Re: using '[al]pine' with OpenSMTP

2017-01-05 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 02:35:46PM +1100, Damian McGuckin wrote: > > Does the FAQ need a section of tweaks for email clients? > > I tried to use 'alpine' on OpenBSD 6.0 with the standard SMTPD therein. > > A pkg_add'ed 'alpine' just sits there trying and trying until you go into > >

Re: Building on SmartOS/illumos

2014-06-21 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 09:56:40PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote: None I can probably help with that if needed. -- Antoine -- You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org

Re: Useless and unprofessional process names.

2014-05-09 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 10:58:00PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: I understand that there's recently been some process unification, and this rearchitecting has a few benefits. Cool. However, the new names of pony express and klondike are entirely useless to me, the admin, and

Re: Useless and unprofessional process names.

2014-05-09 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
However, the new names of pony express and klondike are entirely useless to me, the admin, and extremely unprofessional. Would you consider choosing more relevant process titles? If you consider pony express unprofessional, I advise you to look at your History books. Oh and

Re: [README] the latest snapshot

2013-09-09 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 12:10:16PM -0600, Gilles Chehade wrote: PLEASE TEEEST THIS SNAPSHOT ! PLEASE TEEEST THIS SNAPSHOT ! PLEASE TEEEST THIS SNAPSHOT ! PLEASE TEEEST THIS SNAPSHOT ! PLEASE TEEEST THIS SNAPSHOT ! PLEASE TEEEST THIS SNAPSHOT ! PLEASE TEEEST THIS