Re: MIMO in athn(4)

On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 10:53:29PM +1000, tomr wrote: > > I've been playing with an apu2 and an AR9280, which is supported by athn(4). > > It seems to perform terribly when I connect a second antenna. Is this > the expected behaviour currently? Is there some MIMO magic that isn't > yet

MIMO in athn(4)

I've been playing with an apu2 and an AR9280, which is supported by athn(4). It seems to perform terribly when I connect a second antenna. Is this the expected behaviour currently? Is there some MIMO magic that isn't yet implemented? Or do I just need to get the antenna spacing right? I see a

Re: ikev2 All incoming/outgoing traffic over IPsec?

> On May 11, 2018, at 06:21, Denis wrote: > > Hello, > > I have working ikev2 tunnel between two virtual aliased subnets. But no > traffic over IPsec tunnel from $ext_if on server machine to $ext_if on > client machine and vice-versa. Both machines are using in production

Re: MIMO in athn(4)

On 05/13/18 01:00, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Sat, May 12, 2018 at mybeautifulwifi10:53:29PM +1000, tomr wrote: >> >> I've been playing with an apu2 and an AR9280, which is supported by athn(4). >> >> It seems to perform terribly when I connect a second antenna. Is this >> the expected behaviour

Re: MIMO in athn(4)

On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 01:32:59AM +1000, tomr wrote: > With one antenna connected, I get about 60-80% signal on my iwm client > at a distance of approximately 5m. With two antennas connected, the same > client needs to be <1m away from the AP to connect at all, and even then > gets about <20%.b

Remote kernel debugging with kgdb and vmm

Hello, I'd like to dive into the bridge driver and I am trying to setup a kernel debugging environment. I chose to use VMM to do that but I don't seem to find a way to connect my local gdb to the VMM console. I guess I would need another serial device for KGDB, but I have not found how to do

Re: New lpd server

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 10:35:01AM -0400, Predrag Punosevac wrote: > Where can I learn more about the work on the new lpd server aside of > reading the code? I learnt about it from the OpenBSD Journal > > https://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article;sid=20180509184829 > > > Thank you! > Predrag >

Re: pf.conf "reply-to" routing parameter seemingly not working?

I cannot get reply-to working with if-bound under any circumstances. It works fine with floating, though. Is this expected behavior? The (similar) route-to option works fine with if-bound rules, and I cannot find any documentation that states reply-to cannot be used with if-bound rules. Assuming

Re: pf.conf "reply-to" routing parameter seemingly not working?

Apologies, correction: obsd3# pfctl -f /etc/pf.conf Should be: obsd2# pfctl -f /etc/pf.conf Joe On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 9:37 PM Joseph Crivello wrote: > I cannot get reply-to working with if-bound under any circumstances. It > works fine with floating, though. > Is

Edgerouter Lite snapshot dmesg

Good evening, all, Recently upgraded my ERL to a snapshot (5/10/18) to test out the octcrypto module that visa recently enabled. Install went as smoothly as can be expected, upon reboot I saw the octcrypto module load,and everything seems to be working great. I haven't had a chance to test out

Re: Cannot access internet with virtual switch

> Currently, I am using a bridge. From what I understand from the patch > and the cvsweb history, that patch is waiting for ok and commit. I've actually held back on that diff since it's a bit insufficient by itself. > This time, the switch does not close. However, I am still unable to > ping

Re: Cannot access internet with virtual switch

On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 8:54 PM, Ayaka Koshibe wrote: >> Currently, I am using a bridge. From what I understand from the patch >> and the cvsweb history, that patch is waiting for ok and commit. > > I've actually held back on that diff since it's a bit insufficient by itself.

Re: Cannot access internet with virtual switch

> tap0 is a control interface created by switchd to communicate with > switches. It won't carry normal network traffic. (Last bit of noise, and I'm done) Actually, I think I'm wrong here. I'll need to dig a bit more to answer correctly.