Re: Article OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure and BSD, the truth blog
On 28/05/2020 07:16, Quantum Robin wrote: Hi, While surfing on the Google to learn more about OpenBSD, I encountered this one: "OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure ( https://aboutthebsds.wordpress.com/2013/01/25/20/) Is the author telling the truth? Or just yet another anti-BSD thing? why the fuck do you spam our mailboxes with some random shit you found on the internet, which is 7+ years ago? Do your research. G ps. shit, over the years this list is infecting my attitude.
Re: Article OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure and BSD, the truth blog
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 01:15:36PM -0700, Amarendra Godbole wrote: > Aha! So my hunch was right -- I thought that'd be the case seeing the > comments under your name that were totally out of character from your > posts here. > > -ag > > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 12:08 PM Kevin Chadwick wrote: > > > > On 2020-05-28 18:38, Amarendra Godbole wrote: > > > It indeed is written by someone lacking knowledge about everything. It > > > is funny, and gave me a good laugh - the comments are even funnier! > > > > Be aware that the author deletes your comments and replaces them with his > > own, > > under your name, whilst hiding behind wordpress.com! > > > > Actually that scum is hosted at wordpress.com, I'm not sure that they would like knowing someone is changing comments without changing the authors' names. Also, that shit is anonymous, meaning the bastard can't even take responsability for his drivel
Re: Article OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure and BSD, the truth blog
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 9:22 PM Quantum Robin wrote: > While surfing on the Google to learn more about OpenBSD, I encountered this > one: "OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure ( > https://aboutthebsds.wordpress.com/2013/01/25/20/) > If OpenBSD was to have a sex scandal, I would have hoped for something more colorful. Ho hum. Is the author telling the truth? Or just yet another anti-BSD thing? > The author isn't even lying well, much less telling the truth. -- andrew fabbro and...@fabbro.org
Re: Article OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure and BSD, the truth blog
Aha! So my hunch was right -- I thought that'd be the case seeing the comments under your name that were totally out of character from your posts here. -ag On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 12:08 PM Kevin Chadwick wrote: > > On 2020-05-28 18:38, Amarendra Godbole wrote: > > It indeed is written by someone lacking knowledge about everything. It > > is funny, and gave me a good laugh - the comments are even funnier! > > Be aware that the author deletes your comments and replaces them with his own, > under your name, whilst hiding behind wordpress.com! >
Re: Article OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure and BSD, the truth blog
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 07:58:45PM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > On 2020-05-28 18:38, Amarendra Godbole wrote: > > It indeed is written by someone lacking knowledge about everything. It > > is funny, and gave me a good laugh - the comments are even funnier! > > Be aware that the author deletes your comments and replaces them with his own, > under your name, whilst hiding behind wordpress.com! > > Ah I saw your name and was wondering. So that guy is a pure asshole
Re: Article OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure and BSD, the truth blog
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 01:27:15PM +0200, infoomatic wrote: I just don't get it why some people put so much energy into bashing a free product instead of just ignoring it if they really hate it. The time would have been better spent on supporting/improving OpenBSD or another project. OpenBSD has mystique, a bunch of brilliant-but-prickly guys building a super-secure OS for their own use, everyone's heard of it but few actually use it, "ooh OpenBSD, that's hardcore." In a systemd-and-Microsoft world it starts to look something like the Man in the High Castle of operating systems, which is a tempting target for those who like the comfort of the majority. Release poster idea: "The Pufferfish in the High Castle"
Re: Article OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure and BSD, the truth blog
On 2020-05-28 18:38, Amarendra Godbole wrote: > It indeed is written by someone lacking knowledge about everything. It > is funny, and gave me a good laugh - the comments are even funnier! Be aware that the author deletes your comments and replaces them with his own, under your name, whilst hiding behind wordpress.com!
Re: Article OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure and BSD, the truth blog
It indeed is written by someone lacking knowledge about everything. It is funny, and gave me a good laugh - the comments are even funnier! -ag On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 11:30 AM Anders Andersson wrote: > > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 7:41 PM wrote: > > > > On May 28, 2020 11:42 AM, Marc Espie wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 01:16:59AM -0300, Quantum Robin wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > While surfing on the Google to learn more about OpenBSD, I > > encountered this > > > one: "OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure ( > > > https://aboutthebsds.wordpress.com/2013/01/25/20/) > > > > > > Is the author telling the truth? Or just yet another anti-BSD > > thing? > > > > > > > "At meetings, people are often physically attacked for having even a > > minor disagreement with de Raadt" > > > > Hyperbole much ? > > > > Theo has been known to be fairly opiniated, but "physically > > attacked"? > > > > How can you take this guy seriously ? > > > > > > I found it pretty comical. > > Agreed, thanks for the link, OP! > > "Finally like all BSDs, third party applications are not audited for > vulnerabilities and research has show that nearly 3 out of 5 of the > applications are actually trojans." :D >
Re: Article OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure and BSD, the truth blog
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 7:41 PM wrote: > > On May 28, 2020 11:42 AM, Marc Espie wrote: > > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 01:16:59AM -0300, Quantum Robin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > While surfing on the Google to learn more about OpenBSD, I > encountered this > > one: "OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure ( > > https://aboutthebsds.wordpress.com/2013/01/25/20/) > > > > Is the author telling the truth? Or just yet another anti-BSD > thing? > > > > "At meetings, people are often physically attacked for having even a > minor disagreement with de Raadt" > > Hyperbole much ? > > Theo has been known to be fairly opiniated, but "physically > attacked"? > > How can you take this guy seriously ? > > > I found it pretty comical. Agreed, thanks for the link, OP! "Finally like all BSDs, third party applications are not audited for vulnerabilities and research has show that nearly 3 out of 5 of the applications are actually trojans." :D
Re: Article OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure and BSD, the truth blog
On 5/28/2020 7:27 AM, infoomatic wrote: > I just don't get it why some people put so much energy into bashing a > free product instead of just ignoring it if they really hate it. > [snip] It is an easy way to get attention.
Re: Article OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure and BSD, the truth blog
On 2020-05-28 07:16, Quantum Robin wrote: Hi, While surfing on the Google to learn more about OpenBSD, I encountered this one: "OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure ( https://aboutthebsds.wordpress.com/2013/01/25/20/) Is the author telling the truth? Or just yet another anti-BSD thing? Those haters are always somehow associating to me with the MTV song by Ian Gillan :-))
Re: Article OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure and BSD, the truth blog
On Thu, 28 May 2020 at 12:27, infoomatic wrote: > > I just don't get it why some people put so much energy into bashing a > free product instead of just ignoring it if they really hate it. The > time would have been better spent on supporting/improving OpenBSD or > another project. You can say the same for 99.9% of all open source/free software: because they are free, in the public eye and easy to access, they attract more attention than products you have to pay a fortune for. Who criticises a k$ software with no source attached? This is the downside of "given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow". -- Ottavio Caruso
Re: Article OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure and BSD, the truth blog
On May 28, 2020 11:42 AM, Marc Espie wrote: On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 01:16:59AM -0300, Quantum Robin wrote: > Hi, > > While surfing on the Google to learn more about OpenBSD, I encountered this > one: "OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure ( > https://aboutthebsds.wordpress.com/2013/01/25/20/) > > Is the author telling the truth? Or just yet another anti-BSD thing? > "At meetings, people are often physically attacked for having even a minor disagreement with de Raadt" Hyperbole much ? Theo has been known to be fairly opiniated, but "physically attacked"? How can you take this guy seriously ? I found it pretty comical.
Re: Article OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure and BSD, the truth blog
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 01:16:59AM -0300, Quantum Robin wrote: > Hi, > > While surfing on the Google to learn more about OpenBSD, I encountered this > one: "OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure ( > https://aboutthebsds.wordpress.com/2013/01/25/20/) > > Is the author telling the truth? Or just yet another anti-BSD thing? > "At meetings, people are often physically attacked for having even a minor disagreement with de Raadt" Hyperbole much ? Theo has been known to be fairly opiniated, but "physically attacked"? How can you take this guy seriously ?
Re: Article OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure and BSD, the truth blog
I just don't get it why some people put so much energy into bashing a free product instead of just ignoring it if they really hate it. The time would have been better spent on supporting/improving OpenBSD or another project. On 28.05.20 13:20, Ian Darwin wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 02:21:49PM +1000, Aaron Mason wrote: >> On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 2:20 PM Quantum Robin >> wrote: >>> While surfing on the Google to learn more about OpenBSD, I encountered this >>> one: "OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure ( >>> https://aboutthebsds.wordpress.com/2013/01/25/20/) >>> >>> Is the author telling the truth? Or just yet another anti-BSD thing? >> If it has to tell you it's "the truth" in its title, it probably isn't. > If it can't spell "Functional", it probably isn't. >
Re: Article OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure and BSD, the truth blog
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 02:21:49PM +1000, Aaron Mason wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 2:20 PM Quantum Robin > wrote: > > While surfing on the Google to learn more about OpenBSD, I encountered this > > one: "OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure ( > > https://aboutthebsds.wordpress.com/2013/01/25/20/) > > > > Is the author telling the truth? Or just yet another anti-BSD thing? > > If it has to tell you it's "the truth" in its title, it probably isn't. If it can't spell "Functional", it probably isn't.
Re: Article OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure and BSD, the truth blog
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 2:21 PM Aaron Mason wrote: > > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 2:20 PM Quantum Robin > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > While surfing on the Google to learn more about OpenBSD, I encountered this > > one: "OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure ( > > https://aboutthebsds.wordpress.com/2013/01/25/20/) > > > > Is the author telling the truth? Or just yet another anti-BSD thing? > > If it has to tell you it's "the truth" in its title, it probably isn't. > > -- > Aaron Mason - Programmer, open source addict > I've taken my software vows - for beta or for worse It's also difficult to take someone seriously when they can't spell the words they're using, like "functional" and "definitely" -- Aaron Mason - Programmer, open source addict I've taken my software vows - for beta or for worse
Re: Article OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure and BSD, the truth blog
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 2:20 PM Quantum Robin wrote: > > Hi, > > While surfing on the Google to learn more about OpenBSD, I encountered this > one: "OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure ( > https://aboutthebsds.wordpress.com/2013/01/25/20/) > > Is the author telling the truth? Or just yet another anti-BSD thing? If it has to tell you it's "the truth" in its title, it probably isn't. -- Aaron Mason - Programmer, open source addict I've taken my software vows - for beta or for worse
Article OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure and BSD, the truth blog
Hi, While surfing on the Google to learn more about OpenBSD, I encountered this one: "OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure ( https://aboutthebsds.wordpress.com/2013/01/25/20/) Is the author telling the truth? Or just yet another anti-BSD thing?
