Re: Gina/Adityha, followup on donation request re OpenPower devices Re: Interest in POWER platform?

Hi Mikael, I can't tell, are you trolling these people? Or, do you sincerely find these to be an effective set of techniques to convince other people of your beliefs? This is a pro bono email. Chris Mikael [mikael.ml...@gmail.com] wrote: > Hi IBM, > > This email followup was mostly to

Re: Difficulties with the sh manual page

>>yes, should be the same, see the cd coomand, >I meant, see the description of the cd command in the opengroup docs. Yes, ksh's and sh's cd seems to work the exact same way, despite man page of the latter not saying what it does when CDPATH is null. And about PPID Theo understood me right.

Re: Difficulties with the sh manual page

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:27:06PM -0400, Choose a display name wrote: > I don't quite understand the description of the PPID in the sh manual. > > >PPID The shell's parent process ID. Subshells have the same > > PPID as the parent of the current shell. > > PPID is the shell's parent's pid,

Re: Difficulties with the sh manual page

On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 09:03:43AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:27:06PM -0400, Choose a display name wrote: > > > I don't quite understand the description of the PPID in the sh manual. > > > > >PPID The shell's parent process ID. Subshells have the same > > > PPID as

Re: Difficulties with the sh manual page

On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 09:03:43AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:27:06PM -0400, Choose a display name wrote: > > > I don't quite understand the description of the PPID in the sh manual. > > > > >PPID The shell's parent process ID. Subshells have the same > > > PPID as

smtpd doesn't start

I'm faced with a problem on the stable. The moment a network interface goes up smtpd cannot be started. I mean, it hangs and gives no output, neither with -dv or -Fv options, it even hangs with -n. Without a network it still works as expected. I changed no related config, I believe. How could I

Re: ansible-playbook: Permission denied

Hi Predrag, On 05/24/17 23:20, Predrag Punosevac wrote: > Hi Martijn, > > Great hints. I was so tired yesterday and unable to think straight. > > # uname -a > OpenBSD apollo.autonlab.org 6.1 GENERIC.MP#6 amd64 > # ls -l

Re: usb MIDI keyboard

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:33:16PM -0400, David H. Rhodes Clymer wrote: > So, I'm attempting to set up my midi controller/keyboard. Since this > is not itself a synthesizer, I need to hook it up to a software > synthesizer via my computer. Thus far I've failed to get it working. > > My keyboard

Re: rc.d manual erratum

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:43:54PM -0400, Choose a display name wrote: > Section ENVIRONMENT in the rc.d manual starts with: > > >Daemon control scripts use a fixed number of sh(1) variables when starting a > >daemon. > >The following three can be overridden by site-specific values ... > > And

relayd DSR carp failover

Hi, I'm evaluating DSR with route to redirection on relayd on two carped boxes (kvm VMs) with current. Don't jump on me... The project is for a high volume download (http/ftp/rsync) server (mostly mirror/isos, including OpenBSD) and it would be nice if the streams are not get passed back

Re: Difficulties with the sh manual page

On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 09:47:08AM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote: > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 09:03:43AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:27:06PM -0400, Choose a display name wrote: > > > > > I don't quite understand the description of the PPID in the sh manual. > > > > > >

Re: Gina/Adityha, followup on donation request re OpenPower devices Re: Interest in POWER platform?

On Wed, 24 May 2017 23:30:33 -0700 > I can't tell, are you trolling these people? > > Or, do you sincerely find these to be an effective set of techniques > to convince other people of your beliefs? IBM's revenues have been falling for a while so my guess is the only hope being that you expect

Re: Difficulties with the sh manual page

On May 25, 2017 9:47:08 AM GMT+02:00, Theo Buehler wrote: >On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 09:03:43AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: >> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:27:06PM -0400, Choose a display name >wrote: >> >> > I don't quite understand the description of the PPID in the sh

Re: Gina/Adityha, followup on donation request re OpenPower devices Re: Interest in POWER platform?

On 2017-05-25, Mikael wrote: > This email followup was mostly to reflect that a member of the general > public has asked for the support that a donation of OpenPower devices would > lead to. > > Feel free to forward it to the person at your company who has the power to >

Re: Interest in POWER platform?

On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 2:05 PM, valerij zaporogeci wrote: > 2017-05-25 3:46 GMT+03:00, Chris Cappuccio : >> >> OpenBSD is moving ahead on armv7, arm64, and mips64 (loongson, octeon, sgi) >> as viable alternatives to i386/amd64. Other platforms are not well

Re: Interest in POWER platform?

2017-05-25 3:46 GMT+03:00, Chris Cappuccio : > > OpenBSD is moving ahead on armv7, arm64, and mips64 (loongson, octeon, sgi) > as viable alternatives to i386/amd64. Other platforms are not well supported > usually due to lack of available hardware and, therefore, developer >

Re: ldapd dies with assert failure

Allan Streib writes: >> assertion "p->upper >= p->lower" failed: file >> "/usr/src/usr.sbin/ldapd/btree.c", line 1949, function "btree_add_node" > > I found that running the same example on an unpatched machine worked: Well scratch that -- on another patched machine, I

bioctl crypto size limitation ?

I'm wondering if there is a limit to the size of a disk for full disk encryption. I'm trying to encrypt a 32Tb raid 6 drive on a lsi 9265-8i with 8 x 6Tb drives and it's failing with the error "unknown error". (very descriptive!) I was able to encrypt the 256Gb system disk without error

Valgrind W^X Violation

Hello Misc, I have been trying to get Valgrind to run on OpenBSD 6.1-release, with all errata applied via syspatch(8), and I am having no luck. When executing Valgrind against any binary (or no binary at all), it claims to run out of memory and dumps a W^X violation error into the dmesg output.

allowaperture and X11

I run stable OpenBSD on amd64 thinkpad and I found this in my Xorg.log: >checkDevMem: failed to open /dev/xf86 and /dev/mem >(Operation not permitted) >Check that you have set 'machdep.allowaperture=1' >in /etc/sysctl.conf and reboot your machine >refer to xf86(4) for details Do I need to follow

Re: Interest in POWER platform?

ok. thanks. i got it. there is no interest to make the kernel use page tables for itself. like this is not the case on other architectures.) btw, on ci20, you have 256 MB of RAM for the unmapped "feature" (another 256 is assigned to devices or reserved). I believe, 256 MB (25% of all the SDRAM)

boot problem - freeze after wskbd console keyboard

I have the following problem with a current snapshot, but also with an older 5.9 snaphot, so it might be more a hardware issue. Installation from the install61.iso works fine The problem is that while booting (in normal and also in single user mode) the boot process halts at the line wskbd0

Re: Interest in POWER platform?

> On May 25, 2017, at 8:28 AM, Karel Gardas wrote: > >> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 2:05 PM, valerij zaporogeci >> wrote: >> 2017-05-25 3:46 GMT+03:00, Chris Cappuccio : >>> >>> OpenBSD is moving ahead on armv7, arm64, and mips64

Re: inet6 nat-to (group) address selection algorithm question

On 18 May 2017 at 19:51, Adam Thompson wrote: > > So I’ve discovered that, when trying to do NAT66 (for a ULA network), a line like: > "match out on egress inet6 from !(egress:network) to any nat-to (egress:0)" > doesn’t work. (Yes, the network in this case is

Re: smtpd doesn't start

On 05/25/17 00:09, Choose a display name wrote: I'm faced with a problem on the stable. The moment a network interface goes up smtpd cannot be started. I mean, it hangs and gives no output, neither with -dv or -Fv options, it even hangs with -n. Without a network it still works as expected. I

Re: Happy birthday Theo!

At some point.. birthdays stop being happy. only speaking from experience.. :) On 05/20/17 05:26, flipchan wrote: Likewise happy birthday from sweden On May 19, 2017 11:16:26 AM GMT+02:00, Craig Skinner wrote: Best wishes.

Re: OpenBSD 6.1 on Lenovo P50

On 05/22/17 10:50, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 07:29:53PM +0200, L. Jankok wrote: Anybody running OpenBSD on a Lenovo P50 laptop? I am looking for tips and experiences. I don't have one but I looked up the specs online. I would not recommend this machine for OpenBSD

iked/ikev2 road warrior setup

Hello, I have two OpenBSD 6.1-stable boxes in a CARP cluster. There are 3 carp interfaces - carp0 = Internal network (with its own separate ISP) carp1 = Comcast carp2 = Verizon The interfaces are using 3 separate routing domains (the routing tables below omit entries not of interest):

Re: usb MIDI keyboard

On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 10:04:40AM +0200, Alexandre Ratchov wrote: > > > > I've installd midish, and attempted to configure it to take my keyboard > > input send it to the synthesizer. > > > > midish config: > > > > # Device 0: Arturia MKII > > dnew 0 "rmidi/0"ro > > > > # Device 1:

isakmpd listen address

Hello, I can't seem to find an option in isakmpd in order to have it listen only on one interface or IP address respectively. Is there an option for that I am not aware of? I just saw the -p option but that's for the port number. Thanks, M.

Re: isakmpd listen address

On 25.5.2017. 20:46, mabi wrote: > Hello, > I can't seem to find an option in isakmpd in order to have it listen only on > one interface or IP address respectively. Is there an option for that I am > not aware of? I just saw the -p option but that's for the port number. > Thanks, > M. > Hi,

Re: isakmpd listen address

Thanks so much I was looking at the wrong place and was expecting it to be a parameter... Original Message Subject: Re: isakmpd listen address Local Time: May 25, 2017 9:06 PM UTC Time: May 25, 2017 7:06 PM From: hrv...@srce.hr To: misc@openbsd.org On 25.5.2017. 20:46, mabi