> On 27 Feb 2018, at 05:04, niya wrote:
>
> hi
> using vmd in openbsd 6.2
> and following
> http://thecyberrecce.net/2017/01/15/secure-webservers-with-openbsd-6-0-setting-up-httpd-mariadb-and-php/
> i have setup openbsd running a webserver
> everything installed and the
On 2/27/2018 8:51 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2018/02/27 08:30, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
>> Not new at all.
>>
>> https://www.servethehome.com/intel-atom-c3338-benchmarks-why-denverton-is-so-sweet/
>>
>> https://www.servethehome.com/intel-atom-c3558-linux-benchmarks-and-review/
>>
>>
On 2/26/2018 6:26 PM, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
> Note on passing: the C2000 are officially retired and discontinued.
>
> Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
>
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 23:21, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
>> On 2018-02-26, OpenBSD user wrote: > Hello > > I want to
great news then
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 3:26 PM, Rupert Gallagher
wrote:
> Note on passing: the C2000 are officially retired and discontinued.
>
> Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
>
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 23:21, Stuart Henderson
> wrote:
>
> > On
Hi,
this is just too weird to not mention it.
If you write a function for a complicated task, designing the user
interface well requires hard work. But you might think that not
much can go wrong when designing a function for a trivial task.
Guess again...
Here is my new candidate for the
> Looks like ProtoMail Mobile could use some assistance with proper quoting...
> :)
That is not the only problem, look to a sample:
Tm90IG5ldyBhdCBhbGwuDQoNCmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnNlcnZldGhlaG9tZS5j
b20vaW50ZWwtYXRvbS1jMzMzOC1iZW5jaG1hcmtzLXdoeS1kZW52ZXJ0b24t
Going back to the subject, I still fail
Note on passing: the C2000 are officially retired and discontinued.
Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 23:21, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2018-02-26, OpenBSD user wrote: > Hello > > I want to build a OpenBSD
> firewall. And I have bought a Supermicro >
I suspect you can use groups, set it for a group and leave it out of
another group.
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:55 PM, Grzegorz Kowalczyk
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can an option be unset in a host declaration of dhcpd.conf(5)?
>
> I'm trying to set a generic "option routers
Hello,
I've just installed current on my new dell e5450, but encounter some
troubles.
1 of the 4 display CPU in Top is heating 50% for interrupts.
Concerning the installation process I did, I just followed the normal
process by booting bsd.rd and performing a standard install by getting
files
Hi,
can an option be unset in a host declaration of dhcpd.conf(5)?
I'm trying to set a generic "option routers A.B.C.D" option in a
subnet block and disable it in some host blocks.
I've already skimmed through dhcpd.conf(5) and dhcp-options(5) man
pages, to no avail.
I did not purchase the board, yet. The OP did. And he did well. Both Linux and
FreeBSD run on it.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On 27 February 2018 4:22 PM, Charlie Eddy wrote:
> Rupert, I strongly suggest you actively search as quickly as possible as
> Stuart
> On 27 Feb 2018, at 4:10 am, Pavel Korovin wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> After upgrading several hosts to -current I noticed that all my IPv6 tunnels
> via tunnelbroker stopped working. Recently introduced changes to gif(4)
> (since
> late December 2017) are too complex for me
Hello,
I reached this conclusion like Stuart says : if I configure a bandwidth above
4G, like for instance 50, pfctl says "number too big".
I checked in parse.y, the limit is UINT_MAX.
If I use 5G instead, it parses OK, but pfctl -sq shows another number. I guess
50 - UINT_MAX.
On 2018/02/27 08:30, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
> Not new at all.
>
> https://www.servethehome.com/intel-atom-c3338-benchmarks-why-denverton-is-so-sweet/
>
> https://www.servethehome.com/intel-atom-c3558-linux-benchmarks-and-review/
>
> https://www.servethehome.com/
>
Not new at all.
https://www.servethehome.com/intel-atom-c3338-benchmarks-why-denverton-is-so-sweet/
https://www.servethehome.com/intel-atom-c3558-linux-benchmarks-and-review/
https://www.servethehome.com/intel-atom-c3958-16-core-top-end-embedded-qat-linux-benchmarks-and-review/
Sent from
Le 2018-02-27 07:58, Mischa Peters a écrit :
On 27 Feb 2018, at 05:04, niya wrote:
hi
using vmd in openbsd 6.2
and following
http://thecyberrecce.net/2017/01/15/secure-webservers-with-openbsd-6-0-setting-up-httpd-mariadb-and-php/
i have setup openbsd running a webserver
Hello,
I can see that ftp.fsn.hu is available over HTTPS, but isn't listed in the
HTTPS part of the ftp.html
How can we reach the maintainer of the ftp.html?
Thanks.
I would "bump" the issue for this specific case, but I think it is a very
laughable mistake to argue over the definition of new.
Rupert, I strongly suggest you actively search as quickly as possible as
Stuart suggested, or return your product. Not the first time this has
happened so don't take it
What exactly does the pkg_check -F option? If I use it, it does some
filesystem check, and some "Locating unknown files".
At the end I get: "Locating unknown files: ok", "Locating unknown directories:
ok", and a long list of "not found" directories and files, like below.
Not found:
Some more info :
* This firewall used to run OpenBSD 5.7, with a similar performance. CPU0 was
around 10% idle. If I sent more traffic, I saw IFQ drops
* It just has been upgraded to 6.2. 3 cores are loaded now, the busiest is
around 50% idle. If I send more traffic, I see out discards on my IX
Tue, 27 Feb 2018 10:42:42 -0500 Mike
> On 2/27/2018 8:51 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2018/02/27 08:30, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
> >> Not new at all.
> >>
> >> https://www.servethehome.com/intel-atom-c3338-benchmarks-why-denverton-is-so-sweet/
> >>
> >>
Mihai,
Your extrapolation is the only issue here as OP did not describe a linear
causal relationship.
See below.
> I want to build a OpenBSD firewall. And I have bought a Supermicro
> SuperServer E200-9A. There is installed a A2SDi-4C-HLN4F motherboard in
it.
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 11:01 AM,
Hi Mike,
I got curious again and tried starting a second vmd process when there is
already a running vmd process. The new process causes the original process to
stop responding. As expected, this makes a mess of the disk image files already
loaded by the first vmd process.
I also tried
Hi Marcus,
Thank you a lot for responding.
Aha so dhcpd(8) will only listen to the interfaces that correspond to
the subnets specified in dhcpd.conf(8), thank you for clarifying.
What you say is, that dhcpd will make touch the interfaces that
equivalence-match with subnets listed in dhcpd.conf,
I am replacing my ancient X60 with an X130e of lesser age. This model
is previously found as working on misc.
When trying to install 6.2 (release) over Windows 10 there is no video
to see.
By booting miniroot62.fs from USB the kernel loads, but the "OpenBSD 6.2
" and subsequent boot
Hello,
pkg_add ...pub/OpenBSD/6.0/packages/amd64/no-ip-2.1.9p4.tgz
enable it with rcctl
.. ok, it works! heading for a sleep.
but in the morning: the OpenBSD router was not responding.
ok, omg, power off/on. don't know what happened, nothing in the logs.
ok, next day, the same, during the
Hello,
hmm, I went through the relevant man pages:
https://man.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi/OpenBSD-current/man1/doas.1
https://man.openbsd.org/doas.conf.5
but I cannot find a sudoedit alternative for the "doas".
Are there any?
Many thanks.
> On 28. Feb 2018, at 07:50, Hess THR wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> hmm, I went through the relevant man pages:
>
> https://man.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi/OpenBSD-current/man1/doas.1
> https://man.openbsd.org/doas.conf.5
>
> but I cannot find a sudoedit alternative for the
On 02/28, David Gwynne wrote:
> what is the status of sysctl net.inet.ipip ?
David, thank you! That was easy :)
Sorry for the noise.
$ sysctl net.inet.ipip.allow
net.inet.ipip.allow=0
# sysctl -w net.inet.ipip.allow=1
net.inet.ipip.allow: 0 -> 1
$ ping6 www.google.com
PING www.google.com
30 matches
Mail list logo