Re: S3 Virge support on IBM T23 for 6.6

On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 04:55:04PM +0200, Paolo Aglialoro wrote: > Hello, > > I read from the 6.5 to 6.6 upgrade guide that the following files: > > > */usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/s3_drv.la > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/s3_drv.so >

Re: Switchable graphics intel/ati - Fatal error during GPU init

Hi! Hemno Sapients wrote: >> If I try to run X11, it does not even attempt radeon and simply runs on >> intel i965. >> >> Am I missing some firmware? "fw_update" did not download me anything new. >> Or... some other "trick" ? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Riccardo >> > I don't think OpenBSD's build of

MultiPath / ADD_PATH for bgpd

Hi, Just wondering if anyone can help. I saw back in late 2018 that there were some initial plans for ADD_PATH and Multipath in bgpd, it was in a list on a slide right after the portable version. https://youtu.be/4gOoPxGKKjA?t=1500 Does anyone know if there are still plans in this area, or if

Unbound Notice: "sendto failed: No buffer space available"

PROBLEM: only one specific device continuously triggers Unbound notice VERSION: OpenBSD 6.6 FLAVOR: stable LATEST PATCH: "024: SECURITY FIX: April 7, 2020" DMESG: attached as "dmesg.txt" UNBOUND LOG: attached as "unbound.log" Dear community. After studying what I could find on this topic, it

Useful cwm patch [was: When will be created a great desktop experience for OpenBSD?]

On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 10:43:26AM +0100, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote: I like cwm(1) but it's still a bit green and isn't getting enough attention, I had to insist to get this first patch committed: https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech=149182817427598=2 This second one is still pending (no

broken link on openssh/legacy.htnl

Hello, there is one broken link on the openssh/legacy.html page: OSSH -> ftp://ftp.pdc.kth.se/pub/krypto/ossh/ Cheers, Alex

Re: S3 Virge support on IBM T23 for 6.6

Thank you for the explanation, Otto. Is this a hint that soon i386 architecture will be deprecated? Considering that supported hw (at least graphics) is going more and more to overlap with amd64, at the very end i386 would remain only for some routerboards. On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 8:14 PM Otto

Traffic inspection with relayd

Hello all, First off, I hope everyone is staying happy, healthy and sane in these difficult times. I've been working on a little side project involving some IoT devices and I'm in the need of a HTTPS MITM proxy so I can do some traffic analysis. I'm running OpenBSD 6.6 as my firewall at home

Re: Reduce attack surface - Tomcat and guacamole...

Hi, ich i understand right, think about putting a apache or nginx webserver in front, let him terminate the SSL connection including some authentication for example client certificates or at least http basic auth. The as you said, let the tomcat/jboss/whatever servlet container bind against

Re: Reduce attack surface - Tomcat and guacamole...

On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 at 11:56 AM, Steve Williams < st...@williamsitconsulting.com> wrote: > > > On 14/04/2020 4:13 p.m., Sriram Narayanan wrote: > > > > On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 at 6:03 AM, Steve Williams < > st...@williamsitconsulting.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> For a R project, I am trying to get

OpenBSD and Banana PI or armv7 in general

Good day folks, I  have sucessfully installed and configured a Beagle Bone Black, and using the GPIO on it, though it has to be configures in lower userlevel  ;  We plan to implement a small utility using a Banana PI in the future. A few insights could be helpful, is this a work  in  progress 

Re: OpenBSD and Banana PI or armv7 in general

try a...@openbsd.org list

Re: Unbound Notice: "sendto failed: No buffer space available"

On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 10:53:49PM +0200, Ben wrote: > I have exactly one device - an Apple smartphone - within one of the > subnets, that Unbound is not able to send "some" data. The log tells us > "sendto failed: No buffer space available". Beside the error message, > the device seems to work

Re: S3 Virge support on IBM T23 for 6.6

Wed, 15 Apr 2020 23:26:44 +0200 Paolo Aglialoro > Thank you for the explanation, Otto. > > Is this a hint that soon i386 architecture will be deprecated? Hello Paolo, Considering that it's worth reading the reply without misinterpreting anything, it is here quoting this again: "What other OS

RE: passive-aggressive questions

Haai, "zap" wrote: > > I think theo is about the same as Linus in how foul he can get... As meobserved, Theo's agression is more of passive kind. Dunno if that's an improvement... > but on the other hand, he at least doesn't wreck his software with > pointless things like redhat's crap,

Re: S3 Virge support on IBM T23 for 6.6

Ciao Paolo, Paolo Aglialoro wrote: > */usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/s3_drv.la > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/s3_drv.so > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/s3virge_drv.la > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/s3virge_drv.so/usr/X11R6/man/man4/s3.4 >

RE: I see you guys are full of shit when it comes to one thing:

"zap" wrote: > Also, by all means, please do ban me if you want. Me's never seen anyone on the list outright banned... However, replies to at least one thread have been (and are perhaps still being) filtered out. That thread involved a {loonie,troll} excessively cross-posting rather explosive

RE: passive-aggressive questions

theo wrote: > Nothing you are saying has any relevance to the use of OpenBSD. As much as one might wish it were, OpenBSD is *not* an island: the place of OpenBSD in the world *is* a relevant issue. Real life, y'know. > The chatter is useless. You just can't stand to see yourself being

RE: passive-aggressive questions

"j3s" wrote: > On 4/14/20 11:02 PM, zap wrote: >> I'll be honest, i like libre software, but, libre software that is >> insecure, aka redhat's bs, openssl, java, etc... is barely better than >> proprietary software. > > this is crap. That stuff sure shares a lot of traits w/ one's typical

RE: I see you guys are full of shit when it comes to one thing:

"zap" wrote: > you think proprietary softwatre is secure as much as linux loves being > shit. > >[and it just went downhill from there...] Please calm down. Somtimes mefeels the way you do, so meunderstands... however, me'd advise not to make a public scene. --zeurkous. P.S.:

Re: I see you guys are full of shit when it comes to one thing:

This isn't the airport, no need to announce your departure. On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 3:27 PM zap wrote: > > you think proprietary softwatre is secure as much as linux loves being > shit. > > > I had hoped you guys had better self respect, and had some moral > integrity within. > > And if you

Re: WLAN throughput less 10Mb/s

Hi everyone. I'm running also an APU2 board with an Atheros wlan chipset: athn0 at pci5 dev 0 function 0 "Atheros AR9281" rev 0x01: apic 5 int 16 athn0: AR9280 rev 2 (2T2R), ROM rev 22, address XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX I also used an ALIX board with an Atheros wlan chipset (AR9280). >From OpenBSD 6.0

S3 Virge support on IBM T23 for 6.6

Hello, I read from the 6.5 to 6.6 upgrade guide that the following files: */usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/s3_drv.la /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/s3_drv.so /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/s3virge_drv.la

Re: Reduce attack surface - Tomcat and guacamole...

On 2020-04-14, Steve Williams wrote: > Guacamole (I believe) needs to run under something like tomcat to serve > up the java war file & application. I looked at this before - it also requires guacamole-server to be built (written in C), it requires mutexes shared between different processes

Re: WLAN throughput less 10Mb/s

On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 06:45:26AM -0700, 0x6d6174 wrote: > Hi everyone. > > I'm running also an APU2 board with an Atheros wlan chipset: > > athn0 at pci5 dev 0 function 0 "Atheros AR9281" rev 0x01: apic 5 int 16 > athn0: AR9280 rev 2 (2T2R), ROM rev 22, address XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX > > I also