bridge very slow after RTSP update

2006-12-27 Thread Reza Muhammad
Hey guys, Im having a problem with my bridge at home (running 4.0-current). I noticed that after the RTSP update on cvs, the bridge connection that transferring data in local network can only go up to 60 KB/s. I didn't change any of my settings though. Is this an expected behaviour? Btw,

Re: Thinkpad X40 running OpenBSD has trouble recognizing SD cards

2006-12-27 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 09:45:42PM -0600, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote: The other night I was playing with the SD card reader in my Thinkpad X40 (dmesg below), and I noticed it began misbehaving. The problem seemed to arise after issuing ``eject sd0'' (but I suspect that was purely

Repeat panic every 20 minutes with spamd enable

2006-12-27 Thread Daniel Ouellet
I am getting repeated panic on my server every 20 minutes or so when spamd is enable. This is on 4.0 and here is what I get inside /var/log/message. Two sampling of it. I did upgraded from 3.9 before as may be I thought I was getting a problem in 3.9, but it is still happening. I am going

Re: Repeat panic every 20 minutes with spamd enable

2006-12-27 Thread Pedro Martelletto
Do you see anything unusual on dmesg? -p.

Re: Thinkpad X40 running OpenBSD has trouble recognizing SD cards

2006-12-27 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2006/12/27 11:12, Claudio Jeker wrote: Upgrading my X40 BIOS seems to be impossible without some Virus Runtime Environment from Redmond. fwiw: the .exe non-diskette versions of BIOS and embedded controller updaters can be unpacked with cabextract to yield 1.44MB IMG files of bootable IBMDOS

Re: upgraded to current - need bnx firmware?

2006-12-27 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Ryan Flannery wrote on Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 07:26:59PM -0500: On 12/26/06, George C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just upgraded my 4.0 system to -current (GENERIC.MP), You mean, before that, you had a 4.0-release or -stable system? Just a wild guess since you explicitely mention the kernel: Did

TALQ_LAST and TAILQ_PREV macros broken

2006-12-27 Thread Alexander Farber
Hello, the TAILQ_LAST and TAILQ_PREV macros in sys/queue.h only work because by coincidence the head and the entry struct are similar (they both have 2 pointers: struct type* and struct type**). If you insert a char dummy in between: #define TAILQ_ENTRY(type)\

Re: TALQ_LAST and TAILQ_PREV macros broken

2006-12-27 Thread Philip Guenther
On 12/27/06, Alexander Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the TAILQ_LAST and TAILQ_PREV macros in sys/queue.h only work because by coincidence the head and the entry struct are similar (they both have 2 pointers: struct type* and struct type**). Umm, what makes you think that that is the result

firewall

2006-12-27 Thread Marc Ravensbergen
Hi, I have a little home network that I am trying to protect from the nasty outside world. I have previously used ipcop (linux based) as an all-in-one router / firewall / dns server... etc, and I would really like to have a similar setup again, only based on openbsd instead. If somebody could

Re: Repeat panic every 20 minutes with spamd enable

2006-12-27 Thread Daniel Ouellet
Pedro Martelletto wrote: Do you see anything unusual on dmesg? Not that I can see. Not different then before. OpenBSD 4.0 (GENERIC) #1107: Sat Sep 16 19:15:58 MDT 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC cpu0: AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2400+ (AuthenticAMD 686-class, 256KB L2

device is always busy with lsi megaraid sata300 8x

2006-12-27 Thread Didier Wiroth
Hello, I'm using current with a LSI megaraid sata300 8x (with barrery module). I have 3 hd which are configured like this (sd0+sd2 are raid5 and sd1 is raid0): Volume Status Size Device ami0 0 Online 10485760 sd0 RAID5 0 Online 400016015360 0:0.0 noencl

ntpd[24357]: sensor_probe sysctl: Cannot allocate memory on amd64

2006-12-27 Thread Didier Wiroth
Hello, Sorry ... me once more ;-) I'm running an amd64 system. NTPD is running and I noticed lots of these entries in /var/log/messages: ntpd[24357]: sensor_probe sysctl: Cannot allocate memory Here my dmesg: OpenBSD 4.0-current (GENERIC.MP_acpi) #4: Wed Dec 27 20:24:22 CET 2006 [EMAIL

Re: device is always busy with lsi megaraid sata300 8x

2006-12-27 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006, Didier Wiroth wrote: Hello, I'm using current with a LSI megaraid sata300 8x (with barrery module). I have 3 hd which are configured like this (sd0+sd2 are raid5 and sd1 is raid0): Volume Status Size Device ami0 0 Online 10485760 sd0

Re: ntpd[24357]: sensor_probe sysctl: Cannot allocate memory on amd64

2006-12-27 Thread Theo de Raadt
Sorry ... me once more ;-) I'm running an amd64 system. NTPD is running and I noticed lots of these entries in /var/log/messages: ntpd[24357]: sensor_probe sysctl: Cannot allocate memory You are not running -current. You are running something mixed together.

Re: ntpd[24357]: sensor_probe sysctl: Cannot allocate memory on amd64

2006-12-27 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006, Didier Wiroth wrote: Hello, Sorry ... me once more ;-) I'm running an amd64 system. NTPD is running and I noticed lots of these entries in /var/log/messages: ntpd[24357]: sensor_probe sysctl: Cannot allocate memory It's probably a case of kernel out of sync with

Re: firewall

2006-12-27 Thread Craig Skinner
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 01:26:55PM -0500, Marc Ravensbergen wrote: Hi, I have a little home network that I am trying to protect from the nasty outside world. What I would like to do is add the following features... 1) DNS server (for my private network only) so that my computers can use

Re: device is always busy with lsi megaraid sata300 8x

2006-12-27 Thread Didier Wiroth
Look at the order of fstab entries. You need to mount /home before /home/sources. After the login, the /home/sources is available and does not show any problem. But, whatever I try I'm not able to umount /home/sources: fstat return nothing $ sudo umount /home/sources umount:

Re: ntpd[24357]: sensor_probe sysctl: Cannot allocate memory on amd64

2006-12-27 Thread Didier Wiroth
- Original Message - From: Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wednesday, December 27, 2006 22:25 Subject: Re: ntpd[24357]: sensor_probe sysctl: Cannot allocate memory on amd64 To: Didier Wiroth [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: misc@openbsd.org Sorry ... me once more ;-) I'm running an amd64

Spamd Korea and Samsung

2006-12-27 Thread Peter Fraser
I run spamd with China and Korea blacklists turned on. We in general don't deal with Korea or China so it seemed like a good idea. But recently, I mailed Samsung a question (about a clp-510 printer) and I haven't received an answer. It occurred to me that rather then Samsung not answering, they

Re: upgraded to current - need bnx firmware?

2006-12-27 Thread George C
On 12/27/06, Ingo Schwarze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ryan Flannery wrote on Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 07:26:59PM -0500: On 12/26/06, George C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just upgraded my 4.0 system to -current (GENERIC.MP), You mean, before that, you had a 4.0-release or -stable system? Just a wild

Re: ntpd[24357]: sensor_probe sysctl: Cannot allocate memory on amd64

2006-12-27 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Didier Wiroth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: NTPD is running and I noticed lots of these entries in /var/log/messages: ntpd[24357]: sensor_probe sysctl: Cannot allocate memory Fallout from the sensors conversion. Index: sensors.c ===

Re: device is always busy with lsi megaraid sata300 8x

2006-12-27 Thread edgarz
Hi! I'm stupid or what, but how can you made raid 5 from 2 drives and raid 1 from 1 drive? :) Didier Wiroth wrote: Hello, I'm using current with a LSI megaraid sata300 8x (with barrery module). I have 3 hd which are configured like this (sd0+sd2 are raid5 and sd1 is raid0): Volume Status

Re: firewall

2006-12-27 Thread Bryan Irvine
squid really needs to have its own disk slice, or better yet, its own disk. The disk will only spin while you're surfin': or better yet! a ramdisk! #grep squid /etc/fstab /dev/wd0b /var/squid/cache mfs rw,async,-s=512000 0 0 You will need to re-initialize the cache at bootup. I use this in

unsupported usb flash disk

2006-12-27 Thread Markus Bergkvist
Tjenare, So, I received this 256MB USB flash disk today just to find out that I can't use it in my favourite OS. I figure I could send it to one of the developers, if someone is interested, but before going down that road perhaps there is someone at @misc that have a suggestion on how I can

Re: Spamd Korea and Samsung

2006-12-27 Thread Jacob Yocom-Piatt
Original message Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 15:46:57 -0500 From: Peter Fraser [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Spamd Korea and Samsung To: misc@openbsd.org I run spamd with China and Korea blacklists turned on. We in general don't deal with Korea or China so it seemed like a good idea. But

Re: upgraded to current - need bnx firmware?

2006-12-27 Thread Ingo Schwarze
George C wrote on Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 04:53:43PM -0500: I had a 4.0-release install right from the cd pack. That's fine, indeed. :-) I extracted the source from the cd and then updated it to -current (both /usr/src and /usr/src/sys). then i built the new kernel, This is not the safest

Re: Thinkpad X40 running OpenBSD has trouble recognizing SD cards

2006-12-27 Thread Matthew R. Dempsky
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 11:12:00AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote: I have the same issue on my X40. After I used the SD slot I need to reboot to make it work again. Hard reboot, not soft reboot, right? I have the feeling this is a BIOS issue as other X40 users (like uwe@) do not seem to have

Re: firewall

2006-12-27 Thread Martin Schröder
2006/12/27, Marc Ravensbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: - I have an HP Omnibook 5700ct (which refuses to die on me) to be used as the dedicated firewall - specs are: pentium 150 Mhz, 80 MB ram, 2- 3GB harddisk, cdrom (non bootable) and floppy. [...] What I would like to do is add the following

IPv6 and illegal prefixlen

2006-12-27 Thread Björn Ketelaars
Hello, I hit a snag in setting up IPv6 via a gif-interface. Im using the following hostname.gif0 on a snapshot (22-12-06): up giftunnel 212.182.166.172 64.71.128.81 up inet6 2001:470:1F01:::1AE1 2001:470:1F01:::1AE0 prefixlen 128 !route add -inet6 default 2001:470:1F01:::1AE0

Re: IPv6 and illegal prefixlen

2006-12-27 Thread Marco S Hyman
up giftunnel 212.182.166.172 64.71.128.81 up inet6 2001:470:1F01:::1AE1 2001:470:1F01:::1AE0 prefixlen 128 !route add -inet6 default 2001:470:1F01:::1AE0 Mine looks like this (and it works just fine) - hostname.gif0 - tunnel 208.201.244.208 208.201.234.221 inet6 alias

OpenVPN bridge

2006-12-27 Thread Pontus Stenetorp
Greetings everyone, I am trying to make the following configuration work. |-- Internet | V V Internal network - GW -OpenVPN- VPN Server The idea is that the GW should access the web normally and that all the internal network

Support for nforce_600i chipset

2006-12-27 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
hello, I am aware of nvidia NOT being a friendly company as far as documentation goes, and I was wondering if anyone knows if there is any operating system other than windows XP/VISTA that wold support this chipset in the near future. I have included a few links, as far as I can tell this is

Gigabit NICs for Soekris hardware

2006-12-27 Thread Matt Radtke
Good evening all Has anyone found a Gigabit NIC that works in a Soekris 4801? Bonus points if its small enough to fit in one of their cases as well. thanks -Matt Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

Re: Gigabit NICs for Soekris hardware

2006-12-27 Thread Diana Eichert
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006, Matt Radtke wrote: Good evening all Has anyone found a Gigabit NIC that works in a Soekris 4801? Bonus points if its small enough to fit in one of their cases as well. thanks -Matt Curious why you need a Gig NIC? Can't see a soekris firwalling at the PPS rate you

Greylisting question

2006-12-27 Thread Ramdas
Hi Group, I have just started using OpenBSD Spamd. I want to ask a few questions. In my current setup ( without Greylisting and OpenBSD :) ) I have a few servers who's real ip is not exposed to internet. These servers ( MX for my clients ) are in Load Balanced mode. So the MX is defined as

adduser, batch

2006-12-27 Thread Uwe Dippel
I can't seem to get the -batch to work. What I want, is to create user $stuid and group $stuid; of course put the user into their group; with a password $STUD. I have tried tens of combinations, but I don't get there, yet. I follow the two examples at the end of the man pages and do something

Re: adduser, batch

2006-12-27 Thread Darren Spruell
On 12/27/06, Uwe Dippel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't seem to get the -batch to work. What I want, is to create user $stuid and group $stuid; of course put the user into their group; with a password $STUD. I have tried tens of combinations, but I don't get there, yet. I follow the two

Re: adduser, batch

2006-12-27 Thread Uwe Dippel
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 22:35:07 -0700, Darren Spruell wrote: These invocations work here (OpenBSD 4.0-current): $ sudo adduser -batch test1 staff,wheel 'Test User 1' \ '$2a$06$kaLk/lPsfDpSibjO4frBf.WyoWOGY98illmMOL/bo6QsPTBmovsoC' (password crypt generated using 'encrypt -b 6'). $ sudo