Applied, thanks.
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 05:19:56PM +0200, S?bastien Marie wrote:
The patch seems to resolv the problem.
Only seems, because I only known to reproduce it for the 'tty' descriptor,
but I hope the 'null' descriptor will be in the same case :-)
But I will use this version
Gentile Cliente
Come parte dei nostri motivi di sicurezza, abbiamo regolarmente attivita
dello schermo nel sistema CartaSI. Di recente abbiamo contattato dopo
aver notato un problema sul tuo account. Abbiamo chiesto informazioni su
di voi per il seguente motivo: Recentemente abbiamo ricevuto una
On Sep 26, 2012, at 10:05 PM, rik rikc...@gmail.com wrote:
I haven't had yet the opportunity to upgrade it to -current, I'll do in the
next few days.
Perhaps this one will make a difference:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvsm=134436237406664
First, it would be better to start a new subject if it's not related to
the original post.
Squid need lot of disk space to be efficient and write a lot on the
disk, same for samba. I would not install those on a compact flash.
Maybe something like a Lanner FW-7535 would be better. Those
Definitely OT, but I second the FW-7535. Good gear and Lanner is easy
to work with direct even for small projects.
Hi,
Thanks for lighten me for the right choice, maybe alix build for
gateway/firewall ONLY is just good to go. Other services should be left to
other devices. I agreed samba and squid need a more efficient disk and that
is one of my concern.
My bad if my question disturb others topic -_-
This is current/i386on an IBM ThinkPad T40.
I am experiencing the same problems as described at
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/2008-09/1445.html
After a long(er) use, the ipw0 starts reporting
scan request failed (error=35)
and nothing but a reboot makes that go away.
[IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE]
[IMAGE]Buzios Enero- FebreroU$S 1270.-
[IMAGE]Imbassai Temporada bajaU$S 1740.-
[IMAGE]Natalen Baja!U$S 1505.-
[IMAGE]Porto Seguro en EneroU$S 1429.-
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]Cancúnen Baja!U$S 2310.-
[IMAGE]CubaHabana- VaraderoU$S 1655.-
[IMAGE]Puerto PlataEneroU$S 2835.-
RIPE 65 is happening this week and the following came to my attention.
I think it is of interest due to all the routing work happening in
OpenBSD. OpenBGPd was mentioned and a new RIPE WG on open source (esp
routing software) is being discussed
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 18:00:26 +0200
Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com wrote:
| On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 05:19:53PM +0200, Manuel Guesdon wrote:
| Hi,
|
| After checking cvs tree, it seems that ospf6d isn't following changes done
in
| ospfd.
|
| Is someone working on updating ospf6d
Hm. I can't seem to get npppd to map users to static addresses in the
npppd-users file, after trying various permutations of pool-address
##-## for static and such. The client is an iPhone running iOS 6.0,
and is definitely able to set up a working vpn over l2tp/ipsec with
the npppd server (many
Le 2012-09-27 10:36, Yusof Khalid - FreeBSD / OpenBSD a écrit :
Hi,
Thanks for lighten me for the right choice, maybe alix build for
gateway/firewall ONLY is just good to go. Other services should be left to
other devices. I agreed samba and squid need a more efficient disk and that
is one of
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Michel Blais mic...@targointernet.com wrote:
Same with LEI technologie, the're division in Canada.
Good catch. I now remember that was the actual entity I dealt with,
not Lanner. Started with the main Lanner sales office for NA, but they
directed me to LEI in
Hi,
I have just commited a rather deep change to the alias expansion logic
in smtpd. It fixes a bug reported by halex@ in virtual maps, where an
alias expanding to two different virtual users would end up being sent
only to the first one.
Alias expansion is tricky. We want to make sure that the
Hello OpenBSD world,
Has there been/are there plan to include some SSI functionality for BSD? I've
looked into Linux for this and the problem stems from the fact that the kernel
has to be patched with the code to perform this functionality. The linux
kernel, being a separate entity from the
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 01:04:23PM -0700, Brian Empson wrote:
Hello OpenBSD world,
Has there been/are there plan to include some SSI functionality for BSD? I've
looked into Linux for this and the problem stems from the fact that the
kernel has to be patched with the code to perform this
Le 2012-09-27 16:04, Brian Empson a écrit :
Has there been/are there plan to include some SSI functionality for BSD?
Try mod_include.
Doc here: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/mod/mod_include.html
Simon
The SSI I'm talking about would be defined as making multiple separate
machines appear as one single system with one single process space, a shared
root filesystem, and shared virtual IP. Shared memory doesn't seem that
important, except for maybe moving a process from one machine to another.
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 01:04:23PM -0700, Brian Empson wrote:
Hello OpenBSD world,
Has there been/are there plan to include some SSI functionality for BSD?
I've looked into Linux for this and the problem stems from the fact
For starters, what is SSI? As many TLAs go, it can mean multiple
things. I won't try to guess what you want.
Obviously, SSI is a recursive acronym for ``SSI Shrinks Information''.
I am surprised a CS veteran like you doesn't know this.
Grumpy
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Brian Empson brian_emp...@yahoo.com wrote:
The SSI I'm talking about would be defined as making multiple separate
machines appear as one single system with one single process space, a shared
root filesystem, and shared virtual IP. Shared memory doesn't seem that
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012, David Coppa wrote:
For starters, what is SSI? As many TLAs go, it can mean multiple
things. I won't try to guess what you want.
Here's my guess:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-system_image
I... I... I can hear Theo's eyes roll from *3000* miles away!
--
Monty
Hi,
I'm trying to determine if the performance I'm seeing between two
OpenBSD 5.1 IPSEC VPN endpoints is typical (or expected). I recognize
there are quite a few variables to consider and I'm sure I've not
toggled each one but I could use a sanity check regardless.
Question:
With the
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:16 PM, m brandenberg mcb...@panix.com wrote:
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012, David Coppa wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-system_image
I... I... I can hear Theo's eyes roll from *3000* miles away!
Meh, I don't see anything inherently insecure about SSI, I just don't
On 09/27/2012 05:16 PM, m brandenberg wrote:
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012, David Coppa wrote:
For starters, what is SSI? As many TLAs go, it can mean multiple
things. I won't try to guess what you want.
Here's my guess:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-system_image
I... I... I can hear
I think he means Single System Image
ben
On Sep 27, 2012, at 1:46 PM, Brian Empson brian_emp...@yahoo.com wrote:
The SSI I'm talking about would be defined as making multiple separate
machines appear as one single system with one single process space, a shared
root filesystem, and shared
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 01:04:23PM -0700, Brian Empson wrote:
Hello OpenBSD world,
Has there been/are there plan to include some SSI functionality
for BSD?
Single System Image was one of the original design goals for DragonFly,
but they seem to have backed away from that recently (or, at
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 14:37, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:16 PM, m brandenberg mcb...@panix.com wrote:
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012, David Coppa wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-system_image
I... I... I can hear Theo's eyes roll from *3000* miles away!
Meh, I don't
28 matches
Mail list logo
