reinstalled, didn't
rebuild any of OpenBSD that time,
same behavior.
Fuller disclosure: hardware bought used on eBay, can't really be vouched for.
But Linux isn't having the problem.
Sound at all familiar?
Thanks,
- Jay
kernel, every single reason starts with the same
discouragement. :) )
In this case, Linux == Ubuntu 7.10.
Thanks,
- Jay
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; misc@openbsd.org
Subject: RE: geom network driver times out on sparc 4.2? Date: Sun, 11 May
2008 17:54:25 +0100 Are you running
question.
sparc won't run on my sparc64 machine.
If SPARC32 == SPARC32on64, I'll just do those two. If SPARC32 !=
SPARC32on64, I'll probably just do SPARC64.
Thanks, - Jay
Sorry, http://archive.openbsd.nu/?ml=openbsd-misca=2008-05m=7350623
shows all the newlines removed...
I'll see if I can edit below to fix
- Jay
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: SPARC32 ==
SPARC32on64?Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 22:49:20 +
I'm porting some oddball software
the default disklabel
and using a for add and going more with its defaults, instead of what
Solaris wanted. For once, I want more manual override..or for
setup to notice..and maybe guess there isn't enough space...
- Jay
$ dmesgconsole is keyboard/displayCopyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993
did tell me they see this in current, however I finally noticed this
promising note:
http://www.openbsd.org/plus43.html
Changes made between OpenBSD 4.2 and OpenBSD 4.3: Fixed watchdog timeouts
on gem(4).
Wireless is working surprisingly well, and my 4.3 CDs are en route. :)
- Jay
[ snip
. Setup doesn't show the whole
message but
I assume it is using the wrong numbers or something.
Thanks,
- Jay
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; misc@openbsd.org
Subject: RE: geom network driver times out on sparc 4.2? Date: Thu, 15 May
2008 01:40:00 +0100 apt-get upgrade left
not great.
- Jay
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 21:21:46 +0200 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; misc@openbsd.org Subject: Re:
geom network driver times out on sparc 4.2? So, just as I say this, the
page is at: http://www.SMTPS.net/netboot_flash_obp.html I did
and the
kernel;Specifically there are some boot blocks installed by the OS, and the
OpenBSD ones don't recognize the file format of the flash-update.
Darn.
Maybe there is a way?
- Jay
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: RE: geom network driver times
,
maybe identical.
Thanks again, I'll report back later (in case anyone cares..hey the mailing
list is misc, not dev-important.. :) )
- Jay
Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 09:42:20 +0200 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; misc@openbsd.org Subject: Re:
geom network
: cannot find jay-sun1 on
192.168.2.0, or maybe the other way around.
I don't know where this .0 came from. I relented then and edited /etc/hosts.
First I used a 192.168 range. But then I wonder, hm, maybe that conflicts with
the dhcp on the router? Maybe I should use a 10.* or such number. So I
a capital X. I mistyped that.
Now to open the machine and deal with the jumper...
- Jay
the OBP update.
Solaris setup had brought up X, now it fails to.
The machine came with Solaris, but when it booted, and went graphical, the LCD
couldn't keep up.. Oh well.
- Jay
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: RE: geom network driver times out
of installing something with
dependencies, something that takes a while,where I walk away and come back
much later, these important messages, these messages aboutoptional manual
configuration, should be collected somewhere for my perusal.
Maybe they already are?
Thanks, - Jay
sure this isn't a good bug report, and debatable, so misc...
- Jay
, I don't see why swap should be much, certainly more than 512meg.
- Jay
CC: misc@openbsd.org From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: possible setup bug -- chose of default a partition can be
wrong like if it is swap Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 10:26:03 -0700 On May
18, 2008
| tee lookthroughthislater.txt I guess I should use
tee or more.
Ah, this is close:
cd /var/db/pkg
pkg_info -M *
You know, at least it tells me for everything installed on my machine, not
necessarily sorted by time or anything.
- Jay
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 18:22:17 +0200 From: [EMAIL
for the premium service
to remove the annoying signature ads..)
- Jay
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 23:53:14 +0200 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: misc@openbsd.org Subject: Re: port/package messages
about manual optional configuration? Hi! [Your quoting is severly messed
up, please fix
i found your link and thought you might be able to help me ive been trying to
make a bootable iso that if i load it to a flash drive using yumi or xboot or
even burn to a disk it will load so far ive tried magic iso power iso ultra iso
win iso img burn free iso creator win32 disk imager easy
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 02:07:16PM -0500, eric wrote:
It seems that tar(1) is only able to archive filenames of 100 characters or
less. However, ufs can handle (I've been testing using touch(1)) filenames
up to 255 characters. I tried to modify the following in src/bin/pax/tar.h
#define
), but it'll
do simple mirroring.
--jay
On 5/20/05, Gerardo Santana Gsmez Garrido [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know, maybe it's a matter of uses and costumes but...
I wonder why people would need printed manuals to actually read them.
Yes, I know the convenience of having them printed but... not reading
them in the first (or
On 5/20/05, Vladislav Belogrudov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.. or from solaris, where s8 MUST run under s10 #:)
They put millions into making their systems compatible
(RESPECT)
Actually, there's some pretty prominent misinformation out there.
_Abolute OpenBSD_ (No Strarch) claims that one of
not: they originate someplace else, but they trick
users into doing something locally, and they need to be treated as
such.
-- jay
daggerquill [at] gmail [dot] com
http://www.engatiki.org
One of my servers started having problems after it had been stable for about 10
months. Communications in/out of the box would just stop or the machine would
crash. We were able to log in at the console. A ping command returned the error
message no buffer space available. I searched the list
If anyone is interested, I have five of the cases at the following website for
sale.
http://www.kevla.org/cases
Jay
I have one of these, http://calpc.com/catalog/mid_tower.html, and its quite
beefy.
Henning,
You are right, it is ~/.forward
Any suggestions?
* Jay Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-11 17:58]:
Regardless, I can't seem to get mail forwarding working. The two main
openbsd
books say all I need to do is create a .forwarding file and give the name of
the email address to forward
for delivery, they are getting hung because [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not
exist as a valid account on my email server. But, why aren't they being sent
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your advice greatly appreciated.
Jay
On Feb 11, 2008 8:55 AM, Jay Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regardless, I can't seem to get mail
to get the email delivered
from root, to another account on my email server sitting behind the firewall?
Jay
Yes, I too at one time bought a huge case. Has 10 5.25 bays. Only problem
is
that you can't use all of them due to cable length limitations.
Multiple controllers?
Onboard IDE controller (pri and sec interface) and a Adaptec 2940 SCSI card.
I have one of these,
Yes, I too at one time bought a huge case. Has 10 5.25 bays. Only problem is
that you can't use all of them due to cable length limitations.
With SCSI2, could use up to 4 prior to exceeding 36 inch cable limit. Then
could use two more for IDE. But the other 4, never could use.
J
I have one of
this problem
But either these don't apply to 4.0, or 4.0 is not having patches created
anymore.
That is the official policy for older releases with regards to patches?
Thanks,
Jay
2008/2/22, Antonio Lobato [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all!
I read http://openbsd.org/security.html (and stable.html
Jay Hart schrieb:
One question I have is if 4.0 is stilled being patched? I notice that there
are several patches out in 4.2 or 4.1, for example:
005: RELIABILITY FIX: January 11, 2008 All architectures
A missing NULL pointer check can lead to a kernel panic.
A source code patch exists
On base OpenBSD 4.2.
What package should I install to get the above library?
Thanks,
Jay
to apply patch
004 (the pf patch) under 4.2.
I've updated the index line (changed it from sys to src, but I still can't
apply the patch.
What other trick do i need to do to get this patch applied?
TIA,
Jay
On Sat, 2008-02-23 at 12:30 -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
No, do not make a symbolic link
can't
apply the patch.
What other trick do i need to do to get this patch applied?
TIA,
Jay
On 24/02/2008, at 10:44 AM, Jay Hart wrote:
I see that there is some problem trying to apply patch 004 (the pf
patch)
under 4.2. Looks like there was some discussion late in Mov 07
about fixing
the patch to correct for wrong path / missing directory tree in the
patch.
I've updated
On 24/02/2008, at 11:15 AM, Jay Hart wrote:
On 24/02/2008, at 10:44 AM, Jay Hart wrote:
I see that there is some problem trying to apply patch 004 (the pf
patch)
under 4.2. Looks like there was some discussion late in Mov 07
about fixing
the patch to correct for wrong path / missing
On 24/02/2008, at 11:15 AM, Jay Hart wrote:
On 24/02/2008, at 10:44 AM, Jay Hart wrote:
I see that there is some problem trying to apply patch 004 (the pf
patch)
under 4.2. Looks like there was some discussion late in Mov 07
about fixing
the patch to correct for wrong path / missing
On 2008-02-23, Jay Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see that there is some problem trying to apply patch 004 (the pf patch)
under 4.2. Looks like there was some discussion late in Mov 07 about fixing
the patch to correct for wrong path / missing directory tree in the patch.
I just checked-out
within the /etc
directory, but what?
TIA,
Jay
On Feb 23, 2008, at 6:29 PM, Jay Hart wrote:
I use bash as my shell.
I'm trying to set the bash prompt to display:
ttyC1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've created a .bashrc in the users home directory (in this case
root), and
used the following line:
PS1=\l [EMAIL PROTECTED] #
So, what happens
I will take your's and Nick's advice, and change root shell back to ksh.
Thanks,
Jay
I have seen the following sort of remarks a couple of
times this past week, yet I haven't seen them corrected.
Nick Holland is such an excellent writer that, as often
as not, you don't need to look
While I have no stake in this issue, I think as a user /bsd and /bsd.mp are
fine. As a new user, I have to determine what the diff is between /bsd and
/bsd.mp now, and if it was changed to /bsd.up and /bsd.mp, I'd still have to
determine which was which.
Am I missing something?
Jay
OpenBSD
It would be great if the devs could get back to the list which card(s) they
wanted, so that its not a crap-shoot if an available card is what they need.
I'm looking on my end for anything available, but a more directed search would
be great.
Jay
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 9:14 AM, J.C. Roberts
Can you use the following:
Not sure what the model number is, guess it's the number that
looks like the serial number. But it's revision sticker has
-05REV50
The model number might be this one:
98081 2A3
Got any clue what this might be?
Jay
It would be great if the devs could get back
Edd,
I was able to have the person owning this card get the following number from it:
Ok, I have a white sticker with the following:
5014788055938
Let me know is this number works for you, I will try to determine what type of
system it is in.
Jay
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 08:52:41PM -0500, Jay
On Friday 29 February 2008, Edd Barrett wrote:
On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 03:01:54PM -0500, Jay Hart wrote:
Edd,
I was able to have the person owning this card get the following
number from it:
Ok, I have a white sticker with the following:
5014788055938
Let me know
, it also had crappy case fans which I replaced, and it has been solid for
over a year as well.
Check out www.caseoutlet.com. I like these systems...
Jay
On Mon, 2007-12-24 at 13:29 +0100, Joerg Zinke wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for hardware to install an openbsd based dsl-router.
I already
.
Perhaps you got a bad board in your past?
I have a thin client with an ECS motherboard and VIA C3 Samuel -- the
earlier version of the CPU -- and OpenBSD 4.2 runs great on it.
I second that, I have a VIA C7 running running 4.2, and works fine.
Jay
I have a mini-itx box based on a migrus motherbaord which uses a VIA C7
processor. Its been running for over a year without any problems.
The box is a router and firewall doing NAT for five PCs.
I bought a system from www.caseoutlet.com.
Jay
Hi all,
Have anyone tried to run OpenBSD with pf
I have the following hardware:
Viking Component Memory Module (2 pieces)
9525253 Rev B
Came out of a Sparc, but can't remember which type
Antares Microsystems PCI UWD SCSI Host Adapter (Part# P-0060)
I think this is a P-0060
ASM #: 20-052-0060
Jay
I will drink a beer to commemorate our lose.
Jay
...was rather unspectacular: Hardware failiure.
The system's name was base, originally installed with
OpenBSD 2.3 on Jun 12, 1998:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 5 Jun 12 1998 etc/myname
It ran the OpenBSD 2.3 kernel and most of the userland
On 16 Sep 2006 17:30:10 -0700, Randal L. Schwartz merlyn@stonehenge.com
wrote:
Gilles == Gilles Chehade [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gilles I am looking for companies that provide OpenBSD-powered dedicated
Gilles hosting. Currently, I am being hosted by a french company which
Gilles turned
Maybe we could create a fake blog site stating that MSN.COM is offline until
the M$Soft-Yahoo deal is completed.
Would that help you out.
Jay
I know, Who cares? or Great! is my own response but my users have
other wishes that include msn.com and this one has me stumped.
I had a more
I believe he was volunteering to rewrite the kernel using VB 6.0, but I could
be wrong.
Jay
And what
If it's not spam,than I think,that devs of OpenBSD want your physical and real
experience,like programs and so on.Not a list of names.My list will be
longer,but I don't think,that I can
BMWs
jose thomas wrote:
Herewith I am sending my resume with this letter. I have more than 3 years
of experience and below mentioned is my skill set.
Mumps, ClearCase, ClearQuest, Siebel 7.0, Lab, HL7, HIPAA, VB 6.0, VB.Net,
HTML, Infragistics and SQL Server 2000
I have heard about
Spot on!!!
Jay
What a funny message :-)
I want manual for DoS attack too.And for phishing,cracking,DDoS,remote
execution of code,Buffer overflow and many others.Why to learn something?Just
give me the manual now.
I have help for you.Use google,buy some books and learn,read and try all new
were negative. Hey, most troubleshooting
efforts are process of elimination anyway. Keep trying things till you figure
it out. I've spent weeks working on issues before.
Jay
And then i had two guys getting offended because i fail to see the
almighty importance of DNS.
Since i think it's a waste
Theo de Raadt wrote:
Pre-orders for OpenBSD 4.4 (CD, tshirt, poster) are up at
http://www.openbsd.org/orders.html
Do the first X number of pre-orders get autographed... or something :)
Direct ship your copy to me, I'll test it out for you, sign that its a good
copy, and send it
I consider email from this place spam. I'm wondering why its not filtered?
Jay
Top Shop
Top e-revija: 26 l 5. septembar 2008.
Najbolja praktiD
na reE!enja i saveti za bolji Eivot
PoD
etna l Budi fit l Lepota l Zdravlje l Kuhinja i domaDinstvo
Zabava i deca l Carstvo igraD
aka l Knjige
Hi there,
I am trying to use sendmail to send messages from a self-protecting
server running PF. I'm only interested in sending mail from the
server itself so the default configuration of sendmail is fine. Sendmail
works as expected when PF is disabled, and fails (obviously) when it's
enabled. I
Just need to know what to let in.
ext_if=dc0
trusted = REMOVED
webports = { http }
table blockedips persist file /etc/pf.blockedip.conf
set block-policy return
set optimization aggressive
scrub in all
antispoof for $ext_if
pass in quick on $ext_if inet proto tcp from $trusted to $ext_if port
In response to people who keep telling me to allow SMTP out: that has
not and will not help since no outgoing packets are ever filtered.
A quick check to pflog reveals many such lines:
Dec 02 02:37:42.368333 rule 5/(match) block in on dc0: \
68.87.69.146.53 192.168.1.102.17175: 41421
Keeping state on the outgoing connections worked like a charm. I also
took your advice and removed quick from my SSH rule (don't recall
why I had it there in the first place). Thanks to everyone for their help.
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 3:11 AM, Martin Toft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You have
new on my day off. Maybe someday I'll be more than a
hobbyist.
Sorry, list, for the noise.
--
Jay Huldeen
j...@huldeen.com
.
There's apparently no installboot here.
Thanks,
- Jay
with an empty ext2 partition, and see what
the installer does. I should have copied the install files somewhere,
downloading
them repeatedly now (twice already, I can wait, but I'm wasting bandwidth).
- Jay
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 17:07:26 +
From: m
RT2561C, RF RT2527
Thanks,
- Jay
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 17:54:41 +
From: m...@online.fr
To: jay.kr...@cornell.edu
CC: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: trouble autobooting loongson on gdium?
Does it work after the installation? The installation media
of -lX11 fixes it.
I suppose there is a goal to enable using -lX11 without using -pthread?
And I suppose -static isn't meant to be much supported?
Merging libpthread into libc is the way imho.
- Jay
Oh, yeah, good guess. :)
I do have OpenBSD on a separate USB flash drive, not in the G position.
- Jay
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:30:59 +
From: m...@online.fr
To: jay.kr...@cornell.edu
CC: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: trouble autobooting
, and maybe sparc64.
But I'd rather not resort to this.
(see
http://modula3.elegosoft.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/cm3/m3-libs/m3core/src/unix/C
ommon/context/setjmp)
Thanks,
- Jay
or desired for long.
- Jay
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:30:52 -0400
Subject: Re: -static -lX11 breaks pthreads (4.6)
From: ted.unangst@
To: jay.krell@
CC: misc@
...
can get this to work I can stop hacking jmpbuf.
The code seems ok on MacOSX and Linux.
Thanks,
- Jay
#include assert.h
#include errno.h
#include setjmp.h
#include stdio.h
#include stdlib.h
#include string.h
#include stddef.h
#include unistd.h
#include signal.h
#include sys/mman.h
#include sys
Thanks David, done.
- Jay
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:28:10 +0200
Subject: Re: kill/sigsuspend vs. cc -pthread?
From: dco...@gmail.com
To: jay.kr...@cornell.edu
CC: misc@openbsd.org
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Jay K wrote:
Following 163
realize it not a small thing.
Thanks,
- Jay
Right, thanks, I forgot to check boehm-gc. I believe others have
learned/borrowed from it. Will do that next week. I am running successfully on
mips64 (gdium). Had to come up with new (to me) trick for makecontext related
to register T9/$25.
Jay/phone
To: jay.kr...@cornell.edu
From: s
I've looked all over www.openbsd.org.
Any sort of guide/projects for new wannabe developers?
(not new to programming)
Just the bug list?
Fix something send diffs?
- Jay
Ok, thanks all. Later.
- Jay
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 12:14:30 +0100
From: vex...@gmail.com
To: jay.kr...@cornell.edu
CC: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: developing openbsd?
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 08:23:03AM +, Jay K wrote:
I've looked all over www.openbsd.org.
Any sort of guide
There is no:
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/4.7/packages/amd64/jre*
I don't suppose I should use:
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/4.6/packages/amd64/jre*
?
I'll maybe try building from source..
- Jay
Ah, thanks. But there is i386. And I only need jre, not jdk or plugin.
I'll try from source within a few days (or maybe wait to see about 4.8).
- Jay
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 16:44:41 +0200
Subject: Re: java/amd64/4.7?
From: tomas.bod...@gmail.com
Arg.
Presumably I need to eithe redownload that file?
Though I bet that won't fix it.
Probably need to unpack, delete some file, hope it isn't used, repack..
- Jay
I'm building as root, but it'd probably be a nice option to automate:
make
ssh r...@localhost cd `pwd` make install
Maybe it already is.
- Jay
/python26 python or such)
- Jay
sudo won't work for me -- root password is *.
I'll have to try it with ssh r...@localhost, which will work.
Thanks,
- Jay
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:30:32 -0500
Subject: Re: ports/root/make install
From: sisso...@gmail.com
To: jay.kr...@cornell.edu
CC: misc
My ideal setup would be:
1) no passwords (* in /etc/passwd or via vipw)
2) only ssh for remote access
i.e. no password-based security, only something better
3) except console, where anyone should be able to login
without any password (granted, I only have two users, root and jay
ok, 1.5 built, 1.6 built, 1.7 in progress. Thanks.
I did say A for all during 15's extract.
Maybe there is a way to automate that.
I can remove 1.5 and 1.6 once 1.7 is there.
Still not understanding why i386 prebuilds this but amd64 does not.
- Jay
Date
a while and do build unnecessarily from source.
Thanks,
- Jay
I thought it'd need me to enter it.
And there isn't one.
Thanks,
- Jay
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:09:25 -0400
Subject: Re: ports/root/make install
From: ted.unan...@gmail.com
To: jay.kr...@cornell.edu
CC: sisso...@gmail.com; misc@openbsd.org
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Jay K jay.kr
up, so it can be analyzed for conflicts,
so both would be skipped.
- Jay
-root and then login root?
ssh surely isn't the sole gatekeeper for login?
(Granted, I am NOT running ftpd or telnetd; though
at some point I'd like smbd/nfsd, hopefully
both secure and convenient, hopefully using ssh somehow...).
Thanks,
- Jay
login.
Right? So I'm back to the earlier point.
Thanks,
- Jay
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:11:44 +0300
Subject: Re: password-less console-only access and ssh remote access?
From: tomas.bod...@gmail.com
To: jay.kr...@cornell.edu
CC: bret.lamb...@gmail.com
login.
Right? So I'm back to the earlier point.
Thanks,
- Jay
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:11:44 +0300
Subject: Re: password-less console-only access and ssh remote access?
From: tomas.bod...@gmail.com
To: jay.kr...@cornell.edu
CC: bret.lamb...@gmail.com
.
I've gotten by with just the second and being sure I don't need console
access after initial setup (I've run systems like this quite a while now,
including upgrading OpenBSD a few times on a few machines, and Debian
4.0=5.0)
Thanks,
- Jay
'
/
etc.
but 1.6 should suffice, thanks.
- Jay
single user mode. I certainly reboot
the machines remotely sometimes (e.g. for an upgrade). Though I haven't
needed single user mode yet, in a long time.
Thanks,
- Jay
I'll bet if it was up your Arse with a ham sandwich you'd know how we get our
sales leads...
J
Hello,
I was searching Remax Real Estate online and came across your information.
Can you tell me how you get your sales leads?
Please let me know.
Sincerely
Dave Hughes
Nuk'em from orbit, its the only way to be sure...
J
Stuart VanZee stua...@datalinesys.com writes:
Don't be silly. While Lions do provide excelent physical security
they don't provide any data security at all.
Just imagine for a moment protecting your OpenBSD boxen with a pair of
lions
message repeated 23 times
Mar 24 18:43:18 o51 /bsd: re0: watchdog timeout
Mar 24 18:46:20 o51 last message repeated 6 times
Mar 24 19:03:40 o51 last message repeated 28 times
Thanks,
Jay
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012, Jay Hart wrote:
1. Unless I disable acpi (see dmesg), box freezes at 'acpiec0 at acpi0'
What about just disabling acpiec?
Snappy question section 5.9... got it.
Jay
1 - 100 of 294 matches
Mail list logo
