Hi,
for weird reasons I need to implement RELAYD (OpenBSD 6.5) to balance a
service running on the same host but on multiple ports.
something like:
---
protocol "proto_MyHttpProxyWithSSL" {
tcp { nodelay, sack, socket buffer 65536, backlog 100 }
hi everyone
i have a dual redundant firewall setup the same as the example given at
https://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/carp.html
i was originally with virgin media but have moved to a provider
offering ipv4, ipv6 and fixed ip addresses,
i am now trying to add ipv6 and pppoe to the firewall.
i
Hi,
I am using OpenBSD 6.4 and php version 5.6, I am trying to execute shell
commands through php file using exec, shell_exec or system (tried all of
them) but none is working.
Here is a sample code in my index.php file.
$output";
?>
Here is link
On Mon, 8 Jul 2019, Steve Litt wrote:
It's one thing to support an alternative: Quite another to call
for the death of the original.
Unfortunately it is not an alternative as I wrote before.
X11 is among other things a standard. If wayland imposes itself,
we will have soon programs for X
Hi,
i am a huge fan of sysupgrade. It works perfectly on my laptop where i
use all sets that OpenBSD provides. But now i want to start to use
sysupgrade on a router where i don't need the "x*" sets.
I looked at the manual here (https://man.openbsd.org/sysupgrade) but did
not find a way to
Leo Unglaub wrote:
> Hi,
> i am a huge fan of sysupgrade. It works perfectly on my laptop where i
> use all sets that OpenBSD provides. But now i want to start to use
> sysupgrade on a router where i don't need the "x*" sets.
>
> I looked at the manual here (https://man.openbsd.org/sysupgrade)
On 2019-07-09, ropers wrote:
> Just for the record, I think *my* (not the OP's) problem when trying
> to grep fstat results was that unlike lsof, fstat didn't show the
> former file names (hence unlinked); it only showed inodes, so I never
> got the "find this former file" part to work on
On 7/9/19 11:40 AM, mansoor wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using OpenBSD 6.4 and php version 5.6, I am trying to execute shell
> commands through php file using exec, shell_exec or system (tried all of
> them) but none is working.
>
> Here is a sample code in my index.php file.
>
> $output =
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 10:06 AM Raimo Niskanen <
raimo+open...@erix.ericsson.se> wrote:
> In /var/log/messages I find suspicious entries "/bsd: proc: table is full"
> possibly before the machines become inresponsive, but these entries appear
> many more times before that point. And after this
On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 10:33:46AM -0400, Kenneth Gober wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 10:06 AM Raimo Niskanen <
> raimo+open...@erix.ericsson.se> wrote:
>
> > In /var/log/messages I find suspicious entries "/bsd: proc: table is full"
> > possibly before the machines become inresponsive, but
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 2:43 PM Marc Espie wrote:
> - we do use gzip because other compression systems won't work with little
> memory/don't have the right licence.
You might find this interesting:
https://github.com/silentbicycle/heatshrink
> It is definately not a friendly place for people with a tone like yours.
Theo, your excuse that OpenBSD is not more popular than Linux because AT
sued BSD in 90's is ridiculous, that's your own fault for being so
terrible in technical field, also you are terrible person, just like
me you can't
On 09.07.19 15:13, Theo de Raadt wrote:
i am a huge fan of sysupgrade. It works perfectly on my laptop where i
use all sets that OpenBSD provides. But now i want to start to use
sysupgrade on a router where i don't need the "x*" sets.
I looked at the manual here
On Tue, 9 Jul 2019, cho...@jtan.com wrote:
Perhaps rather than whining that OpenBSD lacks some specific feature,
those who want it could write it?
Or perhaps better not. All depends on what is a feature and for whom.
I, as normal user, am glad that packages are not inflated with debugging
Hi,
I'm considering an option to evaluate connecting IPs before they're evaluated
by `pf` in order to make some decisions about the "reputation" of a connecting
IP. Then if that reputation is low enough, some action could either be taken:
in `pf` to protect the associated application (say by
> 9. jul. 2019 kl. 20:03 skrev Thomas Smith :
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm considering an option to evaluate connecting IPs before they're evaluated
> by `pf` in order to make some decisions about the "reputation" of a
> connecting IP. Then if that reputation is low enough, some action could
> either be
Please leave the list.
Leonid Bobrov wrote:
> > It is definately not a friendly place for people with a tone like yours.
>
> Theo, your excuse that OpenBSD is not more popular than Linux because AT
> sued BSD in 90's is ridiculous, that's your own fault for being so
> terrible in technical
Stop it now. You are being a troll.
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 1:09 PM Leonid Bobrov wrote:
> > It is definately not a friendly place for people with a tone like yours.
>
> Theo, your excuse that OpenBSD is not more popular than Linux because AT
> sued BSD in 90's is ridiculous, that's your own
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 1:13 PM Leonid Bobrov wrote:
> Theo, your excuse that OpenBSD is not more popular than Linux because AT
> sued BSD in 90's is ridiculous,
Nah, it's a relevant issue.
That said, it's not the only issue, which I imagine was the point you
were trying to get across.
--
Raul
On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 08:04:23PM +0300, Leonid Bobrov wrote:
> > An all-arches package snapshot currently runs at 200GB and adding
> > symbols across the board would add a lot to this.
>
> Stuart and Espie, have you ever heard of compression?
WTF is wrong with you ?
I haven't participated to
Perhaps rather than whining that OpenBSD lacks some specific feature, those who
want it could write it? A novel idea, I know, but it IS specifically a
development platform and there are precisely zero restrictions.
Or if you don't wish to start with code, at least try a tack such as "I intend
On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 11:03:36AM -0700, Thomas Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm considering an option to evaluate connecting IPs before they're evaluated
> by `pf` in order to make some decisions about the "reputation" of a
> connecting IP. Then if that reputation is low enough, some action could
HI
A much simpler option Is D.J. Bernstein's tcpserver in combination with
daemontools
I use it for all sorts of things including IP black listing into pf's tables
The packages are in the ports system
T
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On
Marc and Stuart (and whoever else was involved), thanks for the work
done on this stuff. It is simple and clean for me as a user and I have
trust in the integrity of what I'm receiving. I don't take it for
granted.
And there's probably a ton more involved that I'm not aware of yet,
but I trust in
> On 2019-07-09, ropers wrote:
>> Just for the record, I think *my* (not the OP's) problem when trying
>> to grep fstat results was that unlike lsof, fstat didn't show the
>> former file names (hence unlinked); it only showed inodes, so I never
>> got the "find this former file" part to work on
Hello. I'm having a bit of trouble getting wifi to work on a used
ThinkPad T60 with an AR5418 chipset, and gathered as much info as
possible by running sendbug as root. I can post the following to bugs@
if anybody thinks that would be more appropriate, but I had read
Martijn van Duren writes:
> You haven't given enough information for a definitive answer, but my
> guess is that you run php through php-fpm, which is by default chrooted
> to /var/www. Since shell_exec and system first call /bin/sh and you
> most likely didn't copy it to /var/www/bin/sh it
Jay Hart(jh...@kevla.org) on 2019.07.06 08:57:49 -0400:
> > On Sat, Jul 06, 2019 at 11:56:32AM BST, Jay Hart wrote:
> >> Good Morning,
> >>
> >> What is the simple way to have sysmerge "keep" all custom changes to the
> >> config files, during a
> >> system update from one stable release to the
>Agree this is likely the problem, unfortunately in PHP-land sometimes
>you can't avoid it. For platforms such as Drupal (just to pick an
>example I am familiar with) some of the modules will run shell commands
>to do things such as send email.
>
>Allan
The php mail() function runs /bin/sh
On 09/07/2019, cho...@jtan.com wrote:
> Perhaps rather than whining that OpenBSD lacks some specific feature, those
> who want it could write it? A novel idea, I know, but it IS specifically a
> development platform and there are precisely zero restrictions.
>
> Or if you don't wish to start with
Roman has, a nice mail setup on his blog that
describes sending mails without exec IIRC
https://www.romanzolotarev.com/
another alternative is to use postifx and maildrop folders or postdrop
folder ... I hope this helps
Tom Smyth
On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 at 00:31, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>
> >Agree
Aren't you that guy "Ywë Carlen" or something like that?
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019, 7:30 PM SOUL_OF_ROOT 55,
wrote:
> I installed openbsd 6.5 in Virtualbox for Windows 7, the following
> screenshots show it:
>
> [image: openbsd installation.png]
>
> [image: openbsd virtualbox2.png]
>
> [image:
32 matches
Mail list logo
