> On Sun, Feb 02, 2020 at 09:24:20PM +, Arthur Wayside wrote:
> > Say I run a websapp inside a chroot and someone manages to hack it and gain
> > shell access. Can I then somehow hide my server's IP from the likes of
> > ifconfig?
If I let the window open at night,
and someone sneaks in
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 12:45:56PM -0500, Allan Streib wrote:
I used to use xxxterm, then xombrero, and really liked the minimal
approach and keyboard driven navigation.
Any other former users of this browser, what are you using today to
achieve any of this functionality in your browser?
Have
>
> Not sure I understand the whole hierarchy and flatness analogy, I'm very
> new to all of this, but what do I tell those who claim that this leaking of
> the IP poses a security risk and that they therefore should go with FreeBSD
> jails instead?
>
Use a VM if you need to win over "checkboxing
I've been told IP hiding inside FreeBSD jails is much easier, and that
potential intruders would only be able to see local IPs. Is there any truth to
that, and if so, why is this so hard to achieve on OpenBSD?
Thanks,
Ratah Tatah
Hi,
It looks like cdn.openbsd.org[1] doesn't sync the 6.6 packages for mips64el
from ftp.openbsd.org[2].
[1] http://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/6.6/packages/
[2] http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/6.6/packages/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Feb 02, 2020 at 09:42:52PM GMT, Charlie Burnett wrote:
> Hey @misc,
> I've used OpenBSD on my desktop and server for a while, however they both
> have an Ethernet connection. I recently got my hands on a thinkpad x1 6th
> gen in order to ensure compatibility with OpenBSD. I can connect
Den mån 3 feb. 2020 kl 07:18 skrev Frank Beuth :
> Otherwise it would be possible for an attacker to, for example, hack
> your webapp to have it phone home to some external server controlled by
> the attacker.
..and in the request logs see where the request comes from so this
information is
On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 10:08:52AM +, ratatatah wrote:
> I've been told IP hiding inside FreeBSD jails is much easier, and that
> potential intruders would only be able to see local IPs. Is there any truth
> to that, and if so, why is this so hard to achieve on OpenBSD?
>
> Thanks,
> Ratah
On 02-01 19:43, Strahil Nikolov wrote:
> On February 1, 2020 12:27:40 AM GMT+02:00, "Luke A. Call"
> wrote:
> >I am still seeing this problem, even after logging out/in and ulimit -u
> >shows 712. Running "ps -U myusername|less" yields about 180 lines and
> >the system becomes unable to start
Hello @misc-readers,
I'm not sure this is the correct forum. But I was wondering if any of you would
be interested in a keybase team? Using it for discussions, questions and a
closer contact way than via email.
If I am completely wrong about this I am truly sorry for the inconvenience.
Best
On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 10:46:03AM +0100, Janne Johansson wrote:
The attacker would thereby be able to find your IP
address.
By the time your opponent is running code on your server, this piece of
information is probably the least interesting part of the whole puzzle.
Not at all. For people
OpenIKED IKEv2 VPN setup consists of OpenBSD-6.6 based remote server and 6.6
based road warrior -
client with dynamic IP. VPN works stable even using a link behind ISP NAT with
ping latency from
~750ms to ~1100ms. Hope latency about 1000ms can't be related to the issue
because all the tests
Hi,
I am running Openbsd 6.6 at ThinkPad R61i with graphic card Intel GMA X3100. I
am getting errors like in the subject:
[drm] *ERROR* [CRTC:41:pipe ] flip_done timed out
[drm] *ERROR* [CONNECTOR:51:SVIDEO- ] flip_done timed out
And my laptop is booting quite long time, around 5 minutes.
On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 11:13:54AM +, ratatatah wrote:
> Hello Peter!
>
> Not sure I understand the whole hierarchy and flatness analogy, I'm very new
> to all of this, but what do I tell those who claim that this leaking of the
> IP poses a security risk and that they therefore should go
Hello Peter!
Not sure I understand the whole hierarchy and flatness analogy, I'm very new to
all of this, but what do I tell those who claim that this leaking of the IP
poses a security risk and that they therefore should go with FreeBSD jails
instead?
Thanks.
Sent with ProtonMail Secure
Some hosts should be limited in internet access and/or local access or
simply be restricted in some way because they are untrusted.
I'm looking for a possibility to isolate untrusted inside LAN using any
approach applicable. How do people isolate undesirable hosts in their
networks?
Cheers!
Dumitru Moldovan writes:
> Might want to look at https://github.com/tridactyl/tridactyl or
> https://github.com/lusakasa/saka-key. Have tried the former and didn't
> quite fancy it. Have just discovered the latter one, giving it a try…
Thanks for the tip on saka-key. It looks interesting and
On 02/03/20 16:33, Anne Wainwright wrote:
Hi,
OK, maybe this query should be for another mailing list.
Getting mail to my BSD 6.4 server has been an issue. I have Postfix
running. The mail is fetched by fetchmail. As far as I know both
.fetchmailrc and /etc/aliases are correct.
But the 550
The latest version of gcc is more picky about global variables resulting in
this bug report for my portable version of mg:
https://github.com/hboetes/mg/issues/12
To which Ulrich Müller created a pull request which fixed the problem:
https://github.com/hboetes/mg/pull/13/files
Is this worth
19 matches
Mail list logo
