...on Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 03:33:53AM +0100, Martin Schr?der wrote:
On 2006-03-02 19:01:13 -0600, eric wrote:
Best you'll find for reliable traffic accounting (and the most flexible) is
argus http://www.qosient.com/argus/. I'd recommend that route, then using
Seems to be quiet since
On Thursday 02 March 2006 09:03, you wrote:
Really? So when the box goes down, just let the mail bounce?
Mail will not start to bounce the moment your box goes down. SMTP was designed
to be reliable.
How would it break spamassassin (which is what I use)?
It doesn't.
---
Lars Hansson
hi bsd-gurus ...
we are currently trying to set up an openbsd host, and have a problem
with source-routing mechanisms !?
Setup is as following:
(all IP4s examples)
hme1 - 10.50.0.10
hme0 - 217.5.23.69
hme0_alias - 217.5.23.70
default-gw is 10.50.0.1
If you want to connect to e.g.
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 01:08:43PM +0100, oliver simon wrote:
hi bsd-gurus ...
we are currently trying to set up an openbsd host, and have a problem
with source-routing mechanisms !?
Setup is as following:
(all IP4s examples)
hme1 - 10.50.0.10
hme0 - 217.5.23.69
hme0_alias -
On 2006/03/03 13:08, oliver simon wrote:
we are currently trying to set up an openbsd host, and have a problem
with source-routing mechanisms !?
PF route-to/reply-to options will ensure the packets are sent out the
correct interface, then you can either setup your software to bind to
the right
Ted Unangst wrote:
you can use whatever libraries you like. what's the point of a more
free distro when the only use for emulation is to run non-free
software?
or non-portable software like OpenOffice
reyk
by the way,what is the status of the openoffice native port?
On 3/3/06, Reyk Floeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ted Unangst wrote:
you can use whatever libraries you like. what's the point of a more
free distro when the only use for emulation is to run non-free
software?
or non-portable
Hi,
...on Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 01:08:43PM +0100, oliver simon wrote:
hme1 - 10.50.0.10
hme0 - 217.5.23.69
hme0_alias - 217.5.23.70
default-gw is 10.50.0.1
If you want to connect to e.g. 193.44.25.2, the machine has to go there
with one of it4s official IPs 217...
Are you shure
Hi Joachim, thanks for helping ...
here4s the requested ...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ # route -n show
Routing tables
Internet:
DestinationGatewayFlagsRefs UseMtu
Interface
default10.50.0.1 UGS 0 2796 - hme1
10.32.0/24
Hi Alex,
Alexander Bochmann wrote:
Hi,
...on Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 01:08:43PM +0100, oliver simon wrote:
hme1 - 10.50.0.10
hme0 - 217.5.23.69
hme0_alias - 217.5.23.70
default-gw is 10.50.0.1
If you want to connect to e.g. 193.44.25.2, the machine has to go there
with one of
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 11:32:58AM +0100, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
| Hello!
|
| On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 09:54:35AM +0100, Ramiro Aceves wrote:
| Just for curiosity, yesterday I was thinking about Linux emulation and
| redhat OpenBSD packages. I would like to know if it is planned to
| switch to
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 02:01:22PM +0100, oliver simon wrote:
Hi Alex,
Alexander Bochmann wrote:
Hi,
...on Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 01:08:43PM +0100, oliver simon wrote:
hme1 - 10.50.0.10
hme0 - 217.5.23.69
hme0_alias - 217.5.23.70
default-gw is 10.50.0.1
If you want
Hi again .. ;-)
Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 02:01:22PM +0100, oliver simon wrote:
Hi Alex,
Alexander Bochmann wrote:
Hi,
...on Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 01:08:43PM +0100, oliver simon wrote:
hme1 - 10.50.0.10
hme0 - 217.5.23.69
hme0_alias - 217.5.23.70
default-gw is
Does not work ...
After putting your lines in pf.conf, it just puts out a syntax error !?
oliver simon wrote:
Hi again .. ;-)
Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 02:01:22PM +0100, oliver simon wrote:
Hi Alex,
Alexander Bochmann wrote:
Hi,
...on Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 01:08:43PM
Am Donnerstag, den 02.03.2006, 12:29 -0700 schrieb Spruell,
Darren-Perot:
Hi,
You would be well served by Netflow graphs. You can get traffic breakdowns
in a very granular fashion and the right frontend will allow you to drill
down in a very granular fashion. There are a couple of utils that
Hey folks,
i have an sun workstation in hand and had never had a previous
experience with sun hardare before. I would like redirect console to
serial port. These machine are very old, and hardware documentation
has been lost. It has a serial port, doesn't it?
I was trying to get X working, but
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 04:28:53PM +0100, David Elze wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 02.03.2006, 12:29 -0700 schrieb Spruell,
Darren-Perot:
Hi,
You would be well served by Netflow graphs. You can get traffic breakdowns
in a very granular fashion and the right frontend will allow you to drill
David Elze wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 02.03.2006, 12:29 -0700 schrieb Spruell,
Darren-Perot:
Hi,
You would be well served by Netflow graphs. You can get traffic breakdowns
in a very granular fashion and the right frontend will allow you to drill
down in a very granular fashion. There are a
David Elze wrote:
On the other hand, 'flowd -d' breaks with chdir(/nonexistent): No such
file or directory though the only configurable directory seems to be
the one in /etc/flowd.conf which is correct.
looks like the home directory of the unprivileged flowd _user_.
you should try 'usermod
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 03:03:23PM +0100, oliver simon wrote:
Hi again .. ;-)
Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 02:01:22PM +0100, oliver simon wrote:
Hi Alex,
Alexander Bochmann wrote:
Hi,
...on Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 01:08:43PM +0100, oliver simon wrote:
hme1 -
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 05:01:01PM +0100, Reyk Floeter wrote:
David Elze wrote:
On the other hand, 'flowd -d' breaks with chdir(/nonexistent): No such
file or directory though the only configurable directory seems to be
the one in /etc/flowd.conf which is correct.
looks like the home
On 3/3/06, Gustavo Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey folks,
i have an sun workstation in hand and had never had a previous
experience with sun hardare before. I would like redirect console to
serial port. These machine are very old, and hardware documentation
has been lost. It has a serial
Am Freitag, den 03.03.2006, 16:58 +0100 schrieb Joachim Schipper:
Hi,
I don't know about the rest, but a grep nonexistent /etc/passwd might
prove enlightening. ;-)
Uuups, thanks a lot!
CU
David
--
David Elze Tel:(+49)(0)441 - 36116410
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 01:58:27PM +0100, Paul de Weerd wrote:
Using another distribution (freely downloadable etc) will make it
easier to update the port in case of security issues after Red Hat
stopped fixing bugs in their legacy RPM's.
Not a very strong point, I agree, but a point
...on Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 03:03:23PM +0100, oliver simon wrote:
Internal Network is another IP-Range ... DMZ has official IPs for the
services and its private ip-range for the hosts themself.
DMZ: 10.50.0.0/24 + Official IPs for services
Internal(!)Lan: 10.23.0.0/24
DBNet (e.g.):
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 12:51:31PM -0300, Gustavo Rios wrote:
Hey folks,
i have an sun workstation in hand and had never had a previous
experience with sun hardare before. I would like redirect console to
serial port. These machine are very old, and hardware documentation
has been lost. It
Try this:
http://slashboot.org/openbsd/sparc64-openbsd38-xorg.conf
I've had it working just fine. I now run it without X, as a server.
Hope that helps,
Craig
Gustavo Rios wrote:
Hey folks,
i have an sun workstation in hand and had never had a previous
experience with sun hardare before. I
Still no success ...
On the next firewall, tcpdump only shows the private IP-Address from the
bsd-machine, trying to connect the outer world ...
17:51:38.109862 10.50.0.10.47888 83.146.78.121.ssh: S
3774377327:3774377327(0) win 16384 mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale
0,nop,nop,timestamp
Jason Crawford wrote:
there, sorry. But as far as getting serial console to work, all you
have to do is make sure that a keyboard and monitor are NOT plugged
Actually, just the keyboard has to be unplugged. :-)
--
Matthew Weigel
hacker
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here i am again with my new old sun ultra 1 boxes.
When playing with i386 boxes, i used to let a initial 63 sectors for
the boot procedure. So, i never used my whole disk. For sun, i don't
know whether i have to let some space or may just go using from sector
0.
/Thanks in advance.
On 3/3/06, Matthew Weigel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason Crawford wrote:
there, sorry. But as far as getting serial console to work, all you
have to do is make sure that a keyboard and monitor are NOT plugged
Actually, just the keyboard has to be unplugged. :-)
Cool since I sold my U5 and
Or, if you want to keep your keyboard plugged in:
At the Sun PROM ok prompt:
ok setenv input-device ttya
ok setenv output-device ttya
Will set your first com pport up for serial console work.
Connect to that a NULL serial cable and from another machine:
cu -l /dev/cua00 -s 9600
Should let you
Does anyone know if there are plans to create an individual port for the
now cyrus-sasl2-ldapdb plugin, similar to the FreeBSD port; or should I
redirect to @ports?
thanks..
if the x.x.x versioning is followed 4.0 would mean
there is a major upgrade to the OS, while 3.10 is
minor updates.
Just thinking about all the goodies that a 4.x OS
would mean.
Bryan
Bryan Brake wrote:
if the x.x.x versioning is followed 4.0 would mean there is a major
upgrade to the OS, while 3.10 is minor updates.
Just thinking about all the goodies that a 4.x OS would mean.
Bryan
What was it before. 2.9 to 3.0 or to 2.10???
Each release have major changes as far as
Hi
Is anybody using 802.11a with ath?
The manpage lists a/b/g as working, although g definitly doesn't work
for me, only b does. Now I'm curious if anything besides b actually
works before I buy an antenna for a.
Or is it just my cards? If not, why isn't there a note about this in
the manpage?
On Friday 03 March 2006 15:29, Bryan Brake wrote:
if the x.x.x versioning is followed 4.0 would mean
there is a major upgrade to the OS, while 3.10 is
minor updates.
Just thinking about all the goodies that a 4.x OS
would mean.
Bryan
This was beaten to death five years ago. What happened
On Fri, 03 Mar 2006 12:29:46 -0800 Bryan Brake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if the x.x.x versioning is followed 4.0 would mean
there is a major upgrade to the OS, while 3.10 is
minor updates.
Hmm, I wonder if this question was asked 5 years ago when 2.9 was
the latest release...
Just thinking
This is an automatic e-mail
Hello from Barcelona,
Thanks for sending your message (e-mail, accommodation form, etc.).
This is to acknowledge we have received it.
We'll be answering you very soon.
We remind you that our office is open from monday to friday, from 9am to 7pm,
and on saturdays from
Is anybody using 802.11a with ath?
The manpage lists a/b/g as working, although g definitly doesn't work
for me, only b does. Now I'm curious if anything besides b actually
works before I buy an antenna for a.
Or is it just my cards? If not, why isn't there a note about this in
the
* Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is anybody using 802.11a with ath?
The manpage lists a/b/g as working, although g definitly doesn't
work for me, only b does. Now I'm curious if anything besides b
actually works before I buy an antenna for a.
Or is it just my cards? If not, why isn't
Yep, the developers magically do more in the 6 months preceding 4.0
than the 6 months preceding any other release. That's definately how
it works.
We've been holding back about 50% of our work for each of the previous
4 releases, and now we are going to throw all those very large things
into
I'm not sure which way to jump with this question which is a
reflection of unskilled, inexperienced networking background.
This may not even be the right way to do it.
First: This is all something of a training exercise and not
an important production setup.
Summary:
I'm attempting
At 02:04 PM 3/3/2006 -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Yep, the developers magically do more in the 6 months preceding 4.0
than the 6 months preceding any other release. That's definately how
it works.
We've been holding back about 50% of our work for each of the previous
4 releases, and now we
Seconded (as if I needed to with Theo responding :P)
I have an old Atheros based cardbus adaptor that will supposedly do b+g but
I know for a fact not a, check the specs of the device please and do as Theo
asks... dmesg is useful.
Having said that... Theo it may interest you that the man
This was beaten to death five years ago. What happened after the 2.9
release? Using a little logic it shouldn't be too hard to figure it out...
Plus it is in the OpenBSD efficiency model too! Typing 4.0 is shorter
then typing 3.10. That's 33% more text to type. My finger would be tied
each
L. V. Lammert wrote:
At 02:04 PM 3/3/2006 -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Yep, the developers magically do more in the 6 months preceding 4.0
than the 6 months preceding any other release. That's definately how
it works.
We've been holding back about 50% of our work for each of the previous
4
uh, what did you just say? I don't understand.
What are you trying to do?
why would you need a second name server on your local LAN? The
netgear can only port forward for one. Are you trying to route
between the 2 nics on the OBSD machine?
Gmail b0rked your ASCII diagram.
--Bryan
On
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 12:29:46PM -0800, Bryan Brake wrote:
Just thinking about all the goodies that a 4.x OS
would mean.
a) 4 is the first non-prime, at least according to factor(6).
b) you need three bits for the number 4, so the 4.x release will
bust the current two bit major version
Hi Realtors,
Here is the invitation -- you cannot lose.
I am giving you 50,000 FSBO leads ...
OK, 50,000 leads from the whole country.
Larger states have more leads, smaller states
have fewer leads - logical.
Here's the deal ...
Order the March CD. Use the leads. Review the
Monthly Marketing
snip
b) you need three bits for the number 4, so the 4.x release will
bust the current two bit major version number limit.
snip
this is the best response so far. LOL!
--Bryan
* Bryan Brake [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-03 13:39]:
if the x.x.x versioning is followed 4.0 would mean
there is a major upgrade to the OS, while 3.10 is
minor updates.
Why would 4.0 mean that? where does it say that.
Unmitigated horseshit - and OpenBSD release is an openbsd
release.
--- Jean-So?=bastien Bour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthias Kilian a icrit :
a) 4 is the first non-prime, at least according to factor(6).
No, it is 1 :)
Explanation : a prime number can only be divided by two different
numbers : 1 and itself. 1 can only be divided by one number,
On Friday 03 March 2006 16:46, Bryan Irvine wrote:
Gmail b0rked your ASCII diagram.
Looks fine here when viewed with a fixed font, at least I think it does,
but I'm not sure what the question is either. I also fail to see the
logic in sending copies of connections to the netgear to the obsd
Reid Nichol a icrit :
--- Jean-So?=bastien Bour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthias Kilian a icrit :
a) 4 is the first non-prime, at least according to factor(6).
No, it is 1 :)
Explanation : a prime number can only be divided by two different
numbers : 1 and itself. 1 can
L. V. Lammert wrote:
You're been saving Adaptec Promise raidctl, for 4.0, right?
That, and NdisWrapper support.
No no not wrong, indeed I didn't talk about being positive. But being
prime is being positive (should have said it I agree) and have EXACTLY
TWO different divisors. And if 1 were prime you wouldn't have only one
unique decomposition in prime numbers ;) (for exemple, is 45 = 3x3x5 or
--- Jean-SC)bastien Bour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reid Nichol a icrit :
--- Jean-So?=bastien Bour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthias Kilian a icrit :
a) 4 is the first non-prime, at least according to factor(6).
No, it is 1 :)
Explanation : a prime number can
Pf's os detection of NMAP isn't working with NMAP 4.01. Pf detects NMAP
3.81 fine but not version 4.01. I don't have any other versions so I
don't know exactly which or at which version it stops working. This is
with openBSD 3.8, but the NMAP specific signatures in the cvs pf.os
seem
I find it interesting that you didn't send this entirely condisending
superior reply to the list. Now why is that?
--- Matthew Weigel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reid Nichol wrote:
I suggest at least looking into elementary number theory before
making such statements again.
You might want
I'm using relaydb to scan through my mailbox (maildir format) to
whitelist and blacklist. I do something like this in my Inbox:
for message in $MAILBASE/cur/*
do
cat $message | /usr/local/bin/relaydb -vwf /var/spamd/relaydb
done
The problem with this is that I keep messages in my Inbox; so,
Come on.
Hasn't the OpenBSD marketing department caught on yet.
OpenBSD XP or OpenBSD Vista is the obvious choice.
Like Windows Vista, there could be 5 versions of OpenBSD Vista.
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsvista/versions/default.mspx
OpenBSD Vista - Home Basic. (aka. Vista Home, Dave
OpenBSD Vista - Home Basic. (aka. Vista Home, Dave Fuestel)
Same as Home - Premium, but has all the man pages deleted to save
valuable space.
LOL! there could be a special mailing list for Vista users: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Original message
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 00:19:33 +0100
From: Jean-Sibastien Bour [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: what is next? 3.10 or 4.0???
To: misc@openbsd.org
Reid Nichol a icrit :
--- Jean-So?=bastien Bour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthias Kilian a icrit :
a) 4 is
On 3/3/06, Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 09:47:35PM +0700, Cahyo wrote:
I wish someone make this
http://www.docum.org/docum.org/faq/cache/65.html for obsd pf n altq,
because very useful for SOHO user for bandwidth efficiency, maybe have
another ideas
* Andrew Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Seconded (as if I needed to with Theo responding :P)
I have an old Atheros based cardbus adaptor that will supposedly do b
+g but I know for a fact not a, check the specs of the device please
and do as Theo asks... dmesg is useful.
Well, I'll not try a
Original message
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 19:04:32 -0800 (PST)
From: Reid Nichol [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: what is next? 3.10 or 4.0???
To: Matthew Weigel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
I find it interesting that you didn't send this entirely condisending
superior reply
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Reid Nichol wrote:
I find it interesting that you didn't send this entirely condisending
superior reply to the list. Now why is that?
because it is off topic. Please stop this thread, which has nothing
to do with OpenBSD anymore.
68 matches
Mail list logo
