On 2019-10-21 16:19, 4642 wrote:
## Egress ###
pass in on egress inet proto udp from any to (egress:0) port 51820
rdr-to $wg_svr
pass out quick on egress inet
## LAN ###
pass in on $lan_if inet proto udp from any to (egress:0) port
51820 rdr-to $wg_svr
pass in
Good morning,
> Today acme-client renewed all but 2 of my domains; the two that have
> "alternative names" in the certificates. I cannot get it to renew
> those two. This is on amd64 on 6.6-current, updated today.
I can reproduce this on amd64 current, as well as on 6.6.
Same error and and
Thanks for suggestion's, i added some quick rules and put a more specific nat
rule in place and now the rdr rule is working. Thank you.
Sent from ProtonMail mobile
Original Message
On 22 Oct 2019, 07:26, loopw wrote:
> On 2019-10-21 16:19, [4642](tel:4642) wrote:
>> ##
Hi,
I ran another test with virtio net drivers on the same Q35 type vm guest in
KVM
and the pings were a lot more stable.
--- 10.4.24.1 ping statistics ---
1000 packets transmitted, 1000 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 0.223/0.394/3.766/0.172 ms
pcidump
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 5:11 AM List wrote:
>
> I'm sorry I might have not been so clear about it. I meant a way to
> encrypt the actual keydisk with a passphrase.
>
> On 2019-10-18 13:34, Jan Stary wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, October 16, 2019 11:06 PM, List
> >>> wrote:
> I was wondering
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 11:23 PM wrote:
>
> Frank Beuth writes:
> > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 11:54:18AM +0100, cho...@jtan.com wrote:
> > >Virtualisation is not a panacea. I have managed to achieve data loss
> > >through destructi
> > ve actions taken within a "safe" virtualised sandbox.
> >
> >
Hi there!
Any Ocaml experts around who managed to install 'owl'? Installation of
owl fails as 'eigen' and 'open-blas' fail to build.
I am running amd64-current.
Any suggestions what I might miss???
TIA!
Best,
STEFAN
8<~~~
$ opam switch list
# switch
Tommy Nevtelen wrote:
> I have some systems without access to the Internets and with internal
> mirrors for packages and fw_update packages. But when openbsd does a
> sysupgrade or a new install it runs fw_update against
> firmware.openbsd.org. The problem here is that it will hang until the
Hi!
I have some systems without access to the Internets and with internal
mirrors for packages and fw_update packages. But when openbsd does a
sysupgrade or a new install it runs fw_update against
firmware.openbsd.org. The problem here is that it will hang until the
timeout is reached.
#
Hello,
further to my testing of Iavf Intel Virtual Function drivers on Intel XL710
I attached the Q35 KVM virtual machine to the Intel XL710 physical function
(rather than the virtual function )
I with further testing using the SR-IOV interface PF function
the jitter issue was present ...
I have
I'm sorry I might have not been so clear about it. I meant a way to
encrypt the actual keydisk with a passphrase.
On 2019-10-18 13:34, Jan Stary wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, October 16, 2019 11:06 PM, List wrote:
I was wondering if there is a reason for the lack of keydisk encryption.
> $ man
Happy birthday! and of course a big *thank you* to the developers and
contributors.
On 10/19/19, STeve Andre' wrote:
> Happy birthday to OpenBSD!
>
>
--
Best regards
Sohrab Monfared
hi
ii will try tomorrow to do an backtrace after the panic.
i there additonal thinks what i can , or just this described in
https://www.openbsd.org/ddb.html
?
Holger
Am 22.10.19 um 07:10 schrieb Peter J. Philipp:
Hi,
The mail from Holger Glaess seems to be missing a backtrace. I got
Tommy Nevtelen wrote:
> I have some systems without access to the Internets and with internal
> mirrors for packages and fw_update packages. But when openbsd does a
> sysupgrade or a new install it runs fw_update against
> firmware.openbsd.org. The problem here is that it will hang until the
>
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 09:56:57AM +0100, Daniel Winters wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> > Today acme-client renewed all but 2 of my domains; the two that have
> > "alternative names" in the certificates. I cannot get it to renew
> > those two. This is on amd64 on 6.6-current, updated today.
>
> I
On 10/21/19 19:38, Ian Darwin wrote:
Today acme-client renewed all but 2 of my domains; the two that have "alternative
names"
in the certificates. I cannot get it to renew those two. This is on amd64 on
6.6-current,
updated today.
Just to follow up: Of my two problem domains, one was caused
I'd say something fishy is going on and believe it to be drm(4) related.
I don't run xfce but cwm(1) and with compton(1) as compositor since the
latter allows me to have blurred transparent backgrounds in xterm.
This setup hasn't worked for quite some time now (perhaps months?) but I
haven't had
Tommy Nevtelen [to...@nevtelen.com] wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have some systems without access to the Internets and with internal
> mirrors for packages and fw_update packages. But when openbsd does a
> sysupgrade or a new install it runs fw_update against firmware.openbsd.org.
> The problem here is
People occasionally comment about OpenBSD network performance.
A data point:
Two REs connected via a switch.
Looks like they are running as fast as they can.
REs are notoriously slow. Cheap though so they're everywhere.
Peaks at about 500mb/sec
Mostly filesystem limited on the OpenBSD end. We
g...@oat.com [g...@oat.com] wrote:
>
> Peaks at about 500mb/sec
tcpbench is a better test because it won't measure your disk i/o at the same
time
also, the realtek chip you mention has a hard limitation of around 500Mbps
on either transmit or receive, i'm not sure. this is according to luigi
On 10/22/19 11:06 PM, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
g...@oat.com [g...@oat.com] wrote:
Peaks at about 500mb/sec
tcpbench is a better test because it won't measure your disk i/o at the same
time
also, the realtek chip you mention has a hard limitation of around 500Mbps
on either transmit or
21 matches
Mail list logo
