On Sat 18/05 11:39, David Mimms wrote:
> On 2019.05.17 11:41, Paco Esteban wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 May 2019, Joel Carnat wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu 16/05 08:55, Paco Esteban wrote:
> > > > Can't say about your VM. On my desktop:
> > > >
> > > > $ time (khard list | wc -l)
> > > >104
> > > >
On 2019.05.17 11:41, Paco Esteban wrote:
On Thu, 16 May 2019, Joel Carnat wrote:
On Thu 16/05 08:55, Paco Esteban wrote:
> Can't say about your VM. On my desktop:
>
> $ time (khard list | wc -l)
>104
> ( khard list | wc -l; ) 0.51s user 0.25s system 97% cpu 0.779 total
>
Is this
I run vanilla openBSD 6.5 on oVirt (KVM) with gluster as storage and it seems
OK for my needs but I never used khard.
What kind of slowness do you experience?
Maybe I can run some tests and see if the situation is the same on KVM.
Best Regards,
Strahil NikolovOn May 18, 2019 18:39, David Mimms
Hi,
I used amd64/install6.5.iso from ftp server,
OpenBSD 6.5 (guest on Virtualbox). FreeBSD-12.0 (host)
I would like to use qtcreator.
After I installed qt-creator from package ( #pkg_add qt-creator), I got the
following error.
$ qtcreator
QStandardPaths: XDG_RUNTIME_DIR not set, defaulting to
On Sat 18/05 19:15, Strahil wrote:
> I run vanilla openBSD 6.5 on oVirt (KVM) with gluster as storage and it seems
> OK for my needs but I never used khard.
> What kind of slowness do you experience?
> Maybe I can run some tests and see if the situation is the same on KVM.
>
Well, it takes
On 19/05/2019 02:08, Don Jackson wrote:
> I recently acquired a Supermicro 1019D-FRN8TP server with a X11SDV-8C-TP8
> motherboard.
>
> When i attempt to install 6.5, (via PXE or USB), none of the network
> interfaces are detected.
> A dmesg appears below, followed by a dmesg and ifconfig -a
Hi folks,
after the upgrade to 6.5 rc.firsttime was lucky to send me an EMail:
Path to firmware: http://firmware.openbsd.org/firmware/6.5/
Installing: inteldrm-firmware intel-firmware vmm-firmware rtwn-firmware
http://firmware.openbsd.org/firmware/6.5/: ftp: firmware.openbsd.org: no
address
> This could be improved for 6.6. Maybe you should set a marker in
> the filesystem instead, indicating that rc.firsttime was already run.
> The upgrade procedure could remove the marker.
This is pretty common during new installs. I think in 6.5 fw_update
is run automatically when the system
On 15/05/2019 0.17, Pekka Niiranen wrote:
Hello misc,
Anybody else encountered this issue:
I am using OpenBSD v6.3/6.4 with its Unbound as DNS server
in local subnet. It does not do any recursive DNS queries.
Reverse lookup works for VMware Esxi and Linux machines but not
for Windows 2016 or
I recently acquired a Supermicro 1019D-FRN8TP server with a X11SDV-8C-TP8
motherboard.
When i attempt to install 6.5, (via PXE or USB), none of the network interfaces
are detected.
A dmesg appears below, followed by a dmesg and ifconfig -a from successful
attempt installing FreeBSD 12.0
Any
> you can write a shell script to move given parameters into a special folder
> and make alias rm="that_script"
> and a rc script which empty this folder at boot/shutdown.
That is indeed the recommended approach for those who need it.
An example was published in the O'Reilly book Unix Power
Omar Polo wrote:
> What I think it's required to compile and run haskell program is to
> wxallow the partition. If you're using the standard layout the /tmp
> and /home should be wxallowed.
Yep, GHC creates binaries with W^X violations. The GHC developers are
working on this problem in [0], but
Matthias Kilian wrote:
> ps: please note that I'm not subscribed to misc@ with my 'real'
> mail account, only with a crappy gmail account I'm only reading on
> my tablet (from which I forwarded your mail to my real address). So
> better cc' me if you've any other questions ;-)
FYI, the way you
On Sat, 11 May 2019, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
Once in a while things break in current, but we keep that to a minimum.
*If* it happens, swift action is taken.
Experiments are mostly done outside the tree and only are committed
after we are confident it's an improvement.
Is there an advantage in
Le 2019-05-17 22:47, Edgar Pettijohn a écrit :
On May 17, 2019 3:14 PM, gwes wrote:
On 5/17/19 2:34 PM, Nathan Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 12:28 PM ropers wrote:
>
>
> In the history of the (Berkeley) Fast File System, has there ever been
> an attempt to implement DOS-like
On May 18, 2019 4:08 AM, Solène Rapenne wrote:
>
> Le 2019-05-17 22:47, Edgar Pettijohn a écrit :
> > On May 17, 2019 3:14 PM, gwes wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 5/17/19 2:34 PM, Nathan Hartman wrote:
> >> > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 12:28 PM ropers wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > In the history
Hi Roderick,
Roderick wrote on Sat, May 18, 2019 at 08:47:09AM +:
> On Sat, 11 May 2019, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>> Once in a while things break in current, but we keep that to a minimum.
>> *If* it happens, swift action is taken.
>>
>> Experiments are mostly done outside the tree and only are
On 14/5/19 6:07 pm, ULF wrote:
> On a mac, on a recent gnome, on a kde, etc. it's easier for a user to keep
> track of multiple jobs without thinking about the OS, but rather thinking
> about contents. It's a matter of fact that computers are mostly used to do
> things that have nothing to do with
18 matches
Mail list logo
