because you are subscribed to the "[email protected]"
list
To unsubscribe, send mail with subject: [[email protected]] unregister
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 01:36:30AM +0600, Denis Fateyev wrote:
> Hello Gilles,
>
> Answered with two tiny issues on Github ;-)
>
One is fixed, the other needs discussion because I don't think it really
is an issue ;-)
--
Gilles Chehade
http
Hi,
This is just a propaganda mail to share with you the news that a major
education group in France (where I studied !!!) has deployed OpenSMTPD
as their MX with the Internet.
Thanks to the postmasters @ ionis for their trust, we are very
excited about this ;-)
--
Gilles Chehade
https
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 07:40:49PM +0600, Denis Fateyev wrote:
> Congrats! Among the popularity, it brings more tests in production
> environment, testers and people involved overall.
>
Yes and what really makes me happy is that their configuration file is
below 10 lines ;-)
--
Gille
as a bug which was fixed some time after 5.3 release.
By installing OpenSMTPD 5.3.3, our latest stable version, you should not
be experiencing this bug anymore.
G'nite,
Gilles
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this email b
d it a lot with http a while ago
but I wasn't even aware you could use it in front of pop3.
I don't see why there would be any drawback but what pop3d are you using
that doesn't support SSL by default ?
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org
making that a
> configured item that you could configure exceptions to?
>
> Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 05:45:52PM +, Craig Jones wrote:
> >> Hello!
> >>
> >
> >Hey,
> >
> >
> >> I have slowly been migr
will opensource when the brick it was built on
is ready and opensourced.
It still has minor bugs which I'm too busy to debug at the moment, but I
will eventually find the time to do it ;-)
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You re
ced "subscribe" with
"register" since it seems most people can't spell it right ;-)
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this email because you are subscribed to the "[email protected]"
list
To unsubscribe, send mail with subject: [[email protected]] unregister
ou can either fix bugs and feature requests from our tracker:
https://github.com/poolpOrg/OpenSMTPD/issues
or improve parts that you think should be improved, then submit diffs or
pull requests for us to merge in the official tree.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poo
no worries, just wanted to make it clear for future references ;-)
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 01:10:05PM +0300, islam yasar wrote:
> Sorry my purpose was not advertisement??
>
>
> Sent from Samsung Mobile
>
> Original message ----
> From: Gilles Chehade
&
1 - 100 of 1023 matches
Mail list logo
