‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, April 10, 2020 12:59 PM, Dumitru Moldovan wrote:
> Vultr is close to that. Last time I created a new VPS with them, I
> think they filtered port 25, but it was no big deal to get rid of that.
>
> Still running 2 productions VMs on Vultr, they are
I know about vultr, but they are filtering 25, 465 for sure and some other
ports. Especially, I need 25 port open for mail server I'm going to implement.
I mostly interesting in a small hoster with soft customer policies for long
term OpenBSD VPS hosting. It can be any ISP based VPS hoster or
i am not a c hotshot, so pardon my ignorance.
i read that all new code under openbsd has to be c99.
may i know what's so special about c99 over c89 which has been under heavy
use for so long?
also, does the mandate hold true for modifications to old (c89) code?
thank you.
I'm looking for relatively cheap VPS with OpenBSD installation support and with
~1Tb of unfiltered traffic. In any words all in/out VPS ports must be opened by
default.
Any recommendations?
Martin.
> 10. apr. 2020 kl. 11:51 skrev Martin :
>
> I'm looking for relatively cheap VPS with OpenBSD installation support and
> with ~1Tb of unfiltered traffic. In any words all in/out VPS ports must be
> opened by default.
> Any recommendations?
I would personally recommend the place where
Question about kernel randomization and relinking...
It seems to take a fair amount of RAM, at least for systems that
are forced to run i386. And I mean real RAM -- swap doesn't seem
to cut it.
I discovered that several machines I was intending on using for
minimal purposes just couldn't
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 09:51:41AM +, Martin wrote:
I'm looking for relatively cheap VPS with OpenBSD installation support and with
~1Tb of unfiltered traffic. In any words all in/out VPS ports must be opened by
default.
Any recommendations?
Vultr is close to that. Last time I created a
I run a few OpenBSD servers on vultr. They block outbound 25 by default like
most providers, but as long as you say you aren’t going to spam, they open it
for you no problem. 1000GB bandwidth on smaller VPS, 6000 on larger ones
-ols
--
Oliver Leaver-Smith
+44(0)114 360 1337
TZ=Europe/London
>
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 11:55:00AM +, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
> i am not a c hotshot, so pardon my ignorance.
> i read that all new code under openbsd has to be c99.
> may i know what's so special about c99 over c89 which has been under heavy
> use for so long?
Like duh, ISO-C99 bis mostly
From the man page:
"
These functions compare the NUL-terminated strings s1 and s2 and
return an [...].
strncasecmp() and strncasecmp_l() compare at most len characters.
"
Why NULL-terminated when comparing at most len characters?!
Rod.
I am succesfully relinking kernels on a landisk with 128MB of ram.
I think this conversation is ridiculous:
If a machine is too small, then it is too small. Do I have to paypal
a $0.05 to some users?
Nick Holland wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2020-04-10 10:10, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr
Because either string could be shorter than len.
strncasecmp() and strncasecmp_l() compare at most len characters.
^^^
"NUL-terminated string" is firmly explaining to people that in C,
a string is only a string if it ends in a NUL. There's
theo wrote:
> Because either string could be shorter than len.
>
> strncasecmp() and strncasecmp_l() compare at most len characters.
> ^^^
>
> "NUL-terminated string" is firmly explaining to people that in C,
> a string is only a string if it ends in a NUL. There's a large
> contingent of
"Roderick" wrote:
>
> On Fri, 10 Apr 2020, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
>> Because either string could be shorter than len.
>
> Thanks. I get it. :) My non-strings do not have a '\0' in the
> first len bytes and I need a case insensitive comparison.
> Of course I could ignore strncasecmp and use
Openbsd mirrors in Kazakhstan?
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 09:35:16AM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
> Question about kernel randomization and relinking...
>
> It seems to take a fair amount of RAM, at least for systems that
> are forced to run i386. And I mean real RAM -- swap doesn't seem
> to cut it.
>
> I discovered that
On 2020-04-10 10:10, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 09:35:16AM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
>> Question about kernel randomization and relinking...
>>
>> It seems to take a fair amount of RAM, at least for systems that
>> are forced to run i386. And I mean real RAM -- swap
> Yes could be, he has a "social engineering" approach to people. He places
> people and
> himself on the same level of machines. Then he searches vulnerability on
> persons.
> He makes extensive use of corruption to take advantage on his personal war.
> From this
> point of view also a vpn
I'm using Vultr to host my mail server. All it requires is a note to support
asking all mail ports be opened and they will comply. $5 US a month and they
support OpenBSD.
You could also look into https://openbsd.amsterdam/ for your hosting needs.
They seem to be just what you are looking for.
On Fri, 10 Apr 2020, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Because either string could be shorter than len.
Thanks. I get it. :) My non-strings do not have a '\0' in the
first len bytes and I need a case insensitive comparison.
Of course I could ignore strncasecmp and use tolower() to write
the trivial
On 2020-04-10 10:11, Nikita Stepanov wrote:
Openbsd mirrors in Kazakhstan?
The Russian mirror is hosted by Yandex. Moscow is likely the closest
mirror to Kazakhstan, otherwise I would recommend trying one of the CDN
options
Hi,
Christopher Turkel wrote on Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 02:49:56PM -0400:
> On Friday, April 10, 2020, Nikita Stepanov wrote:
>> Subject: Nvidia driver for OpenBSD?
> None exist or are likely to ever exist.
The question from the original poster was so imprecise and lazy
that no one else bothered
"Nikita Stepanov" wrote:
> I found https://man.openbsd.org/man4/nv.4
Then WTH did you ask?
Nevermind; n00bs gonna n00b, meguesses.
--zeurkous.
--
Friggin' Machines.
On 2020-04-10, Nikita Stepanov wrote:
>
>
It does, it's used for the NX bit for userland and kernel W^X.
But your question is not precise - if you mean "does OpenBSD support
RAM above 4GB on i386" the answer is no.
I found� https://man.openbsd.org/man4/nv.4
0:49, 11 апреля 2020 г., Christopher Turkel
:
None exist or are likely to ever exist.�
On Friday, April 10, 2020, Nikita Stepanov
wrote:
--
Отправлено из мобильного приложения
Яндекс.Почты
None exist or are likely to ever exist.
On Friday, April 10, 2020, Nikita Stepanov
wrote:
>
On 4/10/20 12:11 PM, Nikita Stepanov wrote:
Openbsd mirrors in Kazakhstan?
https://www.openbsd.org/ftp.html
doesn't look like it, you may be able to find one somewhat close though.
Haai,
> From the man page:
>
> "
> These functions compare the NUL-terminated strings s1 and s2 and
> return an [...].
>
> strncasecmp() and strncasecmp_l() compare at most len characters.
> "
>
> Why NULL-terminated when comparing at most len characters?!
Since, by design, one's not
Openbsd mirrors in Kazakhstan?
theo wrote:
> I think this conversation is ridiculous:
>
> If a machine is too small, then it is too small. Do I have to paypal
> a $0.05 to some users?
Yes, me! Pretty please? *kitty eyes*
Seriously: sometimes, a machine is perfectly adequate, except for one
task that eats disproportionate
Another one is the "transip.eu" from Netherlands. Native OpenBSD support,
tcp 25 blocked by default but you can change it whenever you want. KVM
based.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020, 17:04 wrote:
> I'm using Vultr to host my mail server. All it requires is a note to
> support asking all mail ports be
Why?
1:34, 11 апреля 2020 г., Nikita Stepanov
:
Upgrading from a 3-month old snapshot. Files from cdn.openbsd.org.
Upon boot in a VMware VM, it loads the kernel then fails to even
show the OpenBSD banner. After OpenBSD/amd64 BOOT 3.47 banner, booting
hd0a:/bsd: etc etc, then VMware reports an error. "A fault has
occurred causing a virtual
"Nikita Stepanov"
> Why?
'Cause the sun went dry, and the flowers said "bye".
Nasty of them, isn't it?
--zeur.
> 1:34, 11 aprelya 2020 g., Nikita Stepanov
> :
--
Friggin' Machines!
Because it would be a total PITA now and in the future and benefit only
that small set of machines that have >4GB of memory but that can't run
64bit.
Since you like one-liner questions: why do you care?
Why should any of us exert more effort than you're willing to
put into writing an email?
Nikita Stepanov wrote:
> Why?
38 matches
Mail list logo
