Hi Craig
Thank you very much for your input
For the archives, we are currently looking at Postfix - even though we would
very much prefer to stay on OpenSMTPD.
> Den 24. feb. 2020 kl. 14.47 skrev Craig Skinner :
>
> On Sat, 22 Feb 2020 21:25:11 +0100 Søren Aurehøj wrote:
>> ... sending with
LS required
but not supported by remote host” in the maillog.
My mailserver recognizes when it is unable to continue the
delivery due to a configuration setting on my mailserver.
But instead of bouncing the mail immediately, it is queued anyway for
later delivery.
Is it possible to enforce outgoing mai
;>> This gives the expected result - "mta event=error reason=TLS required but
>>> not supported by remote host” in the maillog.
>>>
>>> My mailserver recognizes when it is unable to continue the delivery due to
>>> a configuration sett
lnesia.com/>.
>>> This gives the expected result - "mta event=error reason=TLS
>>> required but not supported by remote host” in the maillog.
>>>
>>> My mailserver recognizes when it is unable to continue the
>>> delivery due to a configuration se
t; My mailserver recognizes when it is unable to continue the delivery due to a
>> configuration setting on my mailserver.
>> But instead of bouncing the mail immediately, it is queued anyway for later
>> delivery.
>>
>> Is it possible to enforce outgoing mail to a
tting on my mailserver.
> But instead of bouncing the mail immediately, it is queued anyway for
> later delivery.
>
> Is it possible to enforce outgoing mail to always use TLS - and bounce
> more or less immediately,
> if the sending mailserver registers that the receiving mailserver is
the maillog.
My mailserver recognizes when it is unable to continue the delivery due to a
configuration setting on my mailserver.
But instead of bouncing the mail immediately, it is queued anyway for later
delivery.
Is it possible to enforce outgoing mail to always use TLS - and bounce mo
